Conclusion: Muslimism in Turkey and Beyond

  • Neslihan Cevik

Abstract

In this book, I have concentrated on the changing interactions between Muslims and modernity in Turkey. Instead of defining these interactions either generically or normatively as “moderate” Islamism, I have argued that, in content and in practice, they embody the rise of a new Islamic orthodoxy. I use “orthodoxy” simply to denote a commitment to a religious tradition by infusing the super-empirical into everyday life. This orthodoxy is “new,” however, because it rejects both the attitude that modernity and religion are absolutely incommensurable and the attitude that there is little conflict between global modernity and religion. In other words, it is neither a liberal translation of religion into modernist terms nor a fundamentalist rejection of modernity. Instead, it is a hybrid framework that engages aspects of modern life, while submitting that life to a sacred, moral order.

Keywords

Europe Assimilation Turkey Expense Arena 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    For a critique of Muslimism along these lines, see Halil Ibrahim Yenigun, “Turkish Islamism in the Post-Gezi Park Era,” The American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences 31, no. 1 (2014): 140–154.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Mensur Akgün, Sabiha Senyücel Gündogar, Jonathan Levack, and Gokce Percinoglu, The Perception of Turkey in the Middle East 2013. TESEV Foreign Policy Programme (Istanbul: TESEV, 2010).Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Mensur Akgün and Sabiha Senyücel Gündogar, The Perception of Turkey in the Middle East 2013: Key Findings. TESEV Foreign Policy Programme (Istanbul: TESEV, 2013).Google Scholar
  4. 9.
    Neslihan Cevik and George Thomas, “Muslimism in Turkey and New Religious Orthodoxies,” Middle East Studies 3, no. 2 (2012): 143–181.Google Scholar
  5. 10.
    Mohammed Ayoob, The Many Faces of Political Islam: Religion and Politics in the Muslim World (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2008).Google Scholar
  6. 11.
    Rachel Rinaldo, Mobilizing Piety: Islam and Feminism in Indonesia (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 12.
    Dietrich Jung and Marie Juul Petersen, “We Think That This Job Pleases Allah: Islamic Charity, Social Order, and the Construction of Modern Muslim Selfhoods in Jordan,” International Journal of Middle East Studies 46 (2014): 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 17.
    Christian Smith and Michael O. Emerson, American Evangelicalism: Embattled and Thriving (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).Google Scholar
  9. 19.
    Carl Henry, “Making Political Choices: An Evangelical Perspective,” in Piety and Politics: Evangelicals and Fundamentalists Confront the World, ed. Richard John Neuhaus and Michael Cromartie (Washington, DC: Ethics and Public Policy Center, 1987), 101.Google Scholar
  10. 20.
    James Davison Hunter, Evangelicalism: The Coming Generation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Neslihan Cevik 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neslihan Cevik

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations