Skip to main content

Electrochemistry

  • Chapter
A History of Chemistry

Abstract

Faraday1 said: ‘the anions must move in accordance with each other in one direction, and the cations in the other. Nay, more than that, equivalent portions of these bodies must advance in opposite directions’, i.e. the ions move in opposite directions with equal speeds. L. Gmelin2 noticed that in the electrolysis of copper sulphate solution the liquid near the cathode was decolorised. C. S. M. Pouillet3 found that in electrolysing a solution of gold chloride only the liquid near the cathode lost in gold content; he assumed that the action was exerted only by the cathode, the anode being indifferent: ‘le pôle positif reste sans action décomposante’, the chlorine liberated passing ‘par une série de décompositions et de récompositions successives’ to this pole. With other chlorides there was some action but Pouillet explained his results by l’inégale puissances des poles’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1964 J. R. Partington

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Partington, J.R. (1964). Electrochemistry. In: A History of Chemistry. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00554-3_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics