Advertisement

The Birth of Militarism in the Age of Democratic Revolutions

  • David A. Bell
Part of the War, Culture and Society, 1750–1850 book series (WCS)

Abstract

In the year 1813, as Napoleon Bonaparte’s empire was crumbling, Benjamin Constant issued one of the earliest and most powerful condemnations of what we now call militarism. It was highly dangerous, he warned, ‘to create in a country … a large mass of men imbued with an exclusively military spirit’. Would these men, at the end of a war, shed their attitudes along with their uniforms? To the contrary, ‘those without weapons strike them as an ignoble mob, laws as useless subtleties … opposition as disorder and reasoning as revolt’. Constant insisted that in a modern world of constitutional regimes and commerce, a military ‘spirit of conquest’was a menacing vestige of an earlier age.1

Keywords

Military Service Military Coup Moral Superiority Civilian Control Democratic Revolution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Émile Durkheim, Suicide, Study in Sociology (New York, 1951), 238.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Hans Joas, War and Modernity (Cambridge, 2003);Google Scholar
  3. and Hans Joas and Wolfgang Knöbl, War in Social Thought: Hobbes to the Present (Princeton, NJ, 2013).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    See Volker R. Berghahn, Militarism: The History of an International Debate, 1861–1979 (New York, 1982);Google Scholar
  5. Alfred Vagts, A History of Militarism (Westport, CT, 1981);Google Scholar
  6. and Hans Rosenberg, Bureaucracy, Aristocracy, and Autocracy; the Prussian Experience, 1660–1815 (Cambridge, MA, 1958).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Timothy Tackett, Becoming a Revolutionary: The Deputies of the French National Assembly and the Emergence of a Revolutionary Culture (1789–1790) (Princeton, NJ, 1996), 32–34.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    On the three orders see the classic work of Georges Duby, Les trois ordres, ou l’imaginaire du féodalisme (Paris, 1978).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    On classical republicanism, see above all J. G. A. Pocock, The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition (Princeton, NJ, 1975).Google Scholar
  10. 12.
    See the discussion in David A. Bell, The First Total War: Napoleon’s Europe and the Birth of Warfare as We Know it (Boston, 2007), 21–37.Google Scholar
  11. 13.
    See Mark Kishlansky, The Rise of the New Model Army (Cambridge, 1979).Google Scholar
  12. 16.
    Peter Wilson, ‘Social Militarization in Eighteenth-Century Germany’, German History 18/1 (2000): 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 17.
    See Marc Raeff, The Well-Ordered Police State: Social and Institutional Change Through Law in the Germanies and Russia, 1600–1800 (New Haven, CT, 1983).Google Scholar
  14. 18.
    On the ‘military revolution’, see the essays in Clifford J. Rogers, ed., The Military Revolution Debate: Readings on the Military Transformation of Early Modern Europe (Boulder, CO, 1995).Google Scholar
  15. 19.
    John Trenchard, An Argument Shewing: That a Standing Army is Inconsistent with a Free Government, ed. Walter Moyle (Exeter, 1971); and Pocock, The Machiavellian Moment, 401–422.Google Scholar
  16. 25.
    See Caroline Cox, A Proper Sense of Honor: Service and Sacrifice in George Washington’s Army (Chapel Hill, NC, 2004).Google Scholar
  17. 29.
    Quoted in Wolfgang Kruse, Die Erfindung des modernen Militarismus: Krieg, Militär und bürgerliche Gesellschaft im politischen Diskurs der Französischen Revolution, 1789–1799 (Munich, 2003), 59.Google Scholar
  18. 30.
    See Rafe Blaufarb, The French Army, 1750–1820: Careers, Talent, Merit (Manchester, 2002), 12–74.Google Scholar
  19. 33.
    See François Furstenberg, In the Name of the Father: Washington’s Legacy, Slavery, and the Making of a Nation (New York, 2006).Google Scholar
  20. 34.
    See Richard H. Kohn, ‘The Inside History of the Newburgh Conspiracy: America and the Coup d’Etat’, William and Mary Quarterly 27/2 (1970): 187–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 35.
    See T. C. W. Blanning, The French Revolutionary Wars, 1787–1802 (London, 1996), 126.Google Scholar
  22. 37.
    Quoted in Wilhelm Janssen, ‘Johann Valentin Embser und der vorrevolutionäre Bellizismus in Deutschland’, in Die Wiedergeburt des Krieges aus dem Geist der Revolution: Studien zum bellizisitischen Diskurs des ausgehenden 18. und beginnenden 19. Jahrhunderts, ed. Johannes Kunisch and Herfried Münkler (Berlin, 1999), 43.Google Scholar
  23. 42.
    Quoted in Philip G. Dwyer, ‘Napoleon Bonaparte as Hero and Saviour: Image, Rhetoric and Behaviour in the Construction of a Legend’, French History 18/4 (2004): 379–404, 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 45.
    Thierry Lentz, Nouvelle histoire du Premier Empire: La France et l’Europe de Napoléon, 1804–1814 (Paris, 2007), 172.Google Scholar
  25. 46.
    Patrice Gueniffey, Bonaparte, 1769–1802 (Paris, 2013), 496.Google Scholar
  26. 49.
    Robert Morrissey, The Economy of Glory: From Ancien Régime France to the Fall of Napoleon (Chicago, 2014).Google Scholar
  27. 50.
    Quoted in Jean Tulard, Napoleon, ou le mythe du sauveur (Paris, 1987), 180.Google Scholar
  28. 51.
    Emmanuel de Las Cases, Mémorial de Sainte Hélène (Paris, 1862), 193Google Scholar
  29. 54.
    See Berghahn, Militarism; Vagts, A History of Militarism; Alain Rouquié, The Military and the State in Latin America (Berkeley, CA, 1987);Google Scholar
  30. and Ute Frevert, A Nation in Barracks: Modern Germany, Military Conscription and Civil Society (Oxford, 2004).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© David A. Bell 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • David A. Bell

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations