Civil Service Reforms, Public Service Bargains and Dynamics of Institutional Change

  • Philippe Bezes
  • Martin Lodge
Chapter

Abstract

Following three decades of managerialist change and privatization, the aftermath of the financial crisis has launched another age of civil service reform. Initial responses to the age of austerity have been pay freezes and cuts, a further push towards outsourcing of public services, as well as, in some countries, extensive redundancies. Furthermore, decades of civil service reform across OECD and non-OECD countries have not led to a sense of stability: across countries, politicians are bemoaning the lack of a responsive civil service and a civil service that is ‘fit for purpose.’ Such calls for responsiveness contrast with those who argue that a ‘Weberian,’ ‘merit-based’ bureaucracy is at the heart of ‘good governance’ (see Dahlström, Lapuente and Teorell, 2012). The politics of austerity, climate change and aging populations will provide for further tension between the competing preferences for political responsiveness, on the one hand, and supposedly detached expertise, on the other (Lodge, 2013).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aberbach, J.A., R.D. Putnam and B.A. Rockman (1981) Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  2. Alba, C.A. and C. Navarro (2011) ‘Administrative Tradition and Reforms in Spain: Adaptation versus Innovation,’ Public Administration, 89(3), 783–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bach S. and L. Bordogna (2011) ‘Varieties of New Public Management or Alternative Models? The Reform of Public Service Employment Relations in Industrialized Democracies,’ International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(11), 2281–2294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bach, S. and R. Kolins Givan (2011) ‘Varieties of New Public Management? The Reform of Public Service Employment Relations in the UK and USA,’ International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(11), 2349–2366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bezes, P. (2001) ‘Defensive vs Offensive Approaches to Administrative Reform in France (1988–1997): The Leadership Dilemmas of French Prime Ministers,’ Governance, 14(1), 99–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bezes, P. (2007) ‘The Hidden Politics of Administrative Reform: Cutting French Civil Service Wages With a Low-Profile Instrument,’ Governance, 20(1), 23–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bezes, P. (2009) Réinventer l’État. Les réformes de l’administration française (1962–2008) (Paris: PUF).Google Scholar
  8. Bezes, P. (2012) ‘The Macro-Politics of Managerialism: Revisiting Weberian Perspectives,’ in M. Lodge and K. Wegrich (eds) Executive Politics in Times of Crisis (London: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 63–80.Google Scholar
  9. Bezes, P. and G. Jeannot (2011) ‘The Development and Current Features of the French Civil Service System,’ in F.M. van der Meer (ed.) Civil Service Systems in Western Europe (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), pp. 185–216.Google Scholar
  10. Bezes, P. and P. Le Lidec (2007) ‘French Top Civil Servants Within Changing Configurations From Monopolisation to Challenged Places and Roles?’ in E.C. Page and V. Wright (eds) From the Active to the Enabling State: The Changing Role of Top Officials in European Nations (London: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 121–163.Google Scholar
  11. Bezes, P. and S. Parrado (2013) ‘Trajectories of Administrative Reform: Institutions, Timing and Choices in France and Spain,’ West European Politics, 36(1), 22–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boin, A. (2009) ‘The New World of Crises and Crisis Management,’ Review of Policy Studies, 26(4), 367–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bordogna, L. (2008) ‘Moral Hazard, Transaction Costs and the Reform of Public Service Employment Relations,’ European Journal of Industrial Relations, 14(4), 381–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bordogna, L. and S. Neri (2011) ‘Convergence Towards an NPM Programme or Different Models? Public Service Employment Relations in Italy and France,’ International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(11), 2311–2330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Boston, J., J. Martin, J. Pallot and P. Walsh (eds) (1991) Reshaping the State: New Zealand’s Bureaucratic Revolution (Auckland: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  16. Brans, M. and A. Hondeghem (2005) ‘Competency Frameworks in The Belgian Governments: Causes, Construction and Contents,’ Public Administration, 83(4), 823–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Capano, G. (2003) ‘Administrative Traditions and Policy Change: When Policy Paradigms Matter: The Case of Italian Administrative Reform During the 1990s,’ Public Administration, 81, 