Advertisement

Civil Servants in the Enabling Framework State of the 21st Century

  • Jos C. N. Raadschelders
  • Theo A. J. Toonen
  • Frits M. Van der Meer
Chapter

Abstract

Many observations in this volume concern changes and transformations in civil service systems (CSS), which have been defined as ‘mediating institutions for the mobilization of human resources in the service of the state in a given territory’ (Bekke, Perry and Toonen 1996: 2). How they work and operate has changed considerably in recent years. Whatever the nature of these changes, the desire for a solid and reliable civil service, based on the rule of law, has been pivotal to public sector reforms in various regions of the world, and certainly in Central and Eastern Europe, Asia and Africa. In Western Europe and Anglo-American countries, the reform efforts were more focused on establishing a flexible CSS by means of New Public Management reforms. Where systems have not been able to achieve solid results in developing and maintaining a CSS strategy aimed at reform, especially when such reforms are not anchored in a Rechtsstaat tradition, deformation and regression have become more likely outcomes than reform and progression.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carpenter, Daniel P. (2001) The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  2. Du Gay, Paul (2000) In Praise of Bureaucracy: Weber — Organization — Ethics (London: Sage).Google Scholar
  3. Frederickson, David G. and H. George Frederickson (2006) Measuring the Performance of the Hollow State (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press).Google Scholar
  4. Gale, Scott A. and Ralph P. Hummel (2003) ‘A Debt Unpaid — Reinterpreting Max Weber on Bureaucracy,’ Administrative Theory & Praxis, 25, 409–418.Google Scholar
  5. Hegel, G.W.F. (1991) Elements of the Philosophy of Right (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  6. Hood, C. (1990) ‘De-Sir Humphreying the Westminster Model of Bureaucracy,’ Governance, 3, 205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jackson, M.W. (1986) ‘Bureaucracy in Hegel’s Political Theory,’ Administration & Society, 18, 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Melchor, Oscar Huerta (2013) The Government Workforce of the Future. Innovation in Strategic Workforce Planning in OECD Countries. OECD Papers on Public Governance, no. 21 (Paris: OECD Publishing).Google Scholar
  9. Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik (2012) Civil Service Professionalisation in the Western Balkans. SIGMA Papers, no. 48 (Paris: OECD Publishing).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Minister for the Cabinet Office (2004) A Draft Civil Service Bill: A Consultation Document (London: The Stationery Office).Google Scholar
  11. Page, Edward C. and Vincent Wright (eds) (2007) The Changing Role of Senior Service in Europe (Houndmills: Palgrave).Google Scholar
  12. Pentland, Alex (2013) Social Physics: How Good Ideas Spread — The Lessons from a New Science (New York: Penguin Press).Google Scholar
  13. Rhodes, R.A.W. (2005) ‘Australia: The Westminster Model as Tradition,’ in Haig Patapan, John Wanna and Patrick Weller (eds) Westminster Legacies: Democracy and Responsible Government in Asia and the Pacific (Sydney: University of New South Wales Press), pp. 129–152.Google Scholar
  14. Self, Peter (1979) Administrative Theories and Politics: An Enquiry into the Structure and Process of Modern Government (London: Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar
  15. Shaw, Carl K.Y. (1992) ‘Hegel’s Theory of Modern Bureaucracy,’ American Political Science Review, 86, 381–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Spicer, Michael W. (2004) ‘Note on Origins: Hegel, Weber, and Frederician Prussia,’ Administrative Theory & Praxis, 26, 97–102.Google Scholar
  17. Widner, Ralph R. (2006) Civil Service Reforms and International Assistance: A Draft Framework to Help Distill Lessons Learned. Draft Paper Presented at NAPA Meeting, January 25, 2007 (Washington, DC: National Academy of Public Administration).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Jos C.N. Raadschelders, Theo A.J. Toonen and Frits M. Van der Meer 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jos C. N. Raadschelders
  • Theo A. J. Toonen
  • Frits M. Van der Meer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations