Abstract

At least two different narratives have circulated at different times in the West regarding the single life and how it is valued. On the one hand, there is a narrative that depicts the single life as incomplete and single people as invariably lonely. On the other hand, there is another, possibly more powerful narrative, its origins dating from the 1950s and 1960s, in which the single life is represented as exotic, perhaps even threatening because the presence of single people challenges the conventional path from teenage, heterosexual romance(s) to married life with its associated duties and familial responsibilities.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    U. Beck and E. Beck-Gernsheim (1995) The Normal Chaos of Love, trans. M. Ritter and J. Wiebel (Cambridge: Polity Press), p. 145.Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    P. Robinson (2008) The Changing World of Gay Men (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 160–1, 174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 5.
    J. D’Emilio and E.B. Freedman (1997) Intimate Matters: A History of Sexuality in America, 2nd edn (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 302–4.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    D. Altman (1982) The Homosexualization of America, the Americanization of the Homosexual (New York: St Martin’s Press), p. 88.Google Scholar
  5. 10.
    M. Pollak (1986) ‘Male Homosexuality—or Happiness in the Ghetto’ in P. Aries and A. Béjin (eds) Western Sexuality: Practice and Precept in Past and Present Times, trans. A. Forster (Oxford: Basil Blackwell), p. 57.Google Scholar
  6. 11.
    E. White (1980) States of Desire: Travels in Gay America (New York: Dutton), p. 287.Google Scholar
  7. 12.
    A. Giddens (1992) The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies (Cambridge: Polity Press), p. 58.Google Scholar
  8. 14.
    H. Bech (1997) When Men Meet: Homosexuality and Modernity, trans. T. Mequit and T. Davies (Cambridge: Polity Press), p. 97.Google Scholar
  9. 23.
    Mass gay events include circuit parties and leather parties. Cities such as Berlin, Los Angeles, Miami, New York, Rio de Janeiro, and Sydney are known for their mass gay parties. In Melbourne and Sydney in the 1980s, these were often known as ‘warehouse’ parties because they were held in derelict buildings, often warehouses located at shipping docks when freight transport was undergoing the transformation from cargo to container. Mass leather parties in Berlin are still held in derelict power stations, for example. The term ‘circuit’ party is a North American expression. See, for example, C. Carrington (2007) ‘Circuit Culture: Ethnographic Reflections on Inequality, Sexuality, and Life on the Gay Party Circuit’ in N. Teunis and Gilbert Herdt (eds) Sexual Inequalities and Social Justice, with a foreword by R. Parker (Berkeley: University of California Press), pp. 123–47. For more on circuit parties today, see this US-based website, which provides monthly information on mass parties in the Americas and Europe: http://www.justcircuit.com/Home.aspx, accessed 9 October 2012.Google Scholar
  10. 26.
    For more on Greenwich Village as a meeting place for gays and lesbians between the wars, see G. Chauncey (1994) Gay New York: Gender, Urban Culture, and the Making of the Gay Male World, 1890–1940 (New York: Basic Books), pp. 237–44; on Stonewall Inn and its place in history of gay liberation in US, see D’Emilio and Freedman Intimate Matters, pp. 318–25.Google Scholar
  11. 29.
    P. Robinson (2011) ‘The Influence of Ageism on Relations between Old and Young Gay Men’ in Y. Smaal and G. Willett (eds) Out Here: Gay and Lesbian Perspectives VI (Melbourne: Monash University Publishing), pp. 188–200.Google Scholar
  12. 31.
    S.O. Murray (2000) Homosexualities (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), p. 440.Google Scholar
  13. 33.
    G. Robb (2004) Strangers: Homosexual Love in the C19th Century (London: Pan Macmillan).Google Scholar
  14. 34.
    A. Stein (1997) Sex and Sensibility: Stories of a Lesbian Generation (Berkeley: University of California Press), pp. 152–3.Google Scholar
  15. 44.
    S. Khan (1996) ‘Culture, Sexualities, and Identities’, London: Naz Foundation International; http://www.nfi.net/articles_essays.htm, accessed 17 October 2012.Google Scholar
  16. 45.
    S. Nanda (1999) Neither Man nor Woman: The Hijras of India, 2nd edn (London: International Thomson), pp. 38, 40.Google Scholar
  17. 47.
    J. Weeks (2000) Making Sexual History (Cambridge: Polity Press), pp. 216–20; see also Robinson Changing World, pp. 149–50.Google Scholar
  18. 50.
    N. Elias (1987) The Loneliness of the Dying, trans. E. Jephcott (Oxford: Basil Blackwell), p. 74.Google Scholar
  19. 56.
    M. Warner (2000) The Trouble with Normal: Sex, Politics, and the Ethics of Queer Life (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), pp. 61–80.Google Scholar
  20. M.B. Sycamore (ed.) (2004) That’s Revolting! Queer Strategies for Resisting Assimilation (Berkeley, CA: Counterpoint LLC), p. 2.Google Scholar
  21. 57.
    H. McQueen (1998) Temper Democratic: How Exceptional Is Australia? (Adelaide: Wakefield Press).Google Scholar
  22. R. Sennett (1998) The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism (New York: W.W. Norton).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Peter Robinson 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Robinson
    • 1
  1. 1.Swinburne University of TechnologyAustralia

Personalised recommendations