Skip to main content

Institutionalism and Organizational Change

  • Chapter

Abstract

Institutional theory usually refers to a broad group of perspectives that interpret the relationship between institutions and human behaviour, assuming that not only human actions (i.e. behaviour, perceptions, power, policy preferences, decision-making processes) shape institutions, but these are also influenced by them. More specifically, institutionalism focuses on the need of organizations to adapt to their institutional environment, such as norms, rules and understandings about what is an acceptable or normal behaviour and that cannot be changed easily and/or instantaneously (March and Olsen, 1984; Meyer and Rowan, 1977). It argues that organizations take rules and norms for granted because they seem obvious or natural. Failure to act in accordance with norms and expectations may lead to conflict and illegitimacy. Changes occurring at the institutional field of higher education (HE) are said to increasingly constrain higher education institutions (HEIs). Given this, it is increasingly relevant to analyse the development of institutionalist theories and the way they have been adapted to the HE field.

Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amaral, A., Jones, G. and B. Karseth (eds) (2002) Governing Higher Education: National Perspectives on Institutional Governance (Dordrecht: Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, A. and A. Magalhães (2003) ‘The triple crisis of the university and its reinvention’, Higher Education Policy, 16(2), 239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspinwall, M. D. and G. Schneider (2000) ‘Same menu, separate tables: the institutionalist turn in political science and the study of European integration’, European Journal of Political Research, 38(1), 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. (2002) ‘Institutionalism’, in J. Summers (ed) Government, Politics, Power and Policy in Australia (pp. 363–380) (Melbourne: Pearson Education Australia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bess, J. and J. Dee (2008) ‘The application of organizational theory to colleges and universities’, in Understanding College and University Organization: Theories of Effective Policy and Practice VI (pp. 1–17) (Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevir, M. (2009) Key Concepts in Governance (Los Angeles: SAGE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I. and M. Kogan (2007) ‘Organization and governance of universities’, Higher Education Policy, 20, 477–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckmann, S. and T. Carvalho (2014) ‘The reform process of Portuguese higher education institutions: from collegial to managerial governance’, Tertiary Education and Management, 30(3), 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, T. and R. Santiago (2010a) ‘Still academics after all’, Higher Education Policy, 23, 397–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, T. and R. Santiago (2010b) ‘New public management and “middle management”: how do deans influence institutional policies?’, in L. Meek, L. Goedegebuure, R. Santiago and T. Carvalho (eds) The Changing Dynamics of Higher Education Middle Management (pp. 165–196) (Dordrecht: Springer).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, T. (2014) ‘Changing connections between professionalism and managerialism: a case study of nursing in Portugal’, Professions and Organization, 1(2), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaui, M. (1999) ‘A universidade em ruínas’, in H. Trindade (ed) Universidade em ruiìnas na repuìblica dos professors (pp. 211–222) (Petrópolis: Editora Vozes).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. (ed) (1970) The Distinctive College (Chicago: Aldine).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. (1972) ‘The organizational saga in higher education’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 178–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. (ed) (1998) Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation (New York: International Association of Universities Press/Pergamon: Elsevier Science).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. (2004) ‘Delineating the character of the entrepreneurial university’, Higher Education Policy, 17(4), 355–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M., March, J. and J. Olsen (1972) ‘A garbage can model of organizational choice’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. and J. March (1974) Leadership and Ambiguity: The American College President (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. and W. Powell (1983) (eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Diogo, S. (2014a) ‘Implementing the Bologna Process in Portugal and in Finland: national and institutional realities in perspective’, Journal of the European Higher Education Area, 1(1), 35–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferlie, E., Musselin, C. and G. Andresani (2008) ‘The steering of higher education systems: a public management perspective’, Higher Education, 56(3), 325–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N. (2008) ‘Fields, Power and Social Skill: A Critical Analysis of the New Institutionalisms’, Center for Culture, Organizations and Politics. UC Berkeley: Center for Culture, Organizations and Politics. Retrieved from: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/89m770dv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fumasoli, T. and B. Stensaker (2013) ‘Organizational studies in higher education: a reflection on historical themes and prospective trends’, Higher Education Policy, 26, 479–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, Å. (1999) ‘Governmental policies and organisational change’, Higher Education, 38(1), 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R. and C. Hinings (1993) ‘Understanding strategic change: the contribution of archetypes’, The Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), 1052–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. and R. Suddaby (eds) (2008) ‘Introduction’, The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 1–46) (London: SAGE Publications Ltd).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. and R. Taylor (1996) ‘Political science and the three new institutionalisms’, Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, T. and J. Freeman (1977) ‘The population ecology of organizations’, The American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. (2008) ‘The emergence of the idea of institutions as repositories of knowledge’, in A. Ebner and N. Beck (eds) The Institutions of the Market: Organizations, Social Systems, and Governance (pp. 23–40) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, G. (2006) ‘Institutions of academic governance and institutional theory: a framework for further research’, in J. C. Smart (ed) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Volume XXI (pp. 213–281) (Dordrecht: Springer).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koelble, T. (1995) ‘The new institutionalism in political science and sociology’, Comparative Politics, 27(2), 231–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, M. and M. Ventresca (2003) ‘The new structuralism in organizational theory’, Organization, 10(3), 457–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J. and K. Thelen (eds) (2010) Explaining Institutional Change — Ambiguity, Agency, and Power (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. and J. Olsen (eds) (1989) Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics (New York, NY: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. and J. Olsen (1984) ‘The new institutionalism: organizational factors in political life’, The American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. and J. Olsen (2005) ‘Elaborating the new institutionalism’, Working Paper, 11, http://www.arena.uio.no retrieved November 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. and B. Rowan (1977) ‘Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. and B. Rowan (1985) ‘The structure of educational organizations’, in J. Meyer, and R. Scott (eds) Organizational Environments: Rituals and Rationality (pp. 71–97) (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. and R. Scott (1983) Organizational Environments (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J., Ramirez, F., Frank, D. and E. Schofer (2008) ‘Higher education as an institution’, in P. Gumport (ed) Sociology of Higher Education: Contributions and Their Contexts (pp. 187–221) (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, A., Martens, K. and M. Windzio (2010) ‘Introduction — education policy in transformation’, in K. Martens, K. Nagel, M. Windzio and A. Weymann (eds) Transformation of Education Policy (pp. 3–27) (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (ed) (2012) The Evaluative State, Institutional Autonomy and Re-engineering Higher Education in Western Europe. The Prince and His Pleasure (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nóvoa, A. and T. Yariv-Mashal (2003) ‘Comparative research in education: a mode of governance or a historical journey?’, Comparative Education, 39(4), 423–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ordorika, I. (2014) ‘Governance and change in higher education: the debate between classical political sociology, new institutionalism and critical theories’, Bordon, 66(1), 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souto-Otero, M., Fleckenstein, T. and R. Dacombe (2008) ‘Filling in the gaps: European governance, the open method of coordination and the European commission’, Journal of Education Policy, 23(3), 231–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietilä, M. (2014) ‘The many faces of research profiling: academic leaders’ conceptions of research steering’, Higher Education, 67, 303–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1956) ‘Suggestions for a sociological approach to the theory of organizations’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1, 63–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. and G. Salancik (eds) (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (New York: Harper & Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, M. (2009) ‘The new institutionalisms and European integration’, in A. Wiener and T. Diez (eds) European Integration Theory (pp. 125–144) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. (2007) ‘The new institutionalism’, The International Encyclopedia of Organization Studies (Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, F. (2012) ‘The world society perspective: concepts, assumptions and strategies’, Comparative Education, 48(4), 423–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, R. (2001) Institutions and Organizations (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. (1948) ‘Foundations of the theory of organizations’, American Sociological Review, 13(1), 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. (1957) Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation (Berkeley: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, R. A. (1947) Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization (New York: The Macmillan Co).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoenig, J. C. (2012) ‘Institutional theories and public institutions: traditions and appropriateness’, in G. Peters and J. Pierre (eds) Handbook of Public Administration (pp. 127–138) (Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Knowledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P. and W. Ocasio (2008) ‘Institutional logics’, in R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin and R. Suddaby (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 99–129) (Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, P. and L. Zucker (1996) ‘The institutionalization of institutional theory’, in S. Clegg, C. Hardy and W. Nord (eds) Handbook of Organization Studies (pp. 175–190) (London: SAGE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Veiga, A. (2010) Bologna and the Institutionalisation of the European Higher Education Area, Doctoral Dissertation (Porto: University of Porto).

    Google Scholar 

  • Veiga, A. and A. Amaral (2012) ‘Soft law and implementation problems of the Bologna process’, Educação, Sociedade e Culturas, 36, 121–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Välimaa, J. (2005) ‘Social dynamics of higher education reforms: the case of Finland’, in Å. Gornitzka, M. Kogan and A. Amaral (eds) Reform and Change in Higher Education. Analysing Policy Implementation (pp. 245–269) (Dordrecht: Springer).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. (1976) ‘Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. and J. Gläser (eds) (2014) Organizational Transformation and Scientific Change: The Impact of Institutional Restructuring on Universities and Intellectual Innovation (Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1981) ‘The economics of organization: the transaction cost approach’, American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witte, J. (2006) Change of Degrees and Degrees of Change: Comparing Adaptations of European Higher Education Systems in the Context of the Bologna Process, Doctoral Dissertation (Twente: Center for Higher Education Policy Studies, University of Twente).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. (1977) ‘The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence’, American Sociological Review, 42, 726–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Sara Diogo, Teresa Carvalho and Alberto Amaral

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Diogo, S., Carvalho, T., Amaral, A. (2015). Institutionalism and Organizational Change. In: Huisman, J., de Boer, H., Dill, D.D., Souto-Otero, M. (eds) The Palgrave International Handbook of Higher Education Policy and Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-45617-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics