Skip to main content

Abstract

Since the days of Talcott Parsons (1973), Joseph Ben-David (1977) and Burton Clark (1983), higher education research has been deeply rooted in the analysis of individual national higher education systems and in their comparison. For a long time this has been an appropriate and fruitful approach, since in many countries of the world higher education has predominantly been organized as a service of the public sector, and universities and other higher education institutions have been mainly regarded as national institutions. But this approach becomes inadequate in our days. This is one of the arguments which will be made in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baecker, D. (2010) ‘A systems primer on universities’, Soziale Systeme: Zeitschrift für soziologische Theorie, 16(2), 356–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. P. (2014). The Schooled Society. The Educational Transformation of Global Culture (Stanford: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-David, J. (1977) Centers of Learning. Britain, France, Germany, United States (New York: Mc Graw Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Biffl, G. and T. Pfeffer (2013) Recognition of qualifications of citizens of another EU Member State. Background paper for the Europe on the move conference — Participation and Integration of EU-citizens, Vienna: Bundesministerium für Inneres (bm.i).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brint, S. (2002). ‘The rise of the “practical arts” ’, in S. Brint (ed) The Future of the City of Intellect: The Changing American University (pp. 231–259) (Stanford: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1983) The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective (Berkeley: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J. and W. W. Powell (1983) ‘The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields’, American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karabel, J. (2006) The Chosen. The Hidden History of Admission and Exclusion at Harvard, Yale and Princeton (Boston, NY: Mariner Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasparovsky, H. (2003) Lissabon-Empfehlung allgemein 2004. Übereinkommen über die Anerkennung von Qualifikationen im Hochschulbereich in der europäischen Region. Erläuternde Bemerkungen und Empfehlungen zur Durchführung (Vienna: bm:bwk).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keevy, J., Chakroun, B. and A. Deij (2010) Transnational Qualifications Frameworks (Report commissioned by the European Training Foundation) (Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krücken, G. and F. Meier (2006) ‘Turning the university into an organizational actor’, in G. S. Drori, J. W. Meyer and K. Hwang (eds) Globalization and Organization. World Society and Organizational Change (pp. 241–257) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1975) ‘Interaktion, Organisation, Gesellschaft. Anwendungen der Systemtheorie’, in Soziologische Aufklärung 2. Aufsätze zur Theorie der Gesellschaft (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1984) Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1997) Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft (Bde. 1–2) (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (2002). ‘I see something you don’t see’, in W. Rasch (ed) Theories of Distinction. Redescribing the Description of Modernity (pp. 187–193) (Stanford: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (2005) ‘The autopoiesis of social systems’, in D. Seidl and K. H. Becker (eds) Niklas Luhmann and Organization Studies (S. 64–70) (Malmö: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins, H. (1974) ‘Time and theory in sociology’, in J. Rex (ed) Approaches to Sociology (S. 246–294) (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M. and F. O. Ramirez (1997) ‘World society and the nation state’, American Journal of Sociology, 103, 144–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nentwich, M. (2001) ‘(Re-)De-commodification in academic knowledge distribution?’ Science Studies, 14(2), 21–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. and G. M. Platt (1973) The American University, 2nd Print edn (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, T. and I. Skrivanek (2013) ‘Institutionelle Verfahren zur Anerkennung ausländischer Qualifikationen und zur Validierung nicht formal oder informell erworbener Kompetenzen in Österreich // Institutionalized procedures for the recognition of foreign qualifications and for the validation of non-formal or informal competencies in Austria’, Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung, 3(1), doi: 10.1007/s35834–013-0058–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. (1997) The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Riddle, P. (1989) University and the State: Political Competition and the Rise of the Universities 1200–1985, (Stanford: Stanford University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofer, E. and J. W. Meyer (2005) ‘The worldwide expansion of higher education in the twentieth century’, American Sociological Review, 70, 898–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidl, D. (2005). ‘The basic concepts of Luhmann’s theory of social systems’, in D. Seidl and K. H. Becker (eds) Niklas Luhmann and Organization Studies (Malmö: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidl, D. and K. H. Becker (2005) ‘Introduction: Luhmann’s organization theory’, in D. Seidl and K. H. Becker (eds) Niklas Luhmann and Organization Studies (pp. S8–18) (Malmö: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanghai Ranking Consultancy (2014) ‘About Academic Ranking of World Universities’, http://www.shanghairanking.com/aboutarwu.html (retrieved 4 June 2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, F. B. (2009) ‘Wurzeln der systemtheoretischen Organisationstheorie’, in R. Wimmer, J. O. Meissner and P. Wolf (eds) Praktische Organisationswissenschaft. Lehrbuch für Studium und Beruf (Heidelberg: Carl-Auer-Systeme).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer Brown, G. (1971) Laws of Form (London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stichweh, R. (1991) Der frühmoderne Staat und die europäische Universität. Zur Interaktion von Politik und Erziehungssystem im Prozess ihrer Ausdifferenzierung (16–18 Jahrhundert) (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stichweh, R. (2006) ‘Die Universität in der Wissensgesellschaft: Wissensbegriffe und Umweltbeziehungen der modernen Universität’, Soziale Systeme, 12, 33–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stichweh, R. (2007) ‘The eigenstructures of world society and the regional cultures of the world’, in I. Rossi (ed) Frontiers of Globalization Research. Theoretical and Methodological Approaches (pp. 133–150) (New York: Springer).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stichweh, R. (2009) Center and Periphery in a Global University System (Luzern: University of Lucerne).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stichweh, R. (2010a) ‘Funktionale Differenzierung der Weltgesellschaft’, in G. Albert and S. Sigmund (eds) Soziologische Theorie kontrovers. Sonderheft 50/2010 der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 50, pp. 299–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stichweh, R. (2010b) Die Universität in der Weltgesellschaft (Luzerner Universitätsreden Nr. 19).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stichweh, R. (2011) ‘Niklas Luhmann’, in G. Ritzer and J. Stepnisky (eds) Major Social Theorists. Vol. II. Contemporary Social Theorists (pp. 287–309) (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stichweh, R. (2013) ‘The history and systematics of functional differentiation in sociology’, in M. Albert, B. Buzan and M. Zürn (eds) Bringing Sociology to International Relations. World Politics as Differentiation Theory (pp. 50–70) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stichweh, R. (2015) ‘Comparing systems theory and sociological neo-institutionalism: explaining functional differentiation’, in B. Holzer, F. Kastner and T. Werron (eds) From Globalization to World Society. Neo-Institutional and Systems-Theoretical Perspectives (pp. 23–36) (New York and London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, Th. B. (1918) The Higher Learning in America. A Memorandum on the Conduct of Universities by Business Men. (New York: Augustus M. Kelley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1979) Der Prozess des Organisierens (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Thomas Pfeffer and Rudolf Stichweh

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pfeffer, T., Stichweh, R. (2015). Systems Theoretical Perspectives on Higher Education Policy and Governance. In: Huisman, J., de Boer, H., Dill, D.D., Souto-Otero, M. (eds) The Palgrave International Handbook of Higher Education Policy and Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-45617-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics