Skip to main content

Afghanistan: NATO’s Last Hurrah?

  • Chapter
NATO After 9/11
  • 59 Accesses

Abstract

In January 2004, NATO’s new secretary general, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, traveled to Washington, DC to deliver a speech at the National Defense University. The challenges confronting the Alliance and the new secretary general in early 2004 were considerable. Since 9/11, NATO had dramatically expanded its membership, increased its partner relationships, pledged to ameliorate the military capabilities gap, established a rapid reaction force, and committed to operations far from the inclusive borders of the Alliance’s member-states. Hopes of building upon this ambitious agenda were tempered by political divisions among members of the Alliance, particularly over Iraq. Indeed, as Scheffer approached his audience at the National Defense University, he was well aware that at no other time in the history of the Alliance had so many questioned the long-term effectiveness and viability of NATO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Diego A. Ruiz Palmer, “The Road to Kabul,” NATO Review 2 (Summer 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amin Tarzi, “NATO’s Involvement in Afghanistan Between the Prague and Istanbul Summits.” RFE/RL Afghanistan Report 3/22, June 18, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Canada, France, and Greece expressed opposition to increasing their preexisting commitments to ISAE See. Amin Tarzi, “NATO’s First Mission to the Greater Middle East,” RFE/RL Afghanistan Report 2/38 October 30, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Michael R. Craig, “Threats and Responses: Afghan Security; NATO Chiefs Says Alliance Needs Role In Afghanistan,” New York Times, February 21, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gareth Harding, “NATO Weighs Roles in Iraq, Afghanistan,” United Press International, April 3, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carlotta Gall, “Afghan Envoy Warns U.S. of Possible Major Attacks,” New York Times, October 8, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Robert McMahon, “UN Says Terror, Factional Fighting, Drugs Threaten Afghan Political Process,” RFE/RL Afghanistan Report, November 20, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kathy Gannon, “Afghanistan Unbound,” Foreign Affairs 83/3 (May/June 2004): 38.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Amin Tarzi, “Analysis: Afghanistan Wants Greater NATO Involvement.” Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ann Scott Tyson, “NATO Far From Relieving US Forces in Afghanistan,” The Christian Science Monitor, December 9, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Judy Dempsey, “NATO Must Modernize and Rethink Its Strategy,” Financial Times, June 25, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gareth Harding, “Analysis: NATO Flirts with Afghan Failure,” United Press International, June 29, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Paul Ames, “U.S. and France Clash over Iraq, Afghanistan and Turkey,” The Associated Press, June 29, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Craig S. Smith, “NATO Runs Short of Troops in Expanded Afghan Peacekeeping,” New York Times, September 18, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Michael Thurston, “Afghanistan’s ‘Wild West’: NATO’s New Frontier,” Agence France Presse (English), July 3, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Elaine Sciolino, “The Great Divide: The U.S. and Europe Stretch to Close It,” New York Times, December 8, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Martin Sieff, “Analysis: Germany Torpedoes U.S. Afghan Strategy,” United Press International, October 13, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Judy Dempsey, “U.S. and NATO Plan Joint Afghan Mission; Alliance is ‘Committed for the Long Term,’ “The International Herald Tribune, February 12, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Amin Tarzi, “Cautious Optimism Emerges from Past 12 Months,” RFEIRL Afghanistan Report, January 6, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Carlotta Gall, “Mood of Anxiety Engulfs Afghans as Violence Rises,” New York Times, June 30, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ron Synovitz, “Afghanistan: Security Situation Deteriorated During May,” Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, May 21, 2005; and “Taliban Claim Responsibility for Bomb and Rocket Aimed at NATO Troops,” Agence France Presse (English), May 30, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nikola Krastev, “Afghanistan: UN Highlights Long-Term Drug Threat,” Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, June 29, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bruce Cheadle, “Afghan Drug Trade Tough to Battle,” London Free Press (Ontario), June 11, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Naz Nazar, “UN Says Opium Production ‘Clear and Present Danger’ to Afghanistan’s Future,” Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. June 29, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ahto Lobjakas, “NATO: Secretary-General Discusses Afghanistan, Greater Middle East, and Alliance’s Expansion,” Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, March 9, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Robin Cook, “We Owe It to the People of Afghanistan to Repair Their Broken, Blighted Land,” The Independent, July 2, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2006 Richard E. Rupp

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rupp, R.E. (2006). Afghanistan: NATO’s Last Hurrah?. In: NATO After 9/11. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-05075-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics