Skip to main content

Who Counts as an Asylum-Seeker or Refugee?

  • Chapter
The Language of Asylum
  • 1345 Accesses

Abstract

As demonstrated in Chapter 1, a refugee is defined by the 1951 Refugee Convention as someone who:

owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality, and is unable to, or owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country.

This is different from an asylum-seeker: ‘in the UK an asylum-seeker is someone who has asked the Government for refugee status and is waiting to hear the outcome of their application’ (United Nations High Commission for Refugees, 2014). An immigrant is someone who leaves her/his country of birth and moves to another. This means that all refugees and asylum-seekers are immigrants, but not all immigrants are refugees or asylum-seekers. However, ‘immigrant’, ‘refugee’ and ‘asylum-seeker’ will be shown not to be the only terms used in the asylum debate, nor are these official definitions the only way that these terms are used; instead, it will be shown that contributors to the asylum debate argue over these terms in ways that either support or challenge the ways in which asylum-seekers in the UK are treated. The most prominent of these is that of the ‘bogus’ asylum-seeker, who is presented as not really an asylum-seeker at all, but someone interested only in money. In response to this, it can be seen how asylum-seekers, and their supporters, work to focus instead on the reason people have for seeking asylum: safety.

you really start feeling bogus (after a while), you think maybe I’ve come here for the benefits, maybe.hh::: you know you start believing it.

(Leudar, Hayes, Nekvapil & Baker, 2008, p. 212)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further reading

  • Tileaga, C. (2007). Ideologies of moral exclusion: A critical discursive reframing of depersonalization, delegitimization and dehumanization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 717–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leudar, I., Marsland, V. & Nekvapil, J. (2004). On membership categorization: ‘Us’, ‘them’ and ‘doing violence’ in political discourse. Discourse and Society, 15, 243–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 Steve Kirkwood, Simon Goodman, Chris McVittie and Andy McKinlay

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kirkwood, S., Goodman, S., McVittie, C., McKinlay, A. (2016). Who Counts as an Asylum-Seeker or Refugee?. In: The Language of Asylum. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-46116-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics