Advertisement

Human Development and Minority Empowerment: Exploring Regional Perspectives on Peace in South Asia

  • Florian Krampe
  • Ashok Swain

Abstract

South Asia is the sub-Himalayan southern region of the Asian continent, comprising eight countries: Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Maldives, Nepal, India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. South Asia has a population of about 1.6 billion, which is characterized by significant cultural divergences between and within the states. An estimated 2,000 ethnic groups, at least six ethnic-linguistic families and several major faiths make South Asia one of the most diverse regions on earth. The states and societies in this vast region face challenges on several fronts. The major challenge is to achieve the social and political stability that is needed to enable their progress towards increased human development. Several factors, however, make the prospects of progress daunting. The rise in the region’s population is a key challenge. A large part of the population in South Asia lives in abject poverty.

Keywords

Human Development Index Transitional Justice Regional Perspective Human Development Report Congress Party 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    UNDP, Human Development Report 2013: The Rise of the South: Human Progress in a Diverse World. New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2013, http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/14/hdr2013_en_complete.pdf, accessed 21 June 2014.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. V. Paul, The Warrior State: Pakistan in the Contemporary World.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johan Galtung, ‘Violence, Peace, and Peace Research’, Journal of Peace Research 6, no. 3 (1969): 167–191; John Paul Lederach, Building Peace — Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies (Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Research, 1997).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    UNDP, Human Development Report 2013.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Patrick Heller, ‘Social Capital as a Product of Class Mobilization and State Intervention: Industrial Workers in Kerala, India’, World Development 24, no. 6 (1996): 1055–1067; Ashok Swain, Struggle against the State (Surrey: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2013).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Interviews conducted in Nepal in September 2013 by Florian Krampe.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Ramachandra Guha, ‘Adivasis, Naxalites and Indian Democracy’, Economic and Political Weekly no. 11 (2007): 3305–3312.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Swain, Struggle against the State.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    India’s Naxalites: A spectre haunting India. (2006, August 12). India’s Naxalites: A spectre haunting India, http://www.economist.com/node/7799247, accessed 19 June 2014.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    John Whelpton, A History of Nepal (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Richmond describes this as a post-liberal peace. Oliver Richmond, A Post-Liberal Peace (London and New York: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arend Lijphart, ‘The Puzzle of Indian Democracy: A Consociational Interpretation’, The American Political Science Review 90, no. 2 (1 June 1996): 258–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    For an explicit and complete rejection of the consociational theory with regard to India, see Paul R. Brass, The Politics of India since Independence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), 342–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kanti Bajpai, ‘Diversity, Democracy and Devolution in India’, in Government Policies and Ethnic Relations in Asia and the Pacific, eds Michael Edward Brown and Sumit Ganguly (Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1997), 33–83.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Richard Sisson and Leo E. Rose, War and Secession: Pakistan, India, and the Creation of Bangladesh (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1990).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jonathan Spencer, Anthropology, Politics, and the State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ramachandra Guha, India after Gandhi: The History of the World’s Largest Democracy (New York: Ecco, 2007), 4.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Swain, Struggle against the State; Guha, India after Gandhi: The History of the World’s Largest Democracy.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    David Chandler, International Statebuilding: The Rise of Post-Liberal Governance (Abingdon: Routledge, 2010); Mark Duffield, Development, Security and Unending War: Governing the World of Peoples (Cambridge: Polity, 2007); Florian Krampe, ‘The Liberal Trap — Peacemaking and Peacebuilding in Afghanistan after 9/11’, in Mediation and Liberal Peacebuilding. Peace from the Ashes of War? eds Mikael Eriksson and Roland Kostić (London: Routledge, 2013), 57–75; Eriksson and Kostić, Mediation and Liberal Peacebuilding.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Krampe, ‘The Liberal Trap — Peacemaking and Peacebuilding in Afghanistan after 9/11’, 72.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ibid., 73.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lok Raj Baral, Nepal — Nation-State in the Wilderness (New Delhi: Sage Publications Pvt. Limited, 2012).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    UN Security Council, Resolution 1740 (2007), 2007.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tobias Denskus, ‘The Fragility of Peacebuilding in Nepal’, Peace Review 21, no. 1 (2009), 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dev Raj Dahal and C. D. Bhatta, eds, Building Bridges of Peace in Nepal (Kathmandu: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES), 2010).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Florian Krampe, Empowering Peace: Service Provision and State legitimacy in Peacebuilding in Nepal. Conflict, Security, and Development 16, no 1 (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2016.1136138.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Denskus, ‘The Fragility of Peacebuilding in Nepal’, 54.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Baral, Nepal — Nation-State in the Wilderness, 70.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Krampe, ‘Empowering Peace: Service Provision and State legitimacy in Peacebuilding in Nepal’.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    See Richmond, A Post-Liberal Peace.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    James C. Hathaway, The Rights of Refugees under International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Florian Krampe and Ashok Swain 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Florian Krampe
  • Ashok Swain

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations