Skip to main content

Future/Present: The End of Science Fiction

  • Chapter
Imagining Apocalypse
  • 41 Accesses

Abstract

Science fiction is (once again) undergoing an identity crisis; or, to put it more extremely, science fiction is (once again) coming to an end.2 Like other postmodern subjects, it has become fragmented and decentred; its boundaries have become fluid and its outlines blurred. Science fiction is now, more clearly than ever, a subject-inprocess; its erstwhile ‘fixed’ identity has become indeterminate and changeable. The texts which today constitute it as a generic field have themselves become widely dispersed and wildly heterogeneous, and/as its interactions with time and history have undergone a series of sea-changes. This essay is an attempt to think about science fiction at once as an ‘impossible’ genre within the context of postmodernity and a particularly relevant discursive field within the same context.3

‘We no longer feel that we penetrate the future. Futures penetrate us.’ (John Clute)1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. John Clute, ‘Introduction,’ Interzone: The 2nd Anthology, ed. Clute, David Pringle, and Simon Ounsley (London: Simon and Schuster, 1987), p. vii.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Veronica Hollinger, ‘Specular SF: Postmodern Allegory,’ State of the Fantastic: Studies in the Theory and Practice of Fantastic Literature and Film, ed. Nicholas Ruddick ( Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992 ), p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Critic John Clute suggests the phrase ‘first sf’ to denote ‘genre sf’ or ‘old sf’ or ‘agenda sf.’ As Clute maintains, ‘The old sf is dead; and the change is in us […] But there are still dinosaurs’ (Look at the Evidence: Essays and Reviews [New York: Serconia Press, 1995], p. 279).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Istvan Csicsery-Ronay, Jr., ‘The SF of Theory: Baudrillard and Haraway,’ Science-Fiction Studies 18 (Nov. 1991), p. 390.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Robert Sheckley, ‘The Life of Anybody’ (1984), The Norton Book of Science Fiction: North American Science Fiction, 1960-1990, ed. Ursula K. Le Guin and Brian Attebery ( New York: Norton, 1993 ), p. 570.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jean Baudrillard, ‘The Ecstacy of Communication,’ trans. John Johnston, The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture, ed. Hal Foster ( Port Townsend, WA: Bay Press, 1983 ), p. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fredric Jameson, ‘Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism,’ New Left Review, 146 (July/August 1984), p. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jameson, ‘Cultural Logic,’ 65–66. A similar effect is discussed by N. Katherine Hayles as the ‘flattening out’ of our sense of time as the result of a kind of Tofflerian ‘future shock.’ She speculates that ‘Part of our sense that time has flattened out derives from uncertainty about where we as human beings fit into our own future scenarios’: Chaos Bound: Orderly Disorder in Contemporary Literature and Science ( Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990 ), p. 280.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Darko Suvin, Metamorphoses of Science Fiction: On the Poetics and History of a Literary Genre ( New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979 ), p. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fredric Jameson, ‘Progress versus Utopia, or Can We Imagine the Future?’ (1982), Art After Modernism: Rethinking Representation, ed. Brian Wallis ( New York: The New Museum of Contemporary Art, 1984 ), p. 243.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fredric Jameson, ‘Postmodernism and Consumer Society,’ The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture, ed. Hal Foster (Port Townsend, Wa: Bay Press, 1983); see especially pp. 118–121.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jacob Kessel, ‘Invaders’ (1990), The Norton Book of Science Fiction, p. 848.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2000 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hollinger, V. (2000). Future/Present: The End of Science Fiction. In: Seed, D. (eds) Imagining Apocalypse. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07657-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07657-1_15

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-62247-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-07657-1

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics