Skip to main content

Raising the Bar: Brilliant Women Lawyers from Ann Kelsey to Miranda Hobbes

  • Chapter
  • 41 Accesses

Abstract

If you see a beautiful young woman in a snappy business suit on your television set, chances are she is a lawyer. Since L.A. Law’s debut in 1986, countless shows—both with legal themes and otherwise—have featured women lawyers as significant characters, with more arriving every season. This trend is not new; popular culture has long been fascinated with the image of the female attorney. From Shakespeare’s Portia to the 2006 midseason premiere of Courting Alex, the female lawyer has appeared in countless films, plays, novels, and television series.1 Academics and critics interested in popular culture have noticed her and devoted many articles and even books to her.2 With this chapter, we add to this lively discussion a study of brilliance in television’s women lawyers. Intelligence in these characters echoes society’s understanding of “smartness” in real women lawyers. However, the intelligence of television’s female lawyers occurs amid many unrealistic contextual factors and gives a distorted image of women in the profession. Television shows us beautiful, brainy female lawyers who can display their smartness by practicing in any area they like and in any manner they like, but whose intelligence is undercut by an inability to have successful personal relationships. Real women attorneys often do not have beauty to accompany their brilliance, have been traditionally relegated to showing their intellectual abilities in particular areas and through particular methods of lawyering, and are sometimes married and have children. The disparity between the popular culture picture of female attorneys and real women lawyers suggests much about how U.S. society conceptualizes brilliance.

Keywords

  • Eating Disorder
  • Popular Culture
  • Legal Profession
  • Television Series
  • Professional Woman

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-1-137-08421-7_9
  • Chapter length: 16 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-1-137-08421-7
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For example, see Cynthia Lucia, Framing Female Lawyers: Women on Trial in Film (Austin: University of Texas Press, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stacey Caplow, “Still in the Dark: Disappointing Images of Women Lawyers in the Movies,” Women’s Rights Law Reporter 20, no. 2/3 (1999): 55.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Michael Asimow, “Embodiment of Evil: Law Firms in the Movies,” UCLA Law Review 48 (2000): 1339.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hannah Dugan, “Does Gender Still Matter in the Legal Profession?” Wisconsin Lawyer 75 (2002): 10.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rebecca Korzec, “Working on the ‘Mommy-Track’: Motherhood and Women Lawyers,” Hastings Women s Law Journal 8 (1997): 117.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Marjorie Kornhauser, “Rooms of Their Own: An Empirical Study of Occupational Segregation by Gender among Law Professors,” University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review 73.2 (2004): 293.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carole Shapiro, “Women Lawyers in Celluloid: Why Hollywood Skirts the Truth,” University of Toledo Law Review 25 (1994): 955.

    Google Scholar 

  8. For a study of eating disorders in female attorneys, see Julie E. Buchwald, “Confronting a Hazard: Do Eating Disorders Plague Women in the Legal Profession?” Southern California Review of Law and Women’s Studies 9.1 (1999): 101.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stephen Gillers, “Taking L.A. Law More Seriously,” Yale Law Journal 98 (1989): 1607.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. See, for example, Lisa Scottoline, “Get Off the Screen,” Nova Law Review 24 (1999): 655.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See Ric Sheffield, “On Film: A Social History of Women Lawyers in Popular Culture, 1930–1990,” Loyola L.A. Entertainment Law Journal 14 (1993–1994): 73–111

    Google Scholar 

  12. Carol Gilligan, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development (Boston: Harvard University Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Deborah L. Rhode, “Perspective on Professional Women,” Stanford Law Review 40 (1988): 1163.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  14. Naomi Mezey and Mark C. Niles, in “Screening the Law: Ideology and Law in American Popular Culture,” Columbia Journal of Law and Arts 28 (2005): 91

    Google Scholar 

  15. See Christine Alice Corcos, “‘We Don’t Want Advantages’: The Woman Lawyer Hero and Her Quest for Power in Popular Culture,” Syracuse Law Review 53 (2003): 1225

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. G. Marek. “The Practice and Ally McBeal: A New Image for Women Lawyers on Television?” Journal of American Culture 22.1 (1999): 77.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  17. Carole Shapiro, “Women Lawyers in Celluloid, Rewrapped,” Vermont Law Review 23 (1998–1999): 304.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Carolyn Lisa Miller, “ ‘What a Waste. Beautiful, Sexy Gal. Hell of a Lawyer.’ Film and the Female Attorney,” Columbia Journal of Gender and Law 4 (1994): 203.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Diane Klein, “Ally McBeal and Her Sisters: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Representations of Women Lawyers in Prime Time Television,” Loyola L.A. Entertainment Law Journal 18 (1997–1998): 259.

    Google Scholar 

  20. David Papke, “Cautionary Tales: The Woman as Lawyer in Contemporary Hollywood Cinema,” University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review 25.3 (2003): 485

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2007 Sherrie A. Inness

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sutherland, S., Swan, S. (2007). Raising the Bar: Brilliant Women Lawyers from Ann Kelsey to Miranda Hobbes. In: Inness, S.A. (eds) Geek Chic: Smart Women in Popular Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-08421-7_9

Download citation