Heroes of the Napoleonic Wars in the Ruling Elite of the Russian Empire

  • Grigorii Bibikov
Chapter
Part of the War, Culture and Society, 1750–1850 book series

Abstract

Fate took the Russian generals who had participated in the Napoleonic Wars in different directions. Many transferred to the civil service, became provincial governors or central government ministers, or held other top positions. This chapter aims to open up a scholarly debate on the position and role of military men in the political elite of the Russian Empire in the first half of the nineteenth century. In particular, an attempt is made to shed light on the following: first, to show how military men, particularly those who participated in the Napoleonic Wars, were represented in the ruling elite of the Russian Empire in the first half of the nineteenth century; second, to situate these findings within the broader context of the history of the ruling elite; third, and more broadly, to clarify the question of the reputation of minister-generals in society.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Liia Ia. Pavlova, Dekabristy — uchastniki voin 1805–1814 gg. (Moscow, 1979);Google Scholar
  2. Anastasiia G. Gotovtseva, ‘1812 god i zagranichnye pokhody v otsenke dekabrista Matveia Murav’ eva-Apostola’, in Epokha 1812 goda v sud’bakh Rossii i Evropy: mate-rialy mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii (Moskva, 8–11 oktiabria 2012 g.) (Moscow, 2013), 421–28.Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    These issues were dealt with in the early twentieth-century works celebrating the 100-year anniversary of the higher and central state institutions, and also in the biographies of individual statesmen. The following works merit particular attention: John Shelton Curtis, The Russian Army under Nicholas I, 1825–1855 (Durham, NC, 1965);Google Scholar
  4. Petr A. Zaionchkovskii, Pravitel’stvennyi apparat samoderzhavnoi Rossii v XIX v. (Moscow, 1978);Google Scholar
  5. W. Bruce Lincoln, ‘The Ministers of Nicholas I: A Brief Inquiry into Their Backgrounds and Service Careers’, Russian Review, 34, 3 (1975): 308–23; Idem, Nicholas I: Emperor and Autocrat of All the Russias (Bloomington, IN and London: 1978);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Walter M. Pintner, ‘The Russian Higher Civil Service on the Eve of the “Great Reforms”’, Journal of Social History, 8, 3 (1975): 55–68;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Walter Pintner and Don Karl Rooney, eds., Russian Officialdom: The Bureaucratization of Russian Society from the Seventeenth to the Twentieth Century (Chapel Hill, NC, 1980).Google Scholar
  8. 3.
    Aleksandr V. Nikitenko, Zapiski i dnevnik, vol. 1 (Moscow, 2005), 118.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    The data have been compiled from the analysis given in the following reference works: Denis N. Shilov, Gosudarstvennye deiateli Rossiiskoi imperi: glavy vysshikh i tsentral’nykh uchrezhdenii 1802–1917 (St Petersburg, 2001);Google Scholar
  10. Denis N. Shilov and Iu. A. Kuz’min, Chleny Gosudarstvennogo Soveta Rossiiskoi imperii. 1801–1906: biobib-liograficheskii spravochnik (St Petersburg, 2006); Otechestvennaia voina 1812 goda: entsiklopediia (Moscow, 2004); Zagranichnye pokhody rossiiskoi armii, 1813–1815 gody: entsiklopediia, 2 vols (Moscow, 2011).Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    Thus, Major General Alesksandr I. Mikhailovskii-Danilevskii made the following observation on his arrival at Petersburg in 1829: ‘I spent only ten days more in St Petersburg and found everything much changed; most of those who had had influence in the time of Alexander were there no longer, their places taken by others:’ Aleksandr I. Mikhailovskii-Danilevskii, ‘Zapiski A. I. Mikhailovskogo-Danilevskogo. 1829 god’, Russkaia starina, 7 (1893): 177.Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    O. V. Moriakova, Sistema mestnogo samoupravleniia v Rossii pri Nikolae I (Moscow, 1998), 42. According to Moriakova’s statistics, based on her study of the administrative cadres in the 15 provinces of central European Russia at the time of Nicholas I, 64.5 per cent of those appointed as civil governors were from a military background.Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    Petr A. Zaionchkovskii, ‘Gubernskaia administratsiia nakanune Krymskoi voiny’, Voprosy istorii, 9 (1975): 38.Google Scholar
