Abstract
The career of the eminent Buddhist monk Amoghavajra (Chinese: Bukongjingang or Bukong, 705–774) is closely connected with the crisis of imperial authority in the years after the An Lushan Rebellion (755–763) that led to a near collapse of the Tang dynasty (618–907). This offers valuable reference points for a rethinking of the relation between politics and Buddhist authority and the respective institutional framework supported by the imperial court.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Orlando, R. (1981) A Study of Chinese Documents Concerning the Life of the Tantric Buddhist Patriarch Amoghavajra (PhD thesis: Princeton University);
Orzech, C. (1998) Politics and Transcendent Wisdom (University Park: Penn State Press);
Nakata, M. (2006) ‘Tōchō seijishijō no “Ninnōkyō” honyaku to hōe,’ Shigaku Zasshi 115, 3, 322–47;
Lü, J. (2010) ‘Lun Bukong de zhengjiao sixiang,’ Shijie Zongjiao Yanjiu 4, 39–46;
Lehnert, M. (2011) ‘Amoghavajra: His Role in and Influence on the Development of Buddhism,’ in C. Orzech, R. Payne and H. Sørensen (eds.) Esoteric Buddhism and the Tantras in East Asia (Leiden: Brill), 351–59;
Yu, X. (2012) ‘Zuo tu you shu: Bukong suo jin hupo baosheng rulai xiang jikao,’ in X. Yu (ed.) Bo wang ming sha: zhonggu xieben yanjiu yu xiandai zhongguo xueshushi zhi huitong (Shanghai: Shanghai guji chubanshe) 322–37;
Goble, G. C. (2012) Chinese Esoteric Buddhism: Amoghavajra and the Ruling Elite (PhD thesis: Indiana University).
See Sharf, R. H. (2002) Coming to Terms with Chinese Buddhism (Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press), p. 269.
Luhmann, N. (1987) Soziale Systeme (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp), pp. 626–27.
see Luhmann, N. (2003) Macht (Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius) pp. 60–69.
Weber, M. (1968) The Religion of China, translated by H. H. Gerth (Toronto: MacMillan), pp. 30–32.
cf. Chen, N. (1994) ‘The Problem of Theodicy in Ancient China,’ Journal of Chinese Religions, 22, 51–74.
See Greiner, P. (1985) ‘Der Herrscher und das Gesetz — Gemeinsamkeiten im konfuzianischen und legistischen Staatsdenken,’ in G. Naundorf, K-H. Pohl and H-H. Schmidt (eds.) Religion und Philosophie in Ostasien. Testschrift für Heinz Steininger zum 65. Geburtstag (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann), p. 423.
Puett, M. (2010) ‘Ritualization as Domestication,’ in L. Dolce, G. Raz, and K. Triplett (eds.) Grammars and Morphologies of Ritual Practices in Asia, Section II (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz), pp. 366–67;
see Michaels, A. (2010) ‘The Grammar of Rituals,’ in A. Michaels and A. Mishra (eds.) Grammars and Morphologies of Ritual Practices in Asia, Section 1 (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz), pp. 10–14, 18–21.
See Dalby, M. T. (1979) ‘Court Politics in late T’ang Times,’ in D. Twitchett and J. K. Fairbank (eds.) The Cambridge History of China, vol. 3, part 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 561–71.
Chen, J. (2010) Crossfire. Shingon-Tendai Strife as Seen in Two Twelfth-century Polemics, with Special References to Their Background in Tang China. (Tokyo: The International Institute for Buddhist Studies), pp. 181–83;
Weinstein, S. (1987) Buddhism under the T’ang (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 79–82.
see Xiong, V. (1996) ‘Ritual Innovations and Taoism under Tang Xuanzong,’ T’oung Pao LXXXII, pp. 295–96.
Chen, J. (2007) Philosopher, Practitioner, Politician (Leiden: Brill), p. 341, n17.
Chen, J. (2005) ‘Fazang (643–712),’ Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 28, 77.
Vanden Broucke, P. (2007) ‘The Accounts of Milbon, Hyet’ong and Myǒngnang in the Samguk Yusa,’ in A. Heirman and S. P. Bumbacher (eds.) The Spread of Buddhism (Leiden: Brill), pp. 298–99.
Davidson, R. M. (2002) Indian Esoteric Buddhism (New York: Columbia University Press), pp. 113–31.
See Dunnell, R. (1996) The Great State of White and High. Buddhism and State Tormation in Eleventh-Century Xia (Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press);
Abe, R. (1999) The Weaving of Mantra (New York: Columbia University Press).
See Forte, A. (2003) ‘On the Origin of the Purple Kāṣāya in China,’ in G. Verardi and S. Vita (eds.) Buddhist Asia 1, Papers from the Tirst Conference of Buddhist Studies Held in Naples in May 2001 (Kyoto: Italian School of East Asian Studies).
Mochizuki, S. (1974) Mochizuki Bukkyō Daijiten (Tōkyō: Sekai Seiten Kankō Kyōkai), p. 4385b.
Peterson, C. A. (1979) ‘Court and Province in Mid- and Late T’ang,’ in D. Twitchett and J. K. Fairbank (eds.), The Cambridge History of China, vol. 3, part 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 482–91;
Gernet, J. (1995) Buddhism in Chinese Society, translated by F. Verellen (New York: Columbia University Press), pp. 231–47.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Martin Lehnert
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lehnert, M. (2016). Feeding a Scapegoat? The Political Function of Amoghavajra’s Ritual Services in Protecting the Country. In: Kawanami, H. (eds) Buddhism and the Political Process. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-57400-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-57400-8_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-84747-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-57400-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)