Abstract
As demonstrated in Chapter 1, a refugee is defined by the 1951 Refugee Convention as someone who:
owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality, and is unable to, or owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country.
This is different from an asylum-seeker: ‘in the UK an asylum-seeker is someone who has asked the Government for refugee status and is waiting to hear the outcome of their application’ (United Nations High Commission for Refugees, 2014). An immigrant is someone who leaves her/his country of birth and moves to another. This means that all refugees and asylum-seekers are immigrants, but not all immigrants are refugees or asylum-seekers. However, ‘immigrant’, ‘refugee’ and ‘asylum-seeker’ will be shown not to be the only terms used in the asylum debate, nor are these official definitions the only way that these terms are used; instead, it will be shown that contributors to the asylum debate argue over these terms in ways that either support or challenge the ways in which asylum-seekers in the UK are treated. The most prominent of these is that of the ‘bogus’ asylum-seeker, who is presented as not really an asylum-seeker at all, but someone interested only in money. In response to this, it can be seen how asylum-seekers, and their supporters, work to focus instead on the reason people have for seeking asylum: safety.
you really start feeling bogus (after a while), you think maybe I’ve come here for the benefits, maybe.hh::: you know you start believing it.
(Leudar, Hayes, Nekvapil & Baker, 2008, p. 212)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Further reading
Tileaga, C. (2007). Ideologies of moral exclusion: A critical discursive reframing of depersonalization, delegitimization and dehumanization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 717–737.
Leudar, I., Marsland, V. & Nekvapil, J. (2004). On membership categorization: ‘Us’, ‘them’ and ‘doing violence’ in political discourse. Discourse and Society, 15, 243–266.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Steve Kirkwood, Simon Goodman, Chris McVittie and Andy McKinlay
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kirkwood, S., Goodman, S., McVittie, C., McKinlay, A. (2016). Who Counts as an Asylum-Seeker or Refugee?. In: The Language of Asylum. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-46116-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-46116-2_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57613-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-46116-2
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)