Conclusion 1856 and a “Peace that Sticks in the Throat”

  • Andrew C. Rath
Chapter

Abstract

On January 1, 1856, a “pale and upset” Czar Alexander II summoned his most influential advisors to the Winter Palace in St. Petersburg for an early-morning meeting.1 At issue was a single question: should the Russian Empire accept an Austrian-mediated peace proposal or continue fighting an expanding Allied coalition. The arguments offered in response to Austria’s proposal were complex. Regardless of whether they emphasized military, economic, diplomatic, or territorial concerns, however, all those present unambiguously concluded that Russia’s position was fast becoming untenable.2 In emphasizing that their government should seek lenient peace terms while it still could, senior ministers and diplomats did not even mention the September 1855 fall of Sevastopol.3 Instead, their focus on Russia’s economic exhaustion and mounting diplomatic isolation, coupled with potential defection of Poland and Finland, proves that even contemporary Russian decision makers saw the struggle as more than a “Crimean” War.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Vladimir Alexeevich Mukhanov, [Russian language], “From the Diary Notes of VA. Mukhanov, 1856.” Russian Arkhiv, No. 10 (1896), 164.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    See, for example, Werner Eugen Mosse, “How Russia Made Peace September 1855 to April 1856.” Cambridge Historical Journal, Vol. 11, No. 3 (1955), 307–312.Google Scholar
  3. 11.
    Sergey Spiridonovich Tatischev [Russian language], Emperor Alexander II, His Life and Reign (St. Petersburg, Russia: Aleksey S. Suvorin, 1911), 147.Google Scholar
  4. 16.
    Tatischev, Emperor Alexander II, His Life and Reign, 148 and Peter von Meyendorff and Otto Hoetzsch, eds., Peter von Meyendorff, ein Russischer Diplomat an den H ö fen von Berlin und Wien, vol. 3 (Berlin and Leipzig, German: Walter de Gruyter, 1923), 214.Google Scholar
  5. 18.
    Petr P. Cherkasov [Russian language], “Behind the Scenes of the Paris Peace Congress of 1866.” Modern and Contemporary History, No. 1 (2012), 208.Google Scholar
  6. 41.
    Martin Senner, ed., Akten zur Geschichte des Krimkriegs (AGKK): Franzö sische Akten zur Geschichte des Krimkriegs, Band 3 [3. März 1855 bis 19. Mai 1856] (Munich, Germany: R. Oldenbourg Verlag, 2001).Google Scholar
  7. 46.
    Bartholomew James Sulivan and Henry Norton Sulivan, eds., Life and Letters of the late Admiral Bartholomew James Sulivan, K.C.B., 1810–1890 (London, UK: John Murray, 1896), 367.Google Scholar
  8. 53.
    Orlando Figes, The Crimean War: A History (New York: Metropolitan Books, 2010), 417.Google Scholar
  9. 54.
    Jan Martin Lemnitzer, Power, Law, and the End of Privateering (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014), 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 59.
    Herbert William Malkin, “The Inner History of the Declaration of Paris.” British Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 8 (1927), 26.Google Scholar
  11. 60.
    James Barros, The Å land Islands Question: Its Settlement by the League of Nations (New Haven, CT, and London, UK: Yale University Press, 1968), 7.Google Scholar
  12. Kaarle Aho [Finnish language], “From Bomarsund to Paris: Å land and Northern Baltic Sea in the Diplomacy of the Crimean War.” Master’s thesis, University of Helsinki, 1995.Google Scholar
  13. 63.
    A. J. P. Taylor, The Struggle for Mastery in Modern Europe: 1848–1918 (Oxford, UK and New York: Oxford University Press, 1980 [1954]).Google Scholar
  14. 67.
    See, for example, Karl Meyer and Shareen Blair Brysac, Tournament of Shadows: the Great Game and the Race for Empire in Central Asia (Berkeley, CA: Counterpoint, 1999)Google Scholar
  15. Peter Hopkirk, The Great Game: the Struggle for Empire in Central Asia (London, UK: John Murray, 2006).Google Scholar
  16. 69.
    See, for example, Nikolai N. Bolkhovitinov, “The Sale of Alaska in the Context of Russo-American Relations in the Nineteenth Century,” in Hugh Ragsdale and Valerii Ponomarev, eds., Imperial Russian Foreign Policy (Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press and the Woodrow Wilson Center, 1993).Google Scholar
  17. 70.
    Natalia Kiseleva, In the Forefront of Memory: About the Siege of Petropavlovsk of 1854: Collection of Memoirs, Articles, Correspondence, and Official Documents (Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskii: Kamchatpress, 2010), 32.Google Scholar
  18. 71.
    See, for example, Fravel, M. Taylor. Strong Borders, Secure Nation: Cooperation and Conflict in China’s Territorial Disputes (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
  19. Rosemary K. Quested, Sino-Russian Relations: A Short History (London, UK: Routledge, 1984).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Andrew C. Rath 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew C. Rath

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations