Skip to main content

The Difference Diversity Makes: A Principle, a Lens, an Empirical Attribute for Majority-Minority Relations

  • Chapter
Governing through Diversity

Part of the book series: Global Diversities ((GLODIV))

Abstract

This chapter explores the contribution of diversity, as a concept and a research optic, to the debate on immigrant incorporation and majority-minority relations in Europe. While the use of this term abounds in the recent literature, its meaning often sounds unduly self-evident, as if it were a principle in its own right. There is still little reflection on the variety of stances and interests which underlie it at a number of levels: as an approach to interethnic relations, an empirical attribute, a (potential) new mode of immigrant incorporation or even a more fashionable synonym for multiculturalism, apparently less burdened with ideological and normative implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2007). The language of diversity. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(2), 235–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alba, R., & Nee, V. (2003). Remaking the American Mainstream. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anthyas, F. (2013). Moving beyond the Janus face of integration and diversity discourses. The Sociological Review, 61(2), 323–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauböck, R. (2008). Beyond culturalism and statism: Liberal responses to diversity, Eurosphere Working Paper Series. Retrieved from: http://eurospheres.org/files/2010/08/plugin-Eurosphere_Working_Paper_6_Baubock.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J., & Hartmann, D. (2007). Diversity in everyday discourse: The cultural ambiguities and consequences of “happy talk”. American Sociological Review, 72(6), 895–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, M., & Sigona, N. (2013). Ethnography, diversity and urban space. Identities, 20(4), 347–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boccagni, P. (2012). Rethinking transnational studies. European Journal of Social Theory, 15(1), 117–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boccagni, P. (2015). (Super)diversity and the migration-social work nexus: A new lens on the field of access and inclusion? Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38(4), 608–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, R. (2001). The return of assimilation? Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24(4), 531–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau, R., Yu, S., & Tran, C. (2011). The diversity based approach to culturally sensitive practices. International Social Work, 54(1), 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, G. (2007). Keyword: Cultural diversity — A guide through the debate. Zeitschrift fur Erziehungswissenschaft, 10(1), 7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiTomaso, N., Post, C., & Parks-Yancy, R. (2007). Workforce diversity and inequality. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 473–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entzinger, H. (2005). Multiculturalism revisited. In E. Ben Rafael, & Y. Sternberg (Eds.), Comparing Modernities (pp. 191–204). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdal, M., & Oeppen, C. (2013). Migrant balancing acts: Understanding the interaction between integration and transnationalism. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(6), 867–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faist, T. (2009). Diversity: A new mode of incorporation? Ethnic and Racial Studies, 32(1), 171–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fanshawe, F., & Sriskandarajah, D. (2010). “You Can’t Put Me in a Box”. Super-Diversity and the End of Identity Politics in Britain. London: IPPR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D., & Klein, K. (2007). What’s the difference? Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herring, C., & Henderson, L. (2011). From affirmative action to diversity: Toward a critical diversity perspective. Critical Sociology, 38(5), 629–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, M., Reeskens, T., Stolle, D., & Trappers, A. (2009). Ethnic diversity and generalized trust in Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 42(2), 198–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen, K., Maznevski. M., & Schneider, S. (2011). Diversity and its not so diverse literature. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 11(1), 35–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joppke, C. (2004). The retreat of multiculturalism in the liberal state. British Journal of Sociology, 55(2), 237–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kesler, C., & Bloemraad, I. (2010). Does immigration erode social capital? Canadian Journal of Political Science, 43(2), 319–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivisto, P. (2012). We really are all multiculturalists now. The Sociological Quarterly, 53(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knotter, S., De Lobel, R., Tsipouri, L., & Stenius, V. (Eds.) (2011). Diversity Research and Policy. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, R. (2013). Multiculturalism and immigration. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 147–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, P. (2012). The politics of complex diversity: A European perspective. Ethnicities, 12(1), 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (2012). Multiculturalism. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute. Retrieved from: http://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/TCM-multiculturalism-success-failure.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lentin, A., & Titley, G. (2008). More Benetton than barricades? The politics of diversity in Europe. In A. Lentin, & G. Titley (Eds.), The Politics of Diversity in Europe (pp. 9–30). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, P., & Glick-Schiller, N. (2004). Conceptualizing simultaneity. International Migration Review, 37(3), 1002–1039.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, P., Jaworsky, N. (2007). Transnational migration studies. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 129–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moses, M., & Chang, M. (2006). Toward a deeper understanding of the diversity rationale. Educational Researcher, 35(1), 6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olwig, K.F. (2013). Notions and practices of difference: An epilogue on the ethnography of diversity. Identities, 20(4), 471–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. (2009). Migration and development: Reconciling opposite views. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 32(1), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A., & Vickstrom, E. (2011). Diversity, social capital, and cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 461–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitz, J., Breton, R., Dion, K.K., & Dion, K.L. (2009). Multiculturalism and Social Cohesion. New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Qin, J., Muenjohn, N., & Cheatri, P. (2013). A review of diversity conceptualizations. Human Resource Development Review, 20(10), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolle, D., Soroka, S., & Johnston, R. (2008). When does diversity erode trust? Political Studies, 56(1), 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Ewijk, A. (2011). Diversity and diversity policy. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(5), 680–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, S. (2009). Conceiving and Researching Diversity. MMG (Working Paper 09/01). Retrieved from: http://www.mmg.mpg.de/fileadmin/user_upload/documents/wp/WP_09-01_Vertovec_Diversity.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, S. (2012). “Diversity” and the social imaginary. European Journal of Sociology, 53(3), 287–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, S., & Wessendorf, S. (Eds.) (2010). The Multiculturalism Backlash. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessendorf, S. (2009). Commonplace Diversity and the “Ethos” of Mixing. MMG (Working Paper 11/09). Retrieved from: http://www.mmg.mpg.de/publications/working-papers/2011/wp-11-09/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, A., & Glick-Schiller, N. (2003). Methodological nationalism, the social sciences and the study of migration. International Migration Review, 37(3), 576–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise, A., & Velayutham, S. (Eds.) (2009). Everyday Multiculturalism, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, P. (2003). Diversity. San Francisco: Encounter Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrench, J. (2007). Diversity Management and Discrimination. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Paolo Boccagni

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boccagni, P. (2015). The Difference Diversity Makes: A Principle, a Lens, an Empirical Attribute for Majority-Minority Relations. In: Matejskova, T., Antonsich, M. (eds) Governing through Diversity. Global Diversities. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-43825-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics