The Ritual of Insurrection and the ‘Thrill-Seeking Youth’. An Instant Ethnography of Inner-City Riots in Germany

  • Laura Naegler

Abstract

Around the early 2000s, the periodic riots in Hamburg’s inner-city neighbourhood of Sternschanze changed profoundly. For decades, these riots constituted struggles between state authorities and militant anarchists of the autonome Szene (autonomous scene), entwined around resistance to consumer capitalism, control and police repression, and contestations over the production and use of urban space. However, the rapid gentrification of Sternschanze — which has turned from a lower-class area into a popular nightlife district and expensive neighbourhood for the bohemian middle class in recent years (Naegler, 2012) — also changed the character and public perception of the riots. Over the years, the agitated evocations of supposed terrorist threats caused by militant ‘black bloc’ anarchists that used to interfuse the public discourse on riots were replaced by moral outrage about adolescent, apolitical rioters vandalising the gentrified, hip and trendy neighbourhood. This notion became so popular in public discourse that a new term came into being to describe these young people: they are the so-called erlebnisorientierte Jugendliche (thrill-seeking youth). The term is exclusively meant for those teenagers who participate in riots not out of any political motivation but for the sake of the adrenaline rush, excitement and pleasure found in violence and vandalism.

Keywords

Burning Europe Amid Resis Smoke 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AK Wantok (2010). Perspektiven Autonomer Politik. Münster: Unrast Verlag.Google Scholar
  2. Altenried, M. (2012). Aufstände, Rassismus und die Krise des Kapitalismus. England im Ausnahmezustand. Münster: Edition Assemblage.Google Scholar
  3. Barnholden, M. (2005). Reading the Riot Act: A Brief History of Riots in Vancouver. Vancouver: Anvil Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bauman, Z. (2011). The London riots — On consumerism coming home to roost. Social Europe Journal. Retrieved from http://www.social-europe.eu/2011/08/the-london-riots-on-consumerism-coming-home-to-roost/.
  5. Delia Porta, D. and Diani, M. (2006). Social Movements. An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Diani, M. (1992). The concept of social movement. The Sociological Review, 40(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Drury, J. and Reicher, S. (1999). The intergroup dynamics of collective empowerment: Substantiating the social identity model of crowd behavior. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2(4), 381–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferrell, J. (1995). Urban graffiti: Crime, control and resistance. Youth & Society, 27(1), 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferrell, J. (1996). Crimes of Style. Urban Graffiti and the Politics of Criminality. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Ferrell, J. (2004). Boredom, crime and criminology. Theoretical Criminology, 8(3), 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferrell, J. (2005). The only possible adventure: Edgework and anarchy. In S. Lyng (Ed.), Edgework: The Sociology of Risk Taking. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Ferrell, J. (2007). For a ruthless cultural criticism of everything existing. Crime, Media, Culture, 3(1), 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferrell, J. (2010). Cultural criminology. The loose can[o]n. In E. McLaughlin and T. Newburn (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Criminological Theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Ferrell, J., Hayward, K., and Young, J. (2008). Cultural Criminology: An Invitation. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Geronimo (2002). Feuer und Flamme: Zur Geschichte der Autonomen. Frankfurt: ID Verlag.Google Scholar
  16. Hall, S. (2012). Consumer culture and the meaning of the urban riots in England. In S. Hall (Ed.), New Directions in Criminological Theory. Oxford: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  17. Hall, S. and Winlow, S. (2007). Cultural criminology and primitive accumulation. A formal introduction to two strangers who should really become more intimate. Crime, Media, Culture, 3(1), 82–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hall, S. and Winlow, S. (2012). A predictably obedient riot: Postpolitics, consumer culture and the English riots of 2011. Cultural Politics, 8, 465–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamburger Abendblatt (2010). Denn dein Ziel ist das Chaos, die Gewalt. Die Zerstörung. Retrieved from http://www.abendblatt.de/hamburg/articlel480392/Denn-dein-ziel-ist-das-chaos-die-gewalt-die-zerstoerung.html.
  20. Harvey, D. (2011). Feral Capitalism Hits the Streets. Retrieved from http://davidharvey.org/2011/08/feral-capitalism-hits-the-streets/.
  21. Hayward, K. (2004). City Limits. Crime, Consumer Culture and the Urban Experience. London: Glasshouse Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hayward, K. and Young, J. (2004). Cultural criminology: Some notes on the script. Theoretical Criminology, 8(3), 259–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hollander, J. and Einwohner, R. (2004). Conceptualizing resistance. Sociological Forum, 19(4), 533–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jobard, F. (2009). Rioting as a political tool: The 2005 riots in France. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 48(3), 235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Katz, J. (1988). Seductions of Crime: Moral and Sensual Attractions in Doing Evil. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  26. Le Bon, G. (1947, 1986). The Crowd: Study of the Popular Mind. London: Ernest Benn.Google Scholar
  27. Lyng, S. (1990). Edgework: A social psychological analysis of voluntary risk taking. The American Journal of Sociology, 95(4), 851–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lyng, S. (2004). Crime, edgework and corporeal transaction. Theoretical Criminology, 8(3), 359–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lyng, S. (2005a). Edgework and the risk-taking experience. In S. Lyng (Ed.), Edgework: The Sociology of Risk-Taking. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Lyng, S. (2005b). Sociology at the edge: Social theory and voluntary risk taking. In S. Lyng (Ed.), Edgework: The Sociology of Risk-Taking. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Matza, D. and Sykes, G. (1961). Juvenile delinquency and subterranean values. American Sociological Review, 26(5), 712–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. May, T. (2011). London rioters ‘will be brought to justice’. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-14449979
  33. Naegler, L. (2012). Gentriftcation and Resistance: Cultural Criminology, Control, and the Commodification of Urban Protest in Hamburg. Berlin: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
  34. Presdee, M. (2000). Cultural Criminology and the Carnival of Crime. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schwarzmeier, J. (1999). Die Autonomen Zwischen Subkultur Und Sozialer Bewegung. Göttingen: Books on Demand.Google Scholar
  36. Scott, C. and Drury, J. (2000). Crowds, context and identity: Dynamic categorization processes in the ‘poll tax riot’. Human Relations, 53(2), 247–273.Google Scholar
  37. Wehrheim, J. (2006). Die überwachte Stadt-Sicherheit, Segregation und Ausgrenzung. Opladen: Verlag Barbara Budrich.Google Scholar
  38. Weitz, R. (2011). Women and their hair: Seeking power through resistance and accommodation. Gender and Society, 15(5), 667–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Young, J. (1999). The Exclusive Society: Social Exclusion, Crime and Difference in Late Modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Young, J. (2003). Merton with energy, Katz with structure: The sociology of vin-dictiveness and the criminology of transgression. Theoretical Criminology, 7(3), 388–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Young, J. (2007). The Vertigo of Late Modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Young, J. (2010). Subcultural Theory: Virtues and Vices. Retrieved from http://www.malcolmread.co.uk/JockYoung/subculture.htm.
  43. Young, J. (2011). The Criminological Imagination. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  44. Zimbardo, P.G. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. In W.T. Arnold and D. Levine (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1969. Lincoln: University of Nebraska, 17, 237–307.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Laura Naegler 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura Naegler

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations