Skip to main content

Mad Love: Re-Membering Berlin in Hollywood Exile

  • Chapter
Caught by Politics

Part of the book series: Studies in European Culture and History ((SECH))

  • 46 Accesses

Abstract

In his book An Accented Cinema, Hamid Naficy has offered the most rigorous attempt to date to understand certain cinematic practices as expressions of exile and cultural displacement. According to Naficy, accented films—films that are produced under the condition of forced or voluntary dislocation—"are interstitial because they are created astride and in the interstices of social formations and cinematic practices. Consequently, they are simultaneously local and global, and they resonate against the prevailing cinematic production practices, at the same time that they benefit from them."1 Exilic filmmaking, in Naficy’s view, cannot but operate in critical distance to mainstream cinema. Exile cinemas explore their own smallness and imperfection, their lack of shine, their artisanal status, as a source of creative authenticity and critical meaning. They defy genre formulas and cinematic realism in order to utilize the filmic medium as a mouthpiece for personal narratives of loss, nostalgia, transition, and reconfiguration. In conflict with mass cultural norms of narrative closure and resolution, exile filmmakers tell ruptured and often highly subjective stories. Their films are film-letters and letter-films, addressed to often very narrowly defined audiences. These films’ narrative energies and formal designs communicate a sense of claustrophobia and shattered temporality, of contorted space and warped time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Hamid Naficy, An Accented Cinema: Exilic and Diasporic Filmmaking (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. David Bordwell, “Art-Cinema Narration,” Narration in the Fiction Film (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1985), 205–233.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sigmund Freud, “The Uncanny,” The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, ed. and trans. James Strachey, 24 vols. (London: Hogarth, 1953), XVII: 219–252.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tom Gunning, The Films of Fritz Lang: Allegories of Vision and Modernity (London: British Film Institute, 2000), 2.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Edward W. Said, Representations of the Intellectual (New York: Vintage Books, 1996), 49.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thomas Elsaesser, Weimar Cinema and After: Germany’s Historical Imaginary (London: Routledge, 2000), 380.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Steven Thornton, “Mad Love, 1935,” Peter Lorre, ed. Gary J. Svehla and Susan Svehla (Baltimore: Midnight Marquee Press, 1999), 51.

    Google Scholar 

  8. For a persuasive rethinking of horror’s sexual politics, see Carol J. Clover, Men, Women, and Chain Saws: Gender in the Modern Horror Film (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  9. For more on the masochistic aesthetic, see Gilles Deleuze, Masochism: An Interpretation of Coldness and Cruelty (New York: George Braziller, 1971)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gaylyn Studlar, In the Realm of Pleasure: Von Sternberg, Dietrich, and the Masochistic Aesthetic (New York: Columbia University Press, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Laura Mulvey, “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema,” Visual and Other Pleasures (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1989), 14–26.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. See the various contributions to Michael Omasta, Brigitte Mayr, and Elisabeth Streit, eds., Peter Lorre: Ein Fremder im Paradies (Vienna: Zsolnay/Kino, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, Kafka: Toward a Minor Literature, trans. Dana Polan (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1986), 22.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Anton Kaes, M (London: BFI, 2000), 24.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Anton Kaes, “The Cold Gaze: Notes on Mobilization and Modernity,” New German Critique, 59 (Spring/Summer 1993): 105–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Quoted in Claudia Kaiser, “Peter Lorre alias Mr. Murder. Ein Doppelgänger zwischen Europa und Amerika,” Der Verlorene, ed. Michael Farin and Hans Schmid (Munich: Belleville, 1996), 271.

    Google Scholar 

  17. James Naremore, Acting in Cinema (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988), 131.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Andreas Huyssen, “Fortifying the Heart-Totally: Ernst Jüngers Armored Texts,” New German Critique, 59 (Spring/Summer 1993): 11.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thomas Elsaesser, “Ethnicity, Authenticity, and Exile: A Counterfeit Trade? German Filmmakers in Hollywood,” Home, Exile, Homeland: Film, Media, and the Politics of Place, ed. Hamid Naficy (New York: Routledge, 1999), 100.

    Google Scholar 

  20. For more on Henreid’s exile, see Peter Nau, “Vor Sonnenuntergang. Paul Henreid in Hollywood,” Schatten.Exil: Europäische Emigranten im Film Noir, ed. Christian Cargnelli and Michael Omasta (Vienna: PVS Verleger, 1997), 89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Joseph Goebbels, Michael: A Novel, trans. Joachim Neugroschel (New York: Amok Press, 1987), 14.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Eric Rentschier, The Ministry of Illusion: Nazi Cinema and Its Afterlife (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Peter Bürger, Theory of the Avant-Garde, trans. Michael Shaw (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  24. For a more detailed reading of Phantom Lady, see Lutz Koepnick, The Dark Mirror: German Cinema between Hitler and Hollywood (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002), 164–200.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stephen D. Younkin, “Der Insider als Outsider: Die Emigration des Peter Lorre,” Peter Lorre: Portrait des Schauspielers auf der Flucht, ed. Felix Hofmann and Stephen D. Younkin (Munich: Belleville, 1998), 107–161.

    Google Scholar 

  26. For an astute analysis of Lorre’s 1951 film, see Jennifer M. Kapczynski, “Peter Lorre’s The Lost Man and the End of Exile,” New German Critique, 89 (Spring/Summer 2003): 145–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Sabine Eckmann Lutz Koepnick

Copyright information

© 2007 Sabine Eckmann and Lutz Koepnick

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Koepnick, L. (2007). Mad Love: Re-Membering Berlin in Hollywood Exile. In: Eckmann, S., Koepnick, L. (eds) Caught by Politics. Studies in European Culture and History. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-08032-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics