Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter summarizes the theory and evidence regarding Mass Privatization programmes in the post-communist environment. It first defines Mass Privatization and compares it to other ways of privatization used during the postcommunist transition. It then summarizes the economic and political arguments for and against this method of privatization. Finally, it discusses the research on the economic and public health consequences of Mass Privatization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, B.A. and B.D. Silver (1989). ‘Patterns of Cohort Mortality in the Soviet Population’. Population and Development Review, 15(3), 471–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.H., Y. Lee, and P. Murrell (2000). ‘Competition and Privatization amidst Weak Institutions: Evidence from Mongolia’. Economic Inquiry, 38(4), 527–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appel, H. (1997). ‘Voucher Privatization in Russia: Structural Consequences and Mass Response in the Second Period of Reform’. Europe-Asia Studies, 49(8), 1433–1449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atun, R.A. (2005). ‘The Health Crisis in Russia: Countries in the Eu and G8 Must Help Russia Tackle Its Health Crisis’. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 331(7530), 1418–1419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J., S. Estrin, J.W. Maw, and G. Urga (2004). ‘Privatization Methods and Economic Growth in Transition Economies’. CEPR Discussion Paper, DP/4291 (London: Centre for Economic Policy Research).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, A., and E. Berg (1997). ‘Methods of Privatization’. Journal of International Affairs, 50(2), 357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O., M. Boycko, M. Dabrowski, R. Dornbusch, R. Layard, and A. Shleifer (1993). Post-Communist Reform: Pain and Progress (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobak, M., M. Murphy, R. Rose, and M. Marmot (2003). ‘Determinants of Adult Mortality in Russia: Estimates from Sibling Data’. Epidemiology, 14(5), 603–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, P. and G. Roland (1992). ‘The Economics of Mass Privatization: Czechoslovakia, East Germany, Hungary and Poland’ in 15th Panel Meeting of Economic Policy (Lisbon: LSE Financial Markets Group), 1–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boycko, M., A. Shleifer, R.W. Vishny, S. Fischer, and J.D. Sachs (1993). ‘Privatizing Russia’. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1993(2), 139–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brada, J.C. (1996). ‘Privatization is Transition--Or is it?’. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(2), 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M., and P. Krotov (1992). ‘The Soviet Transition from Socialism to Capitalism: Worker Control and Economic Bargaining’. American Sociological Review, 57, 16–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L.C., F. Wittgenstein, and E. McKeon (1996). ‘The Upsurge of Mortality in Russia: Causes and Policy Implications’. Population and Development Review, 22(3), 517–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffee, J.C. 1999. ‘Privatization and corporate governance: The lessons from securities market failure’. Journal of Corporation Law, 25, 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coker, R. (2001). ‘Detention and Mandatory Treatment for Tuberculosis Patients in Russia’. The Lancet, 358(9279), 349–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornia, G.A. and R. Paniccia (2004). ‘The Transition Mortality Crisis: Evidence, Interpretation and Policy Responses’ in G.A. Cornia and R. Paniccia (eds) The Mortality Crisis in Transitional Economies (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewatripont, M. and G. Roland (1992). ‘The Virtues of Gradualism and Legitimacy in the Transition to a Market Economy’. Economic Journal, 102(411), 291–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J., Jr. (1979). ‘Changes in Soviet Mortality Patterns, 1959–77’. Population and Development Review, 5(2), 267–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earl, J. and S. Gelsbach (2010). ‘Did Mass Privatization Really Increase Post-Communist Mortality?’ The Lancet, 375(9712), 372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EBRD (1999). Transition Report 1999 (Washington D.C.: EBRD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, M., M. Petticrew, D. Ogilvie, V. Hamilton, and F. Drever (2007). ‘“Profits before People”? A Systematic Review of the Health and Safety Impacts of Privatizing Public Utilities and Industries in Developed Countries’. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61(10), 862–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellerman, D. (2003). ‘On the Russian Privatization Debate’. Challenge, 46(3), 6–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellerman, D. (2001). ‘Lessons from Eastern Europe’s Voucher Privatization’. Challenge, 44(4), 14–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, S., J. Hanousek, E. Kočenda, and J. Svejnar (2009). ‘The Effects of Privatization and Ownership in Transition Economies’. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(3), 699–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, S. and R. Stone (1997). ‘A Taxonomy of Mass Privatization’ in R.M. Desai, I. Lieberman, and S. Nestor (eds) Between State and Market: Mass Privatization in Transition Economies, (Washington D.C.: The World Bank), 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerry, C.J., T.M. Mickiewicz, and Z. Nikoloski (2010). ‘Did Mass Privatization Really Increase Post-Communist Mortality?’ The Lancet, 375(9712), 371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godoy, S. and Stiglitz, J. (2006). ‘Growth, Initial Conditions, Law and Speed of Privatization in Transition Countries: 11 Years Later,’ in S. Estrin, G. W. Kolodko, and M. Uvalic (eds) Transition and Beyond (Hampshire, England: Palgrave Macmillan), 89–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P.A. and D. Soskice (2001). Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hamm, P., L.P. King, and D. Stuckler (2012). ‘Mass Privatization, State Capacity, and Economic Growth in Post-Communist Countries’. American Sociological Review, 77(2), 295–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, L.P. (2003). ‘Shock Privatization: The Effects of Rapid Large Scale Privatization on Enterprise Restructuring’. Politics and Society, 31(1), 3–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, L.P. (2007). ‘Does Neoliberalism Work? Comparing Economic and Sociological Explanations of Postcommunist Performance’. Economic Sociology: The European Electronic Newsletter, 8(2), 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, L.P. and I. Szelényi (2005). ‘Post-Communist Economic Systems’ in N.J. Smelser and R. Swedberg (eds) The Handbook of Economic Sociology, second edition (Princeton: Princeton University Press), 205–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, L.P. and A. Sznajder (2006). ‘The State Led Transition to Liberal Capitalism: Neoliberal, Organizational, World Systems, and Social Structural Explanations of Poland’s Economic Success’. American Journal of Sociology, 12(3), 751–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, L.P. and J. Treskow (2006). ‘Understanding Russian Oil’. Canadian Foreign Policy, 13(2), 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, L., S. David and P. Hamm (2009). ‘Rapid Large-Scale Privatization and Death Rates in Ex-Communist Countries: An Analysis of Stress-Related and Health System Mechanisms’. International Journal of Health Services, 39(3), 461–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. and A. Spicer (2002). ‘Capital Market Development and Mass Privatization are Logical Contradictions: Lessons from Russia and the Czech Republic’. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(1), 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J. (1990). The Road to a Free Economy: Shifting From a Socialist System: the Example of Hungary (New York: Norton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J. (2000). ‘Ten Years after The Road to a Free Economy: The author’s self evaluation’ in B. Pleskovic and N. Stern (eds) Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics (Washington, DC: The World Bank), 49–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowski, J. (1997). ‘The Political Context of Mass Privatization in Poland’ in R.M. Desai, I. Lieberman, and S. Nestor (eds) Between State and Market: Mass Privatization in Transition Economies (Washington D.C.: The World Bank), 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, I.W., A. Ewing, M. Mejstrik, J. Mukherjee, and P. Fidler (1995a). Mass Privatization in Central and Eastem Europe and the Former Soviet Union (Washington D.C.: The World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, I.W., A. Ewing, M. Mejstrik, J. Mukherjee, and P. Fidler (eds) (1995b). Mass Privatization in Central and Eastem Europe and the Former Soviet Union: A Comparative Analysis (Washington D.C.: The World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, D., and J. Sachs (1990). ‘Creating a Market Economy in Eastern Europe: The Case of Poland’. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 75–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marmot, M. (2004). The Status Syndrome: How Social Standing Affects Our Health and Longevity (New York: Owl Book).

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, G.A. (2002). Embedded Politics: Industrial Networks and Institutional Change in Postcommunism (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Megginson, W.L. and J.M. Netter (2001). ‘From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization’. Journal of Economic Literature, 39(2), 321–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Men, T., P. Brennan, and P. Boffetta (2003). ‘Russian Mortality Trends for 1991–2001: Analysis by Cause and Region’. British Medical Journal, 327, 964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murrell, P. (1992). ‘Evolution in Economics and in the Economic Reform of the Centrally Planned Economies’ in C. Clague and G.C. Rausser (eds) The Emergence of Market Economies in Eastern Europe (Cambridge: Blackwell), 35–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okolski, M. (1993). East-West Mortality Differentials: European Population (London: John Libbey).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfitt, T. (2006). ‘Putin Urged to Address “Russia’s Curse”’. The Lancet, 367(9506), 197–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perlman, F. and M. Bobak (2009). ‘Assessing the Contribution of Unstable Employment to Mortality in Posttransition Russia: Prospective Individual-Level Analyses From the Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey’. American Journal of Public Health, 99(10), 1818–1825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popov, V. (2004). ‘The State in the New Russia (1992–2004): From Collapse to Gradual Revival?’ in PONARS Policy Memo 342 (Moscow: New Economic School), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddaway, P., and D. Glinski (2001). The Tragedy of Russia’s Reforms: Market Bolshevism against Democracy (Washington D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roland, G. (1994). ‘On the Speed and Sequencing of Privatization and Restructuring’. Economic Journal, 104(426), 1158–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J.D. (2009). ‘Call for Future Studies is not the Same as Robust Evidence’. Financial Times, date accessed 27 January 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafik, N. (1995). ‘Making a market: Mass privatization in the Czech and Slovak Republics’. World Development, 23(7), 1143–1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A. and R.W. Vishny (1998). The grabbing hand: Government pathologies and their cures (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, R. (1998). ‘New Institutional Economics in the Post-Socialist Transformation Debate’. Journal of Economic Surveys, 12(4), 361–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, F.H. and J.G. Backhaus (2003). ‘Corporate governance and mass privatization: A theoretical investigation of transformations in legal and economic relationships’. Journal of Economic Studies, 30(3/4), 389–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuckler, D., L. King, and M. McKee (2009a). ‘Mass privatization and the post-communist mortality crisis: a cross-national analysis’. The Lancet, 373(9661), 399–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuckler, D., L. King, and M. McKee (2009b). ‘Mass Privatization and Mortality — Authors’ reply’. The Lancet, 373(9671), 1247–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuckler, D., L. King, and M. McKee (2012a). ‘The Disappearing Health Effects of Rapid Privatization: A Sase of Statistical Obscurantism?’ Social Science and Medicine, 75(1), 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuckler, D., L. King, and M. McKee (2012b). ‘Response to Michael Gentile “Mass Privatization, Unemployment and Mortality”’. Europe-Asia Studies, 64(5), 949–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuckler, D., L. King, and M. McKee (2012c). ‘Debate: Response to Michael Gentile “Mass Privatization, Unemployment and Mortality”’. Europe-Asia Studies, 64(5), 949–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. (1990). ‘What Washington Means by Policy Reform’ in J. Williamson (ed) Latin American adjustment: How much has happened? (Washington D.C.: Institute for International Economics), 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Darja Irdam, Gábor Scheiring, and Lawrence King

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Irdam, D., Scheiring, G., King, L. (2015). Mass Privatization. In: Hölscher, J., Tomann, H. (eds) Palgrave Dictionary of Emerging Markets and Transition Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-37138-6_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics