This chapter examines the fatherhood settings and fatherhood stories of 14 gay men from the all-Australian sample and eight men from the international sample.1 When these 22 men spoke about relations with their children, they mainly did so by first, explaining the means by which they came to be parents, which I call ‘fatherhood settings’, and second, describing in more detail the nature of relations with their children, which I call ‘fatherhood stories’. My analysis of their stories revealed two fatherhood settings and four main fatherhood stories. The fatherhood settings and fatherhood stories the men told are examined in the context of generation difference, where applicable, and in light of gender assumptions about masculinity and care.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.G. Chauncey (1994) Gay New York: Gender, Urban Culture, and the Making of the Gay Male World, 1890–1940 (New York: Basic Books), pp. 6–7.Google Scholar
- A. McLaren (1999) Twentieth Century Sexuality: A History (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 187ff.Google Scholar
- 5.J. Lindsay and D. Dempsey (2009) Families, Relationships and Intimate Life (Melbourne: Oxford University Press), p. 155.Google Scholar
- 15.N. Elias (2000 ) The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic investigations, trans. E. Jephcott with some notes and corrections by the author. E. Dunning, J. Goudsblom, and S. Mennell (eds), rev. edn (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
- 16.D. Altman (1972) Homosexual: Oppression and Liberation (Sydney: Angus&Robertson).Google Scholar
- 21.G. Chauncey (2004) Why Marriage? The History Shaping Today’s Debate Over Gay Equality (Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books), pp. 110–11;Google Scholar
- M.C. Nussbaum (1999) Sex and Social Justice (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 204–5; Weeks, Heaphy, and Donovan Same Sex Intimacies, pp. 158–9.Google Scholar
- 27.J. Weeks (2000) Making Sexual History (Cambridge: Polity Press), pp. 216–20.Google Scholar
- 29.See, for example, B. Featherstone (2009) Contemporary Fathering: Theory, Policy and Practice (Bristol: Policy Press), pp. 24–5.Google Scholar