Skip to main content

Common Spoken Languages and International Trade

  • Chapter
The Palgrave Handbook of Economics and Language

Abstract

International trade economists are used to controlling for common languages in most studies on the determinants of bilateral trade. The usual measure of common language is a binary variable based on one or several common official languages. The use of this measure lies mainly in the difficulty of quantifying common language use more thoroughly. However, it is not obvious that a common official language adequately reflects the broader impact of language commonality on trade, including language-related ethnic ties and trust and the mere ability to communicate. For this reason, the impact of a binary common official language variable on bilateral trade might mismeasure the role of common languages on bilateral trade at large. In a recent study, Melitz and Toubal (2014) provide an important step toward the understanding of the impact of common languages on bilateral trade based on data on 42 common native and spoken languages in 195 countries. They find that the joint impact of different aspects of common languages is at least twice as large as the one of a common official language. Their findings, moreover, suggest that common spoken languages are particularly important, and the ease of communication plays a substantial role in explaining the role of common languages for bilateral trade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 264.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • J. Anderson (1979) ‘A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation’, American Economic Review, 69, 106–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Anderson and E. Van Wincoop (2003) ‘Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle’, American Economic Review, 93, 170–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Anderson and E. Van Wincoop (2004) ‘Trade Costs’, Journal of Economic Literature, 42, 691–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Armington (1969) ‘A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production’, IMF Staff Papers, 16, 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Baltagi, P. Egger and M. Pfaffermayr (2003) ‘A Generalized Design for Bilateral Trade Flow Models’, Economics Letters, 80, 391–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Baltagi, P. Egger and M. Pfaffermayr (forthcoming) ‘Panel Data Gravity Models of International Trade’, In B. Baltagi (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Panel Data (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Bergstrand, P. Egger and M. Larch (2013) ‘Gravity Redux: Estimation of Gravity-Equation Coefficients, Elasticities of Substitution, and General Equilibrium Comparative Statics Under Asymmetric Bilateral Trade Costs’, Journal of International Economics, 89, 110–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Eaton and S. Kortum (2002) ‘Technology, Geography, and Trade’, Econometrica, 70, 1741–1779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Egger, M. Larch, K. Staub and R. Winkelmann (2011) ‘The Trade Effects of Endogenous Preferential Trade Agreements’, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 3, 113–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Egger and A. Lassmann (2013) ‘The Causal Impact of Common Native Language On International Trade: Evidence from a Spatial Regression Discontinuity Design’, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 9441.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Egger and S. Nigai (2014) ‘Structural Gravity with Dummies Only’, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 10427.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Egger and K. Staub (2015) ‘GLM Estimation of Trade Gravity Models with Fixed Effects’, Empirical Economics, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Egger and F. Toubal (2014) ‘Consumer Welfare Gains from Speaking Common Languages’, Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Felbermayr, B. Jung and F. Toubal (2011) ‘Ethnic Network, Information and International Trade: Revisiting the Evidence’, Annales d’Économie et de Statistique, 97–98, 41–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Felbermayr and F. Toubal (2010) ‘Cultural Proximity and Trade’, European Economic Review, 54, 279–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • V. Ginsburgh, J. Melitz and F. Toubal (2014) ‘Foreign Language Learning: An Econometric Analysis’, CESifo Working Paper No. 4923.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Guiso, P. Sapienza and L. Zingales (2009) ‘Cultural Biases Affect Economic Exchange’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124, 1095–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Hahn and J. Meinecke (2005) ‘Time Invariant Regressor in Nonlinear Panel Model with Fixed Effects’, Econometric Theory, 21, 455–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Hausman and W. Taylor (1981) ‘Panel Data and Unobservable Individual Effects’, Econometrica, 49, 1377–1398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Head and T. Mayer (2015) ‘Gravity Equations: Workhorse, Toolkit, and Cookbook’, In E. Helpman, K. Rogoff and G. Gopinath (eds) Handbook of International Economics 4 (Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Helpman, M. Melitz and Y. Rubinstein (2008) ‘Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 441–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Mayer and G. Ottaviano (2007) ‘The Happy Few: The Internationalisation of European Firms: New Facts Based on Firm-Level Evidence’, Bruegel Blueprint Series, Vol. III.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Melitz (2008) ‘Language and Foreign Trade’, European Economic Review, 52, 667–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Melitz and F. Toubal (2014) ‘Native Language, Spoken Language, Translation and Trade’, Journal of International Economics, 93, 351–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Rauch (1999) ‘Networks Versus Markets in International Trade’, Journal of International Economics, 48, 7–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Santos Silva and S. Tenreyro (2006) ‘The Log of Gravity’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 88, 641–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Schafer (1997) Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data (London: Chapman & Hall CRC).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • J. Schafer and J. Graham (2002) ‘Missing Data: Our View of the State of the Art’, Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Wooldridge (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Peter H. Egger and Farid Toubal

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Egger, P.H., Toubal, F. (2016). Common Spoken Languages and International Trade. In: Ginsburgh, V., Weber, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Economics and Language. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-32505-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics