Abstract
How are small states managing the shift under way in the global economic and political order from the USA and Europe towards other regions, especially Asia? In the International Relations literature, there is a tendency to focus on the great powers — they set the scene, and the small states have to adjust, and therefore their different national political characteristics, values and preferences are not seen as having a strong influence. Being small is seen as an inherent disadvantage in international politics, but are there also advantages? Analyzing how Danish foreign policy, especially the Danish approach to the BRICs, has developed in recent years, I show how Denmark — a small state — is trying to maneuver in the changing world order through a “creative agency” approach.2
In the beginning of the 21st century, Denmark faces new opportunities and challenges on the international scene. Through pursuing a new active foreign policy that has a European, a transatlantic and a global dimension, all closely integrated, we will be able to promote Danish interests and values in a changing world1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Altinget, 2013. Ombudsmanden indgår aftale med kineserne, June 26. Available at http://www.altinget.dk/artikel/ombudsmanden-indgaar-aftale-med-kineserne (Accessed March 29, 2015).
Daily Mail, 2015. “Denmark Applies to Join China-Backed AIIB Investment Bank.” March 29. Available at http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/reuters/article-3016613/Denmark-applies-join-China-backed-AIIB-investment-bank.html (Accessed March 29, 2015).
Elbjørn, K. and Wivel A., 2006. “Forståelsesbrevet.” In D. Gress and K. Elb-jørn (eds.) 20 begivenheder der skabte Danmark. Copenhagen: Gyldendal, pp. 367–385.
Elman, M. F., 1995. “The Foreign Policies of Small States: Challenging Neorealism In Its Own Backyard.” British Journal of Political Science, 25(2), pp. 171–217.
Espersen, L., 2010. Kurs mod 2020: Dansk udenrigspolitik i nyt farvand’. University of Copenhagen, November 23. Available at http://um.dk/da/om-os/ministrene/tidligere-ministres-taler-og-artikler/lene%20espersens%20taler/udenrigsministerens-tale-ved-fremlaeggelsen-af-oplaegget-kurs-mod-2020/ (Accessed May 20, 2015).
EVM/Ministry of Business and Growth of Denmark, 2012. Ansvarlig vœkst. Handlingsplan for virksomheders samfundsansvar 2012–2015. Copenhagen: The Danish Ministry of Business and Growth.
Financial Times, 2015a. US Attacks UK’s ‘Constant Accommodation’ with China, March 12. Available at http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/31c4880a-c8d2-11e4-bc64-00144feab7de.html#axzz3VbSGJPMn (Accessed March 27, 2015).
Financial Times, 2015b. “Australia to Join China-Led Bank Despite US Opposition.” March 28. Available at http://www.ft.com/crms/s/0/656a23fa-d59c-11e4-bbb7-00144feab7de.html#axzz3Vtd5U5c4 (Accessed March 30, 2015).
The Guardian, 2015. “Australia Confirms It Will Join China’s Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank.” March 28. Available at http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/mar/29/australia-confirms-It-Will-Join-chinas-asian-infrastructure-investment-bank (Accessed March 29, 2015).
Hey, J. A. K., 2003. “Introducing Small State Foreign Policy.” In J. A. K. (ed.) Small States in World Politics: Explaining Foreign Policy Behaviour. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 1–11.
Holm, H. H., 1997. “Denmark’s Active Internationalism: Advocating International Norms with Domestic Constraints.” In B. Heurlin and H. Mourtizen (eds.) Danish Foreign Policy Yearbook 1997. Copenhagen: Dansk Udenrigspolitisk Institut, pp. 52–80.
Holm, H. H., 2002. “Danish Foreign Policy Activism: The Rise and Decline.” In B. Heurlin and H. Mouritzen (eds.) Danish Foreign Policy Yearbook 2002. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies, pp. 19–45.
Holm, H. H., 2004. “Fra aktiv internationalisme til aktiv værdipolitik: Danmarks ny udenrigspolitik.” In M. Kelstrup, O. K. Pedersen and I. D. Petersen (eds.) Politiske processer og strukturer i det 21. Aarhundrede. Copenhagen: Forlaget Politiske Studier, pp. 522–554.
Jyllandsposten, 2015. Ruslands Ambassadør: danske skibe kan blive mål for russiske atomangreb, March 21. Available at: http://jyllands-posten.dk/indland/ECE7573125/Ruslands-ambassad%C3%B8r-Danske-skibe-kan-blive-m%C3%A51-for-russisk-atomangreb/ (Accessed March 23, 2015).
Knudsen, T., 2006. Fra enevœlde til folkestyre. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.
Knudsen, U. V., 2014. “The International Situation and Danish Foreign Policy 2013.” In N. Hvidt and H. Mouritzen (eds.) Danish Foreign Policy Yearbook 2013. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies, pp. 15–39.
Larsen, H., 2005. Analysing the Foreign Policy of Small States in the EU: The Case of Denmark. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Larsen, H., 2009. “Danish Foreign Policy and the Balance between the EU and the US: The Choice between Brussels and Washington after 2001.” Cooperation and Conflict, 44(2), pp. 209–230.
Marcussen, M. and Ronit K., 2014. Dansk diplomati: Klassiske trœk og nye tendenser. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzel.
MFA/Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark, 2008. Denmark-China — A Mutually Beneficial Partnership. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
MFA/Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark, 2010. Kurs mod 2020: Dansk Udenrigspolitik i nyt farvand. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Available at http://www.ft.dk/samling/20101/almdel/uru/bilag/41/921662.pdf (Accessed May 20, 2015).
MFA/Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark, 2012. Denmark’s Growth Market Strategy. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Available at http://um.dk/da/~/media/UM/Danish-site/Documents/Eksportraadet/Markeder/BRIK/Denmarks%20Growth%20-%20Danish%20solutions%20to%20challenges%20in%20growth%20markets.pdf (Accessed May 20, 2015).
MFA/Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark, 2014. Mere Danmark i verden. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Available at http://um.dk/da/~/media/UM/Danish-site/Documents/Nyheder/Mere%20Danmark%20i%20verden%20-%20Udenrigspolitisk%20visionspapir.pdf. (Accessed May 20, 2015)
Mouritzen, H., 1998. Theory and Reality of International Politics. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Mouritzen, H., 2007. “Denmark’s super Atlanticism.” Journal of Transatlantic Studies, 5(2), pp. 155–169.
Mouritzen, H. and Wivel A., 2012. Explaining Foreign Policy. International Diplomacy and the Russo-Georgian War. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Odgaard, L., 2000. “Danmarks anerkendelse af Folkerepublikken Kina.” In M. Schoenhals (ed.) Diplomatiska Erkännaden. Sverige, Danmark ach Folkerepubliken år 1950. Lund: Lund University, pp. 37–72.
Pedersen, R. B., 2012. “Danish Foreign Policy Activism: Differences in Kind or Degree?” Cooperation and Conflict, 47(3), pp. 331–349.
Petersen, N., 2005. “Danmark som international aktør 705–2002.” Politica, 37(1), pp. 44–59.
Politiken, 2015. Regeringen: Vi skal ikke fornœrme Beijing, February 10. Available at http://politiken.dk/indland/politik/ECE2541233/regeringen-vi-skal-ikke-fornaerme-beijing/ (Accessed March 23, 2015).
Rasmussen, A. F., 2003. Address by Prime Minister of Denmark Anders Fogh Rasmussen. Woodrow Wilson Center, Washington, DC, May 9. Available at http://www.stm.dk/_p_7430.html (Accessed March 18, 2015).
Rasmussen, A. F., 2006. The Prime Minister’s Speech for British, Lithuanian and Danish Soldiers in Camp Dannevang, May 23. Available at http://www.stm.dk/_p_11187.html (Accessed March 18, 2015).
Rose, G., 1998. “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy.” World Politics, 51(1), pp. 144–172.
Skak, M., 2013. “The BRICS and Denmark — Economics & High Politics.” In N. Hvidt and H. Mouritzen (eds.) Danish Foreign Policy Yearbook 2013. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies, pp. 78–112.
Sørensen, C. T. N., 2014. “Changing Geo-Political Realities in the Arctic Region: Possibilities and Challenges for Relations between Denmark and China.” Newsletter for Center for Polar and Oceanic Studies, 3(2), pp. 2–7.
Taliaferro, J. W., Lobell, S. E. and Ripsman, N. M., 2009. “Introduction: Neoclassical Realism, the State and Foreign Policy.” In S. E. Lobell, N. M. Ripsman and J. W. Taliaferro (eds.) Neoclassical Realism, The State, and Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–41.
Waltz, K. N., 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Wivel, A., 2013. “From Peacemaker to Warmonger? Explaining Denmark’s Great Power Politics.” Swiss Political Science Review, 19(3), pp. 298–321.
Wohlforth, W. C., 2008. “Realism and Foreign Policy.” In S. Smith, A. Hadfield and T. Dunne (eds.) Foreign Policy. Theories. Actors. Cases. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 31–48.
Østergaard, C. S., 2011. “Danish-Chinese Relations: Continuity and Change 1949–2011.” In N. Hvidt and H. Mouritzen (eds.) Danish Foreign Policy Yearbook 2011. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies, pp. 28–77.
Østergaard, U., 2000. “Danish National Identity: Between Multinational Heritage and Small State Nationalism.” In H. Branner and M. Kelstrup (eds.) Denmark’s Policy towards Europe after 1945: History, Theory and Options. Odense: Odense University Press, pp. 139–184.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Camilla T. N. Sørensen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sørensen, C.T.N. (2016). A Small State Maneuvering in the Changing World Order: Denmark’s “Creative Agency” Approach to Engagement with the BRICs. In: Christensen, S.F., Xing, L. (eds) Emerging Powers, Emerging Markets, Emerging Societies. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-56178-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-56178-7_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-85093-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56178-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)