  14. 15.
    Dominic Lieven, Aristokratiia v Evrope, 1815–1914 (St Petersburg, 2000), 264.Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    See Larisa G. Zakharova and Sergei V. Mironenko, eds., Perepiska tsesarevicha Aleksandra Nikolaevicha s imperatorom Nikolaem I, 1838–1839 (Moscow, 2008).Google Scholar
  16. 18.
    Otto de Bray, ‘Imperator Nikolai I i ego spodvizhniki (vospominaniia gr. Ottona de Bre. 1849–1852)’, Russkaia starina, 109, 1 (1902): 128.Google Scholar
  17. 19.
    Petr M. Zaionchkovskii, Vostochnaia voina v sviazi s sovremennoi ei politicheskoi obstanovkoi, 2 vols (Moscow, 2002), 1, 62.Google Scholar
  18. 22.
    Ivan N. Bozherianov, Graf Egor Frantsevich Kankrin, ego zhizn’, literaturnye trudy i dvadtsatiletniaia deiatel’nost’ upravleniia Ministerstvom finansov (St Petersburg, 1897), 40.Google Scholar
  19. 23.
    As cited in Alexei A. Krivopalov, ‘Fel’dmarshal I. F. Paskevich i problema strategii Rossii v Vostochnoi voine 1853–1856 gg’, Russkii sbornik: issledovaniia po istorii Rossii, 7 (Moscow, 2009): 254.Google Scholar
  20. 24.
    Andrei P. Zablotskii-Desiatovskii, Graf P. D. Kiselev i ego vremia, 3 vols (St Petersburg, 1882), 1, 21.Google Scholar
  21. 25.
    As cited in Mikhail A. Davydov, Oppozitsiia ego Velichestva (Moscow, 2005), 62–3.Google Scholar
  22. 26.
    Modest A. Korf, Dnevnik. god 1843-i (Moscow, 2004), 279.Google Scholar
  23. 27.
    Richard Wortman, Vlastiteli i sudii: Razvitie pravovogo soznaniia v imperatorskoi Rossii (Moscow, 2004), 67–8.Google Scholar
  24. 30.
    Walter M. Pintner, ‘The Russian Higher Civil Service on the Eve of the “Great Reforms”’, Journal of Social History, 8, 3 (1975): 63–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 33.
    W. Bruce Lincoln, In the Vanguard of Reform. Russia’s Enlightened Bureaucrats, 1825–1861 (DeKalb, IL, 1986), 7.Google Scholar
  26. 34.
    M. M. Shevchenko, ‘Istoricheskoe znachenie politicheskoi sistemy imperatora Nikolaia I: novaia tochka zreniia’, in Liubov’ I. Skripkina, ed., XIX vek v istorii Rossii: sovremennye kontseptsii istorii Rossii XIX veka i ikh muzeinaia interpretatsiia (Moscow, 2007), 288.Google Scholar
  27. 35.
    See, for example: Alexander M. Martin, ‘Russia and the legacy of 1812’, in The Cambridge History of Russia, vol. 2 (Cambridge, 2006);Google Scholar
  28. Vadim S. Parsamov, ‘K genezisu politicheskogo diskursa dekabristov; ideologema “narodnaia voin”’, in Oksana I. Kiianskaia, Mikhail P. Odesskii, eds., Dekabristy: aktual’nye problemy i novye podkhody (Moscow, 2008), 159–94.Google Scholar
  29. 37.
    Modest A. Korf, Zapiski (Moscow, 2003), 175–7.Google Scholar
  30. 38.
    Boris N. Chicherin, Moskva sorokovykh godov (Moscow, 1997), 77.Google Scholar
  31. 40.
    A. Ia. Storozhenko, ‘Otryvki iz vospominanii’, in Storozhenki. Famil’nyi arkhiv, vol. 1 (Kiev, 1902), 424, 428.Google Scholar
  32. 44.
    Mikhail A. Dmitriev, Glavy iz vospominanii moei zhizni (Moscow, 1998), 502.Google Scholar
  33. 45.
    Aleksei S. Khomiakov, Polnoe sobranie sochinenii, 8 vols (Moscow: 1900), 8, 179.Google Scholar
  34. 46.
    Sergei M. Solov’ev, ‘Iz zapisok S. M. Solov’eva’, in Sorokovye gody XIX veka v memuarakh sovremenikov. Dokumnetakh epokhi i khudozhestvennykh proizvedeniakh (Moscow, 1958), 26.Google Scholar
  35. 47.
    Dominic Lieven, Russia against Napoleon: The Battle for Europe, 1807 to 1814 (London, 2010).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Grigorii Bibikov 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Grigorii Bibikov

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations