Skip to main content

Cuba: From Exception to Democratization?

  • Chapter
Debating Cuban Exceptionalism

Part of the book series: Studies of the Americas ((STAM))

  • 30 Accesses

Abstract

I am not an expert on Cuba: although I have learned many things about Latin America from my students, I have not had the good fortune to learn about Cuba to the same extent. So, even the familiar notion of Cuban exceptionalism that Laurence Whitehead so eloquently describes in this book was new in a sense. From a familiarity with international history I knew, of course, that Cuba was not part of the wave of anticolonial, republican revolutions that swept through Spanish America during the first quarter of the nineteenth century, and I knew that the island was the last major Spanish colony in the Western Hemisphere until the Spanish-American War. And from U.S. history, I was also familiar with Cuba’s special status, as symbolized by the Platt Amendment that was forcibly incorporated into the country’s first republican constitution and was bolstered by repeated direct and indirect U.S. interventions in Cuban internal affairs. Finally as a student of comparative democratic transitions in communist Eastern Europe, I was very much aware that Cuba belonged neither to the set of democratizing countries of the 1980s or early 1990s. What I had not realized until reading Laurence Whitehead’s contribution to this volume is that these three separate and exceptional circumstances may very well be interrelated. I had always thought and hoped that Cuba might simply become a belated member of either sequence of transitions, or of both, and that it would simply take longer to begin and end that process in Cuban than in Latin America’s other most protracted case—that of Mexico. My view was that because the Cuban dictatorship, like the Mexican, was the product of an indigenous social revolution, this fact and the regime’s attendant special legitimacy resources might lead regime forces to initiate a protracted transition carefully controlled “from above.”1 Whatever the normative desirability of such a path as compared with others (such a lengthy process usually makes it more vulnerable to uncertainty and reversal), this seemed to be the most likely kind of transition in Cuba.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Andrew Arato, “Interpreting 1989,” chapter 1, in Civil Society, Constitution and Legitimacy (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2000), pp. 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Janos Kornai, “The Reproduction of Shortage,” in Janos Kornai (ed.), Contradictions and Dilemmas: Studies on the Socialist Economy and Society (Harvard, MA: MIT Press, 1986), pp. 6–32.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Andrew Arato, “The Occupation of Iraq and the Difficult Transition from Dictatorship,” Constellations, 10 (3), September 2003: 408–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. See Adam Przeworski, Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Andrew Arato, “The Round Tables, Democratic Institutions and the Problem of Justice,” in András Bozoki (ed.), The Round Table of 1989. The Genesis of Hungarian Democracy: Analysis and Documents (Budapest: Central European University Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  6. See also Alfred Stepan (ed.), Democratizing Brazil: Problems of Transition and Consolidation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989), particularly the introduction. See also Przeworski, Democracy and the Market.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Andrew Arato, “Interim Imposition,” Ethics and International Affairs, 18 (3), Winter 2004: 25–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Bert Hoffmann Laurence Whitehead

Copyright information

© 2007 Bert Hoffmann and Laurence Whitehead

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arato, A. (2007). Cuba: From Exception to Democratization?. In: Hoffmann, B., Whitehead, L. (eds) Debating Cuban Exceptionalism. Studies of the Americas. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-12353-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics