Theories on ASEAN Security

  • Angela Pennisi di Floristella
Chapter
Part of the New Security Challenges Series book series

Abstract

Theoretical debates on whether or not ASEAN matters in the realm of security, are quite recent. Until the 1990s students of Southeast Asian affairs were unwilling to go out on a limb with theory and prediction,1 and even theoretically-oriented scholars cast doubts on the usefulness of theories on Asia.2 Over the last two decades, this picture has changed profoundly, and a prolific debate centered on a crucial question first raised by Kivimäki in ‘Power, Interest or Culture — is there a paradigm that explains the ASEAN political role best?,’3 has opened up. In an attempt to answer this question two major perspectives, realism and constructivism, have emerged in both academic and policy debates. While acknowledging that there are important insights to be gained from both perspectives, this monograph adopts the less common neoliberal institutionalist perspective as a mirror that reflects the state of security cooperation in Southeast Asia and by which its limits can be identified.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    D. Emmerson (1987) ‘ASEAN as an international regime,’ Journal of International Affairs, 41 (1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Acharya (2008) ‘Theoretical Perspectives…, p. 57.Google Scholar
  3. See also A. Acharya and B. Buzan (2007) ‘Why there is Non Western IR theory: an introduction,’ International Relations of the Asia Pacific, 7, 287–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 3.
    T. Kivimäki (2008) ‘Power, Interest or Culture — is there a paradigm that explains ASEAN political role best?,’ The Pacific Review, 21 (4), 431–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 4.
    T. Dunne and B. Schmidt (2014) ‘Realism’ in J. Baylis, S. Smith and P. Owen (eds) The Globalization of World Politics. An Introduction to International Relations, 6th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p. 103.Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    J. Grieco, J. Ikenberry and M. Mastanduno (2015) Introduction to International Relations. Enduring Questions and Contemporary Perspectives (New York: Palgrave Macmillan), p. 72.Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    J. Grieco, J. Ikenberry and M. Mastanduno (2015) Introduction to… CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 7.
    This form of scholarship is best represented in the works of: M. Leifer (1989) Asean and the Security of Southeast Asia (London: Routledge);Google Scholar
  9. N. Khoo (2004) ‘Deconstructing the ASEAN security community: a review essay,’ International Relations of the Asia Pacific, 4 (1), 35–46;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. D. Martin Jones and M. Smith (2006) ASEAN and East Asian International Relations. Regional Delusion (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. D. Martin Jones and M. Smith (2002) ‘ASEAN’s imitation community,’ Orbis, 46 (1), 109–26.Google Scholar
  12. 8.
    S. Walt (1985) ‘Alliance formation and the balance of world power,’ International Security, 9 (4), 3–43;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Walt (1987) The Origins of Alliances (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
  14. 9.
    K. Waltz (1979) Theory of International Politics (Reading, Mass.: Addison Wesley).Google Scholar
  15. 10.
    A. Acharya (2008) ‘Theoretical Perspectives…, p. 63.Google Scholar
  16. 11.
    A. Acharya (2008) ‘Theoretical Perspectives…Google Scholar
  17. 12.
    T. Dunne and B. Schmidt (2014) ‘Realism…Google Scholar
  18. 13.
    R. Schweller (1994) ‘Bandwagoning for profit: bringing the Revisionist State Back,’ International Security, 19 (1), 72–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 14.
    J.J. Park (2011) ‘The US-led alliances in the Asia-Pacific: hedge against potential threats or an undesirable multilateral security order?,’ The Pacific Review, 24 (2), 137–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 15.
    M. Leifer (1989) Asean and… Google Scholar
  21. 16.
    J. Grieco, J. Ikenberry and M. Mastanduno (2015) Introduction to… CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 18.
    M. Caballero Anthony (2014) ‘Understanding ASEAN’s centrality: bases and prospects in an evolving regional architecture,’ The Pacific Review, 27 (4), 563–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 19.
    A. Friedberg (1993/4) ‘Ripe for rivalry: prospects for peace in a multipolar Asia,’ International Security, 18 (3), 5–33;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. A. Friedberg (2000) ‘Will Europe’s past be Asia’s future?,’ Survival, 42 (3), 147–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 21.
    A. Wendt (1992) ‘Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics,’ International Organization, 46 (2), 391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 22.
    For the debate on realist/neorealist/constructivists see for example: A. Batabyal (2004) ‘ASEAN’s quest for security: a theoretical explanation,’ International Studies, 41 (4), 349–69; S. Eaton and R. Stubbs (2006) ‘Is ASEAN powerful?… Constructivist scholarship spread over Asian studies through, inter alia, the works of: Acharya (2009a) Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia…;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. M. Caballero Anthony (2005) Regional Security in Southeast Asia. Beyond the ASEAN way (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies);Google Scholar
  28. A. Ba (2008) ‘Who is Socializing Whom? Complex Engagement in Sino-ASEAN Relations’ in A. Acharya and R. Stubbs (eds) Theorizing Southeast Asian Relations. Emerging Debates (London: Routledge);Google Scholar
  29. P. Katzenstein (2005) A World of Regions…;Google Scholar
  30. P. Heng (2009) ‘A constructivist perspective of the regional order in Southeast Asia: norms transformation in ASEAN and the ASEAN charter,’ Tamkang Journal of International Relations, 13 (2), 1–32;Google Scholar
  31. T. Kivimäki (2001) ‘The long peace of ASEAN,’ Journal of Peace Research, 38 (1), 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 23.
    A. Wendt (1992) ‘Anarchy is what states makes of it…Google Scholar
  33. 24.
    A. Batabyal (2004) ‘ASEAN’s quest for security…Google Scholar
  34. 25.
    K. Deutsch (1961) ‘Security Communities’ in J. Rosenau (ed.) International Politics and Foreign Policy (New York: Free Press), p. 98.Google Scholar
  35. See also: K. Deutsch, S. Burrell and R. Kann (1957) Political Community in the North Atlantic Area (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  36. 26.
    A. Acharya (2009a) Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia…, pp. 28–9.Google Scholar
  37. 27.
    A. Acharya (2005) ‘Do norms and identity matter? Community and Power in Southeast Asian regional order,’ The Pacific Review, 18 (1), 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 28.
    ASEAN Secretariat (2007a) The ASEAN Charter (ASEAN Secretariat: Jakarta). http://www.asean.org/archive/publications/ASEAN-Charter.pdf, date accessed 5 August 2014.Google Scholar
  39. 29.
    R. Severino (2001a) ‘Asia Policy Lecture: What ASEAN Is and What It Stands for’ in R. Severino (ed.) Asean Faces the Future. Collection of Speeches (Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat), p. 22.Google Scholar
  40. 30.
    Acharya (2009b) Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia… Google Scholar
  41. 32.
    N. Tarling (2000) Historians and Southeast Asian History (Auckland: NZ Asia Institute);Google Scholar
  42. C. Roberts (2011) ‘Region and identity: the many facets of Southeast Asia,’ Asian Politics and Polity, 3 (3), 365–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 33.
    C. Roberts (2011) ‘Region and identity…Google Scholar
  44. 34.
    A. Reid (1988) Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce, 1450–1680 (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
  45. 35.
    P. Chachavalpongpun (2006) ‘Insider’s Insights into ASEAN and its future,’ The Nation, 14 October; For a critical point of view on the issue of ASEAN identity see also: K. Jönsson (2009) ‘Unity-in-diversity? Regional Identity-building in Southeast Asia,’ Journal of Current Southeast Asia, 29 (2), 41–72;Google Scholar
  46. P. Saihoo (1992) ‘Problems In Cultural Development’ in K. S. Sandhu, S. Siddique, C. Jeshurun, A. Rajah, J. Tan and P. Thambipillai (eds) The ASEAN Reader (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies), pp. 136–40.Google Scholar
  47. 37.
    R. Sukma (2008) ‘Building the ASEAN community,’ The Indonesian Quarterly, 36 (3/4), 258–77.Google Scholar
  48. 39.
    B. Welsh (2013) ‘Divided or together? …Google Scholar
  49. 40.
    A. Wulan and B. Bandoro (2007) ASEAN’s Quest…, p. 71.Google Scholar
  50. 41.
    N. Ganesan (1995) ‘Testing neoliberal institutionalism in Southeast Asia,’ International Journal. The Tuture of NATO, 50 (4), 779–804;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. S. Simon (1994) ‘Realism and neoliberalism: international relations theory and Southeast Asian security,’ The Pacific Review, 8 (1), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 42.
    E. Solingen (2008) ‘The genesis, design and effects of regional institutions: lessons from East Asia and the Middle East,’ International Studies Quarterly, 52, 261–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 43.
    S. Krasner (1982) ‘Structural causes and regime consequences: regime as intervening variables,’ International Organization, 36 (2), 185–205, p. 186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 44.
    R. O. Keohane and L. Martin (1995) ‘The promise of institutionalist theory,’ International Security, 20 (1), 39–51, p. 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 45.
    S. Lamy (2011) ‘Neo-realism and Neo-liberalism’ in J. Baylis, S. Smith and P. Owens (eds) The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 185–94.Google Scholar
  56. In this regard, see: R. O. Keohane and N. Nye (1977) Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition (Boston: Little Brown).Google Scholar
  57. 46.
    S. Lamy (2011) ‘Neo-realism and…Google Scholar
  58. 47.
    S. Narine (1998a) ‘Institutional theory and Southeast Asia: the case of ASEAN,’ World Affairs, 161 (1), 33–47.Google Scholar
  59. 48.
    M. Leiter as quoted by J. C. Liow and R. Emmers (2006) ‘Introduction’ in J. C. Liow and R. Emmers (eds) Order and Security in South East Asia. Essays in Memory of Michael Leifer (New York: Routledge), p. 4.Google Scholar
  60. 49.
    M. Finnemore (1996) ‘Norms, culture and world politics: insights from sociology’s institutionalism,’ International Organization, 50 (2), 325–47;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. L. Martin and B. Simmons (1998) ‘Theories and empirical studies of international institutions,’ International Organization, 52, (4), 729–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 50.
    C. Wallander, H. Haftenforn and R. O. Keohane (1999) ‘Introduction’ in Imperfect Unions. Security Institutions Over Time and Space (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p. 8.Google Scholar
  63. 51.
    A. Acharya (2008) ‘Theoretical Perspectives…, p. 68.Google Scholar
  64. 52.
    A. Acharya (2008) ‘Theoretical Perspectives… p. 58.Google Scholar
  65. 53.
    M. Alagappa (2003) Asian Security Order: Instrumental and Normative Features (Stanford: Stanford University Press);Google Scholar
  66. P. Katzenstein and R. Sil (2004) ‘Rethinking Asian Security: A Case for Analytical Ecclectism’ in J. Suh, P. Katzenstein and A. Carlson (eds) Rethinking Security in East Asia: Identity, Power and Efficiency (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
  67. 54.
    A. Hasenclever, P. Mayer and V. Rittberg (2000) ‘Integrating theories of international regimes,’ Review of International Studies, 26 (1), 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 55.
    K. He (2006) ‘Does ASEAN matter? international relations theories, institutional realism and ASEAN,’ Asian Security, 2 (3), 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 56.
    J. Grieco, J. Ikenberry and M. Mastanduno (2015) Introduction to… CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 57.
    ASEAN Secretariat (1992b) Joint Communiqué 25th ASEAN Ministerial Meeting, Manila, Philippines, 21–22 July, http://www.asean.org/commu-nities/asean-political-security-community/item/joint-communique-25-th-asean-ministerial-meeting-manila-philippines-21–22-july-1992, date accessed 1 July 2014.Google Scholar
  71. 58.
    See for example the studies of: R. Emmers (2003a) Cooperative Security and the Balance of Power in Asean and the ARF (London: Routledge Curzon);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. H. Katsumata (2009a) ASEAN’s Cooperative Security Enterprise, Norms and Interests in the ASEAN Regional Forum (New York: Palgrave Macmillan);Google Scholar
  73. A. Acharya (2007) ‘Regional institutions and security in the Asia Pacific: evolution, adaptation and prospects for transformation’ in A. Acharya and E. Goh (eds) Reassessing Security Cooperation in the Asia Pacific: Competition, Congruence and Transformation (BCSIA Studies in International Security: MIT Press), pp. 19–39.Google Scholar
  74. 59.
    D. B. Dewitt and P. M. Evans (1993) The Agenda for Cooperative Security in the North Pacific: Conference Report (Toronto: York University.)Google Scholar
  75. 60.
    D. Capie and P. Evans (2002) The Asia-Pacific Security Lexicon (Singapore: the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies), p. 98.Google Scholar
  76. 62.
    G. Evans (1994) ‘Cooperative security and intrastate conflict,’ Foreign Policy, 96, 3–20, p. 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 63.
    L. Dunn (2009) ‘The Role of Cooperative Security’ in J. Larsen and J. Wirtz (eds) Arms Control and Cooperative Security (Boulder: Lynne Rienner).Google Scholar
  78. 64.
    L. Dunn (2009) ‘The Role of Cooperative Security…Google Scholar
  79. 67.
    C. A. Kupchan and C. A. Kupchan (1991) ‘Concerts, collective security, and the future of Europe,’ International Security, 16 (1), 114–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 69.
    K. Deutsch, S. Burrell and R. Kann (1957) Political Community… Google Scholar
  81. 70.
    E. Adler and M. Barnett (1988) Security Communities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  82. 71.
    F. Attinà (2006) ‘The Building of Regional Security Partnership…;Google Scholar
  83. F. Attinà (2007) ‘The European Security Partnership…;Google Scholar
  84. F. Attinà (2011) The Global Political System (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 134–37.Google Scholar
  85. 72.
    G. Crawford (2003) ‘Partnership or power? deconstructing the “partnership for governance” reform in Indonesia,’ Third World Quarterly, 24 (1), pp. 139–59;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. S. Maxwell and R. Riddell (1998) ‘Conditionality or contract: perspective on partnership for development,’ Journal of International Development, 10, 257–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 73.
    F. Attinà (2006) ‘The Building of Regional Security Partnership…;Google Scholar
  88. F. Attinà (2007) ‘The European Security Partnership…;Google Scholar
  89. F. Attinà (2011) The Global Political… Google Scholar
  90. 76.
    F. Attinà (2006) ‘The Building of Regional Security Partnership…;Google Scholar
  91. F. Attinà (2007) ‘The European Security Partnership…;Google Scholar
  92. F. Attinà (2011) The Global Political… Google Scholar
  93. 78.
    D. Emmerson (2008) ‘Critical Terms, Security Democracy…Google Scholar
  94. 79.
    C. K. Wah (2000) ‘Reflections on the Shaping of Strategic Cultures in Southeast Asia’ in D. De Cunha (ed.) Southeast Asian Perspectives on Security (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies).Google Scholar
  95. 80.
    C. K. Wah (2000) ‘Reflections on the Shaping…;Google Scholar
  96. D. Emmerson (2008) ‘Critical Terms, Security Democracy…Google Scholar
  97. 81.
    R. Sukma (2008) ‘Building the ASEAN…, p. 264.Google Scholar
  98. 82.
    M. Leifer (2005) ‘ASEAN’s Search for Regional Order’ in M. Leifer, K. Chin Wah, L. Suryadinata (eds) Micheal Leifer: Selected Works on Southeast Asia (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies).Google Scholar
  99. 83.
    S. Rajaratnam (2006) ‘The Dominoes Did Not Fall’ in K. C. Guan (ed.) S. Rajaratnam on Singapore: From Ideas to Reality (Singapore: World Scientific Publishing), p. 104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 84.
    M. Antolik (1990) ASEAN and the Diplomacy of…, p. 16.Google Scholar
  101. 86.
    M. Antolik (1990) ASEAN and the Diplomacy of…, p. 40.Google Scholar
  102. 87.
    L. Jones (2010) ‘ASEAN’s unchanged melody? The theory and practice of non interference in Southeast Asia,’ The Pacific Review, 23 (4), 479–502;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. L. Jones (2012) ASEAN, Sovereignty and Intervention in Southeast Asia (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
  104. 88.
    L. Jones (2010) ‘ASEAN’s unchanged…;Google Scholar
  105. L. Jones (2012) ASEAN, Sovereignty… Google Scholar
  106. 90.
    M. Antolik (1990) ASEAN and the Diplomacy of…, p. 15.Google Scholar
  107. 92.
    ASEAN Secretariat (1976a) Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia, 24 February, http://www.asean.org/news/item/treaty-of-amity-and-cooperation-in-southeast-asia-indonesia-24-lebruary-1976–3, date accessed 20 July 2014.Google Scholar
  108. 93.
    B. Kumoro (2013) ‘Indonesia, Islam and democracy’ The Indonesian Quarterly, 41 (1) 28–37, p. 34.Google Scholar
  109. 94.
    M. Alagappa (2014) ‘Thailand’s coup: prologue to breaking the impasse?,’ PacNet, 40, Honolulu: Pacific Forum CSIS, 27 May.Google Scholar
  110. 96.
    J. Dosch (2008) ‘Sovereignty Rules: Human Security, Civil Society and the Limits of Liberal Reform’ in D. Emmerson (ed.) Hard Choices: Security, Democracy…, p. 70.Google Scholar
  111. 97.
    M. Caballero Anthony (2010a) ‘Conclusion. Reflections on Political Change, Democratic Transitions, and Regional Security in Southeast Asia’ in M. Caballero Anthony (ed.) Political Change, Democratic Transition and Security in Southeast Asia (New York: Routledge), p. 139.Google Scholar
  112. 103.
    ASEAN Secretariat (1997a) ASEAN Vision Kuala Lumpur, 15 December, http://www.asean.org/news/item/asean-vision-2020, date accessed 8 June 2014.Google Scholar
  113. 104.
    A. Jetschke and J. Rüland (2009) ‘Decoupling rhetoric and practise: the cultural limits of ASEAN cooperation,’ The Pacific Review, 22 (2), 179–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 105.
    S. Simon (2008a) ‘Southeast Asian security and its influential “others”,’ The Indonesian Quarterly, 36 (3/4), 369–86.Google Scholar
  115. 106.
    R. Sukma (2010a) ‘ASEAN and Regional Security in East Asia’ in W. Hofmaister (ed.) Security Politics in Asia and Europe (Singapore: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung).Google Scholar
  116. 107.
    R. Attinà (2007) ‘The European Security Partnership…Google Scholar
  117. 108.
    J. Rosenau (1997) Along the Domestic-foreign Frontier: Exploring Governance in a Furbulent World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 109.
    T. Weiss (2005) ‘Governance, Good Governance and Global Governance: Conceptual and Actual Challenges’ in R. Wilkinson (ed.) The Global Governance Reader (London: Routledge), p. 70.Google Scholar
  119. 110.
    E. Kirchner and J. Sperling (2007) EU Security… Google Scholar
  120. 111.
    J. Sperling (2009) ‘Security Governance in a Westphalian World’ in C. Wagnsson, J. Sperling and J. Hallenberg (eds) European Security Governance. The European Union in a Westphalian World (New York: Routledge), pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
  121. 113.
    E. Kirchner and J. Sperling (2007) EU Security…, p. 7.Google Scholar
  122. 115.
    T. Akaha (2002) Non Traditional Security Issues…Google Scholar
  123. 117.
    T. Dunne and N. Wheeler (2004) ‘“We the People…Google Scholar
  124. See also M. Davies (2014) ‘An agreement to disagree: The ASEAN Human Rights Declaration and the absence of regional identity in Southeast Asia,’ Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 33 (3), 107–29.Google Scholar
  125. 118.
    R. Emmers (2006) ‘International Regime Building in Southeast Asia: ASEAN Cooperation against the Illicit Trafficking and Abuse of Drugs,’ WP Series n. 106 (Singapore: Institute of Defense and Strategic Studies).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Angela Pennisi di Floristella 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angela Pennisi di Floristella
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CataniaItaly

Personalised recommendations