What Role for “Long-term Insurance” in Adaptation? An Analysis of the Prospects for and Pricing of Multi-year Insurance Contracts
Multi-year insurance has been proposed as a tool to incentivise policy-holders to invest in property-level adaptation. In a world of rising natural catastrophe risks, such autonomous adaptations could have significant benefits for the property owner, the insurer and society. We review some arguments made in respect of multi-year contracts and provide new analyses on their price implications. We conclude that even under conditions of known and stationary risk, initial capital requirements could be around 50 per cent higher for a 10-year contract than an annual contract and the annual premium around 5.5 per cent higher; in the real world of changing and uncertain risks, premiums would be even higher. We also conclude that multi-year contracts have several additional disadvantages that are likely to limit their demand and availability in the general retail insurance market. For adaptation, we conclude that other tools, such as risk-based premiums and loans for adaptation tied to the property, have greater potential.
KeywordsCapital Requirement Insurance Industry Insurance Contract Flood Insurance Policy Term
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Association of British Insurers (2009) Resilient Reinstatement: The Costs of Flood Resilient Reinstatement of Domestic Properties, ABI Research Paper. No 14, London.Google Scholar
- Eisen, R. (1990) ‘Problems of equilibria in insurance markets with asymmetric information’, in H. Louberge (ed.) Risk Information and Insurance, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 123–141.Google Scholar
- European Commission (2007) Sector Inquiry under Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 on Business insurance, (Final Report) (September).Google Scholar
- Goss, R. and O’Neill, D. (2010) Long-term retail general insurance: The potential for long-term home insurance contracts in the context of flood risk, ABI Research Paper No. 21, London.Google Scholar
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, in S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.) Cambridge, U.K. and New York USA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Klein, R. (2008) Catastrophe risk and the regulation of property insurance, Working Paper, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar
- Kreps, R.E. (1990) ‘Reinsurer risk loads from marginal surplus requirements’, Proceedings of Casualty Actuarial Society LXXVII: 196–203.Google Scholar
- Kunreuther, H., Ginsberg, R., Miller, L., Sagi, P., Slovic, P., Borkan, B. and Katz, N. (1978) Disaster Insurance Protection: Public Policy Lessons, New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Kunreuther, H.C. and Michel-Kerjan, E.O. (2009) Managing catastrophes through insurance: Challenges and opportunities for reducing future risks, Working Paper 2009–11–30, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
- Risk Management Solutions (RMS) (2010) Study of Florida’s Windstorm Mitigation Credits Assessing the Impact on the Florida Insurance Market, A Report prepared for Florida Legislature (March).Google Scholar