Abstract
When we turn to the question of what it is for us to be the persons we are, there seem to be two things to say about it at once. It is plain that, in life as we know it now at least, we have bodies, and it seems also clear that we are in some way more than our bodies, that we have minds as well. This is how we would put it for rough and ready purposes. But what does it mean to say that we have a mind, or for that matter, that we have a body? When we speak of having something we usually think of some entity which, as we say, belongs to us. But there is also a looser use of the verb ‘to have’ in these contexts, as when we say that we ‘have’ a pain. If we say that we ‘have a mind’ are we referring to some kind of entity, and in what sense would we say that this entity belongs to us? And is the body an entity, and in what way does it belong to us? Are we composite beings, having both mind and body in some relation to one another? If so, is one part or the other dispensable, and what, in any case, is the relation between them?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1973 Hywel D. Lewis
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lewis, H.D. (1973). Mind and Body. In: The Self and Immortality. Philosophy of Religion Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00152-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00152-1_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-00154-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-00152-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)