781–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cassese, S. (2002) ‘Le nouveau régime de la haute function publique en Italie. Une modification constitutionnelle,’ Revue française d’administration publique, 104(4), 677–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chevallier, J. (2010) ‘Révision générale des politiques publiques et gestion des ressources humaines,’ Revue française d’administration publique, 136, 907–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Christensen T. and P. Lægreid (2007) ‘The Whole-of-Government Approach to Public Sector Reform,’ Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Christensen, T. (2012) ‘Global Ideas and Modern Public Sector Reforms: A Theoretical Elaboration and Empirical Discussion of a Neoinstitutional Theory,’ American Review of Public Administration, 42(6), 635–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Christensen, T. and P. Lægreid (eds) (2002) New Public Management: The Transformation of Ideas and Practice (Aldershot: Ashgate).Google Scholar
  23. Clemens, E.S. and J.M. Cook (1999) ‘Politics and Institutionalism: Explaining Durability and Change,’ Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 441–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dahlström, C. and B. Niklasson (2013) ‘The Politics of Politicization in Sweden,’ Public Administration, 91(4), 891–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dahlström, C., V. Lapuente and J. Teorell (2012) ‘The Merit of Meritocratization: Politics, Bureaucracy, and the Institutional Deterrents of Corruption,’ Political Research Quarterly, 65(3), 658–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. de Visscher, C. and H.H. Salomonsen (2013) ‘Explaining Differences in Ministerial Ménages à Trois: Multiple Bargains in Belgium and Denmark,’ International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(1), 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. de Visscher C., A. Hondeghem, C. Montuelle and K. Van Dorpe (2011) ‘The Changing Public Service Bargain in the Federal Administration in Belgium,’ Public Policy and Administration, Sage Publications Ltd., 26, 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Di Mascio, F., A. Natalini and F. Stolfi (2013) ‘The Ghost of the Crises Past. Analysing Reform Sequences to Understand Italy’s response to the Global Crisis,’ Public Administration, 91(1), 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Eichbaum, C. and R. Shaw (2008) ‘Revisiting Politicization: Political Advisers and Public Servants in Westminster Systems,’ Governance, 21(3), 337–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar
  31. Eymeri, J.-M. (2012) ‘Les concours à l’épreuve,’ Revue française d’administration publique, 142(2), 307–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Foster, C. (2005) British Government in Crisis (Oxford: Hart).Google Scholar
  33. Gally, N. (2012) Le marché des hauts fonctionnaires. Une comparaison des politiques de la haute fonction publique en France et en Grande-Bretagne (Paris: Thèse de doctorat, Institut d’Etudes Politiques de Paris).Google Scholar
  34. Gervais, J. (2010) ‘Merging to Survive? Institutional Legitimacy and Material Considerations in the Light of the Reorganization of Corps Within the French Civil Service,’ International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(3), 425–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gregory, R. and J.G. Christensen (2004) ‘Similar Ends, Differing Means: Contractualism and Civil Service Reform in Denmark and New Zealand,’ Governance, January, 59–82.Google Scholar
  36. Hacker, J.S. ‘Policy Drift: The Hidden Politics of US Welfare State Retrenchment,’ in W. Streeck and K. Thelen (eds) Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 40–82.Google Scholar
  37. Hall, P.A. and D. Soskice (eds) (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  38. Heady, F. (1996) ‘Configurations of Civil Service Systems,’ in A. Hans, G.M. Bekke, J.L. Perry and T.J. Toonen (eds) Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective (Indiana, IN: Indiana University Press), pp. 207–226.Google Scholar
  39. Heywood, P. and V. Wright (1997) ‘Executives, Bureaucracies and Decision-Making,’ in M. Rhodes, P. Heywood and V. Wright (eds) Developments in West European Politics (Basingstoke: Macmillan), pp. 75–94.Google Scholar
  40. Hogwood, B.W. (1993) ‘Restructuring Central Government: The Next Steps Initiative In Britain,’ in J. Kooiman (ed.) Managing Public Organisations (London: Sage), pp. 207–223.Google Scholar
  41. Hondeghem, A. and T. Steen (2013) ‘Evolving Public Service Bargains for Top Officials: Some International Comparisons. Introduction for the Special Issue on Public Service Bargains,’ International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(1), 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hondeghem, A., S. Horton and S. Scheepers (2005) ‘Modèles de gestion des compétences en Europe,’ Revue française d’administration publique, 116, 561–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hood, C. (1991) ‘A Public Management for All Seasons?’ Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hood, C. (1995) ‘Contemporary Public Management: A New Global Paradigm?’ Public Policy and Administration, (10)2, 104–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hood, C. and R. Dixon (2013) ‘A Model of Cost-Cutting in Government? The Great Management Revolution in UK Central Government Considered,’ Public Administration, 91(1), 114–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hood, C. and M. Lodge (2004) ‘Competency, Bureaucracy and the Orthodoxies of Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis,’ Governance, 17, 313–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hood, C. and M. Lodge (2005) ‘Aesop with Variations: Civil Service Competency as Case of German Tortoise and British Hare?’ Public Administration, 83, 805–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hood, C. and M. Lodge (2006) The Politics of Public Service Bargains: Reward, Competency, Loyalty and Blame (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hood, C. and B.G. Peters (eds) (1994) Rewards at the Top: A Comparative Study of High Public Office (London: Sage).Google Scholar
  50. Hood, C. and B.G. Peters with G. Lee (eds) (2003) Reward for High Public Office: Asian and Pacific Rim States (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  51. Ibsen, C.L., T.P. Larsen, J.S. Madsen and J. Due (2011) ‘Challenging Scandinavian Employment Relations: The Effects of New Public Management Reforms,’ International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(11), 2295–2310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ingraham, P. and H. Getha-Taylor (2005) ‘Common Sense, Competence, and Talent in the Public Service in the USA,’ Public Administration, 83(4), 789–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Knill, C. (1999) ‘Explaining Cross-National Variance in Administrative Reform: Autonomous versus Instrumental Bureaucracies,’ Journal of Public Policy, 19, 113–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lewis, D.E. (2008) The Politics of Presidential Appointments: Political Control and Bureaucratic Performance (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lewis, D.E. (2012) ‘Presidential Politicization of the Executive Branch in the United States,’ in Martin Lodge and Kai Wegrich (eds) Executive Politics in Times of Crisis (Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
  56. Lipson, L. (1947) The Politics of Inequality (Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press).Google Scholar
  57. Lodge, M. (2012) ‘Rewards at the Top in UK Central Government,’ in M. Brans and B.G. Peters (eds) Rewards for High Political Office in Europe and Northern America (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  58. Lodge, M. (2013) ‘Crisis, Resources, and the State: Executive Politics in the Age of the Depleted State,’ Political Studies Review, 11(3), 378–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lodge, M. and D. Gill (2010) ‘Toward a New Era of Administrative Reform? The Myth of Post-NPM in New Zealand,’ Governance, 24(1), 141–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lodge, M. and C. Hood (2003) ‘Competency and Bureaucracy: Diffusion, Application and Appropriate Response?’ West European Politics, 26, 131–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lodge, M. and C. Hood (2012) ‘Into an Age of Multiple Austerities? Public Management and Public Service Bargains across OECD Countries,’ Governance, 25(1), 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mahoney, J. and K. Thelen (eds) (2010) Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  63. Mair, P., P. Kopecky and M. Spirova (eds) (2012) Party Patronage and Party Government: Public Appointments and Political Control in European Democracies (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  64. Meyer-Sahling, J.H. (2011) ‘The Durability of EU Civil Service Policy in Central and Eastern Europe after Accession,’ Governance, 24(2), 231–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Meyer-Sahling, J.H. and K. Yesilkagit (2011) ‘Differential Legacy Effects: Three Propositions on the Impact of Administrative Traditions on Public Administration Reform in Europe East and West,’ Journal of European Public Policy, 18(2), 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Moynihan, D.P. (2004) ‘Protection versus Flexibility. The Civil Service Reform Act. Competing Administrative Doctrines and the Roots of Contemporary Public Management Debate,’ Journal of Policy History, 16(1), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ongaro, E. (2009) Public Management Reform and Modernization: Trajectories of Administrative Change in Italy, France, Greece, Portugal and Spain (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ongaro, E. (2011) ‘The Role of Politics and Institutions in the Italian Administrative Reform Trajectory,’ Public Administration, 89(3), 738–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Page, E.C. (1991) Localism and Centralism in Europe: The Political and Legal Bases of Local Self-government (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Page, E.C. (1992) Political Authority and Bureaucratic Power: A Comparative Analysis (New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf).Google Scholar
  71. Page, E.C. (1995) ‘Administering Europe,’ in J. Hayward and E.C. Page (eds) Governing the New Europe (Oxford: Polity Press), pp. 257–285.Google Scholar
  72. Painter, M. and B.G. Peters (eds) (2010) Tradition and Public Administration (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
  73. Parrado, S. (2008) ‘Failed Policies but Institutional Innovation through “Layering” and “Diffusion” in Spanish Central Administration,’ International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(2), 230–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Peters, B.G. (1987) ‘Politicians and Bureaucrats in the Politics of Policy-making,’ in J.-E. Lane (ed.) Bureaucracy and Public Choice (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications), pp. 256–282.Google Scholar
  75. Peters, B.G. (2001) The Politics of Bureaucracy, 5th edn (New York: Longman).Google Scholar
  76. Peters, B.G. and J. Pierre (eds) (2004) Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective: A Quest for Control (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  77. Pierre, J. (2004) ‘Politicization of the Swedish Civil Service,’ in B.G. Peters and J. Pierre (eds) Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective: A Quest for Control (London: Routledge), pp. 41–54.Google Scholar
  78. Pierson, P. (ed.) (2000) The New Politics of the Welfare State (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  79. Pierson, P. (2004) Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  80. Pollitt, C. and G. Bouckaert (2011) Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis — New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo- Weberian State, 3rd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  81. Power, M. (1999) The Audit Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Power, M. (2007) Organized Uncertainty (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  83. Rhodes, R.A.W. (2011) Everyday Life in British Government (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  84. Savoie, D. (2003) Breaking the Bargain (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).Google Scholar
  85. Savoie, D. (2008) Court Government and the Collapse of Accountability in Canada and the United Kingdom (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).Google Scholar
  86. Schaffer, B. (1973) The Administrative Factor (London: Frank Cass).Google Scholar
  87. Silberman, B.S. (1993) Cages of Reason: The Rise of the Rational State in France, Japan, The United States and Great Britain (Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press).Google Scholar
  88. Simon, H. (1947) Administrative Behavior (New York: Free Press).Google Scholar
  89. Streeck, W. and K. Thelen (eds) (2005) Beyond Continuities. Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  90. Thelen, K. (2003) ‘How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis,’ in J. Mahoney and D. Rueschemeyer (eds) Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 208–240.Google Scholar
  91. Truss, C. (2008) ‘Continuity and Change: The Role of the HR Function in the Modern Public Sector,’ Public Administration, 86(4), 1071–1088.Google Scholar
  92. Van der Meer, F.M. and R.L.J. Roborgh (1996) ‘Civil Servants and Representativeness,’ in A. Hans, G.M. Bekke, J.L. Perry and T.J. Toonen (eds) Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective (Indiana, IN: Indiana University Press), pp. 119–133.Google Scholar
  93. Van der Meer, F.M. and T. Toonen (2005) ‘Competency Management and Civil Service Professionalism in Dutch Central Government,’ Public Administration, 83(4), 839–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Van Thiel, S. (2012) ‘Party Patronage in the Netherlands,’ in P. Mair, P. Kopecky and M. Spirova (eds) Party Patronage and Party Government: Public Appointments and Political Control in European Democracies (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 250–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Vaughan-Whitehead, D. (ed.) (2013) Public Sector Shock: The Impact of Policy Retrenchment in Europe (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
  96. Wise, L.R. (1996) ‘Internal Labor Markets,’ in A. Hans, G.M. Bekke, J.L. Perry and T.J. Toonen (eds) Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective (Indiana, IN: Indiana University Press), pp. 100–118.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Philippe Bezes and Martin Lodge 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philippe Bezes
  • Martin Lodge

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations