Abstract
This chapter, in keeping with the objectives of the Handbook, focuses on membership associations. However, in so doing, it offers a different perspective on several fundamental issues by utilizing an emerging theory of organizational hybridity. This reveals three interdependent sectors (third, public, and private), each of which overwhelmingly consists of organizations that share common principles. Yet each sector also contains hybrids: organizations that have also absorbed significant features of their neighboring sectors. Despite this, hybrids nevertheless retain their prime adherence to the principles, the rules of the game, of one sector. This prime sector accountability becomes particularly problematic in turbulent times; but awareness of the nature of hybridity, and ways of controlling and managing it, is essential for organizational maintenance, change, and even survival.
And what of associations? The analysis adopts a decision-making approach to the nature of ownership and membership and concludes that the core organizational principles of the association provide the raison d’être for the entire, normal, third sector.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Aiken, Mike. 2010. “Social Enterprises: Challenges from the Field.” Pp. 153–174 in Hybrid Organisations and the Third Sector, edited by D. Billis. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan
Bacchiega, Alberto, and Carlo Borzaga. 2001. “Social Enterprises as Incentives Structures: an Economic Analysis.” Pp. 273–295 in The Emergence of Social Enterprise, edited by C. Borzaga and J. Defourny. London: Routledge
Billis, David. 1977. “Differential Administrative Capacity and Organisational Development.” Human Relations 30(2):109–127
Billis, David. 1979. “Voluntary Organisations: Management Issues 1: Report from February 1979 Workshop.” Programme of Research and Training into Voluntary Action (PORTVAC), Brunel Institute of Organisation and Social Studies, Uxbridge, UK
Billis, David. 1984. Welfare Bureaucracies: Their Design and Change in Response to Social Problems. London: Heinemann
Billis, David. ed. 2010. Hybrid Organizations and the Third Sector: Challenges for Practice, Theoty and Policy. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan
Billis, David, and Howard Glennerster. 1998. “Human Services and the Voluntary Sector: Towards a Theory of Comparative Advantage.” Journal of Social Policy 27(1): 79–98
Bozeman, Barry. 1987. All Organizations are Public: Bridging Public and Private Organizational Theories. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Brandsen, Taco, Wim van de Donk, and Kim Putters. 2005. “Griffins or Chameleons? Hybridity as a Permanent and Inevitable Characteristic of the Third Sector.” International Journal of Public Administration 28: 749–765
Burgess, Simon, and Marisa Ratto. 2003. “The Role of Incentives in the Public Sector: Issues and Evidence.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 19(2):285–300
Cornforth, Chris, and Roger Spear. 2010. “The Governance of Hybrid Organizations.” Pp. 70–90 in Hybrid Organisations and the Third Sector, edited by D. Billis. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan
Czischke, Darinka. 2012. “Conceptualising Social Enterprise in Housing Organisations.” Housing Studies 27(4):418–437
Borzaga, Carlo, and Jacques Defourny, eds. 2001. The Emergence of Social Enterprise. London: Routledge
Defourny, Jacques, and Marthe Nyssens. 2012. “The EMES Approach of Social Enterprise in a Comparative Perspective.” EMES European Research Network, Working Paper no. 12/03:1–24
Evers, Adelbert. 1995. “Part of the Welfare Mix: The Third Sector as an Intermediate Area.” Voluntas 6(2):159–182
Evers, Adelber. 2005. “Mixed Welfare Systems and Hybrid Organizations: Changes in the Governance and Provision of Social Services.” International Journal of Public Administration 28:737–748
Evers, Adelbert and J. Laville. 2004. “Social Services by Social Enterprise: On the Possible Contributions of Hybrid Organizations and a Civil Society.” Pp. 237–255 in The Third Sector in Europe, edited by A. Evers and J. Laville. London: Edward Elgar
Ellis-Paine, Angela, Nick Ockenden, and Joanna Stuart. 2010. “Volunteers in Hybrid Organizations: A Marginalised Majority?” Pp. 93–114 in Hybrid Organisations and the Third Sector, edited by D. Billis. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan
Hemming, Henry. 2011. Together: How Small Groups Achieve Big Things. London: John Murray
Knoke, David. 1990. Organizing for Collective Action: The Political Economies of Associations. New York: Aldine de Gruyter
Koppell, Jonathan. 2003. The Politics of Quasi-Government: Hybrid Organizations and the Dynamics of Bureaucratic Control. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Kramer, Ralph. 1981. Voluntary Agencies in the Welfare State. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
Kreutzer, Karin, and Urse Jager. 2011. “Volunteering Versus Managerialism: Conflict over Organizational Identity in Voluntary Associations.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 40(4):634–661
Lan, Zhiyong, and Hal G. Rainey. 1992. “Goals, Roles, and Effectiveness in Public, Private, and Hybrid Organizations: More Evidence on Frequent Assertions about Differences.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2(1):5–28
Leach, Edmund. 1976. Culture and Communication, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Lee, Young-Joo, and Vicky M. Wilkins. 2001. “More Similarities or More Differences? Comparing Public and Nonprofit Managers’ Job Motivations.” Public Administration Review 71(1):45–56
Lohmann, Roger. A. 1992. The Commons: New Perspectives on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Michels, Robert. 1962. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: Collier Books
Minkoff, Debra. C., and Walter W. Powell. 2006. “Nonprofit Mission: Constancy, Responsiveness, or Deflection?” Pp. 591–611 in The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, 2nd. edition, edited by W. W. Powell and R. Steinberg. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Mullins, David, and Hal Pawson. 2010. “Housing Associations: Agents of Policy or Profits in Disguise?” Pp. 197–218 in Hybrid Organisations and the Third Sector, edited by D. Billis. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan
Musolph, Lloyd D., and Harold Seidman. 1980. “The Blurred Boundaries of Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 40(2):124–130
NCVO. 2012. UK Civil Society Almanac. London: National Council of Voluntary Organisations
Nyssens, Marthe, Sophie Adam, and Toby Johnson. 2006. Social Enterprise: At the Crossroads of Market, Public Policies and Civil Society. London: Routledge
Perry, James L., and Hal G. Rainey. 1988. “The Public-Private Distinction in Organization Theory: A Critique and Research Strategy.” The Academy of Management Review 13(2):182–201
Pestoff, Victor A. 1998. Beyond the Market and State: Social Enterprises and Civil Democracy in a Welfare Society. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate
Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster
Rainey, Hal G., Robert W. Backoff, and Charles Levine. 1976. “Comparing Public and Private Organizations.” Public Administration Review 36 (March—April):276–286
Rochester, Colin, and Malcolm Tony. 2010. “Faith-Based Organizations and Hybridity: A Special Case?” Pp. 114–133 in Hybrid Organisations and the Third Sector, edited by D. Billis. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan
Skelcher, Chris. 2005. “Public-Private Partnerships and Hybridity.” Pp. 347–370 in The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, edited by E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn, and C. Pollitt. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
Smith, David H. 1991. “Four Sectors or Five? Retaining the Member-Benefit Sector.” Nonprofit and Voluntaty Sector Quarterly 20:137–150
Smith, David H. 1997. “The Rest of the Nonprofit Sector: Grassroots Associations as the Dark Matter Ignored in Prevailing ‘Flat Earth’ Maps of the Sector.” Nonprofit and Voluntaty Sector Quarterly 26(2):114–131
Smith, David H. 2000. Grassroots Associations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Smith, David H. 2016. “A Survey of Voluntaristics: Research on the Growth of the Global, Interdisciplinary, Socio-Behavioral Science Field and Emergent Inter-Discipline.” Voluntaristics Review: Brill Research Perspectives 1(2):1–81
Smith, Justin D., Colin Rochester, and Rodney Hedley. 1995. An Introduction to the Voluntaty Sector. London: Routledge
Smith, Steven R. 2010. “Hybridization and Nonprofit Organizations: The Governance Challenge.” Policy and Society 29(3):219–229
Thornton, Patricia H., and William Ocasio. [2008] 2013. “Institutional Logics.” Pp. 99–129 in The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, and R. Suddaby. London: Sage Publications
Van Til, Jon. 1988. Mapping the Third Sector: Voluntarism in a Changing Social Economy. New York: The Foundation Center
Wamsley, Gary L. and Mayer N. Zald. 1976. The Political Economy of Public Organisations. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press
Warren, Mark E. 2001. Democracy and Association. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Weber, Max, and Talcott Parsons, eds. [1947] 1964. The Theoty of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Free Press
Weisbrod, Burton A. 1998. To Profit or Not to Profit: The Commercial Transformation of the Nonprofit Sector. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Billis, D. (2016). Hybrid Associations and Blurred Sector Boundaries. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Volunteering, Civic Participation, and Nonprofit Associations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-26317-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-26317-9_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-26316-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-26317-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)