Skip to main content

Responsibility and Terror: Visual Culture and Violence in the Precarious Life

  • Chapter
The Logics of Biopower and the War on Terror

Abstract

In Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence, Judith Butler argues that 9/11 produced a “dislocation” of “First World privilege” for citizens of the United States. Watching the events of 9/11, the “secure” in the first world were exposed to a feeling of vulnerability that is usually experienced in “failed states” and “disaster zones.” For Butler, this dislocation of first world privilege does not have to result in acts of violent protection or retaliation:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Judith Butler, Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence (London: Verso, 2004), p. xii.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For an exploration of these “other passages” see Giovanna Borradori, Philosophy In A Time of Terror: Dialogues With Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See James Der Derian, Virtuous War: Mapping the Military-Industrial-Media-Entertainment-Network (New York: Westview Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jean Baudrillard, The Spirit of Terrorism (London: Verso, 2003), p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Felix Guattari, The Three Ecologies (London: Athlone, 2000), p. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Roland Barthes, Mythologies (London: Fontana Press, 1993), p. 92.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Charles Krauthammer, “Voices of Moral Obtuseness,” in The Iraqi War Reader, eds. Micah L. Sifry and Christopher Cerf (London: Touchstone, 2003), p. 218.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Cynthia Weber’s discussion of Moore and Liscombe in Imagining America at War (London: Routledge, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  9. For a useful introduction to “affect” see Clare Colebrook, Gilles Deleuze (London: Routledge, 2001).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Paul Virilio, Cinema and War: The Logistics of Perception (London: Verso, 1998), p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  11. For an introduction into superheroes and cultural theory see Scott Bukatman, Matters of Gravity: Special Effects and Supermen in the 20th Century (London: Duke University Press, 2003).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Friedrich Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil (London: Penguin, 1998), p. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Paul Virilio, “The Strategy of the Beyond,” in The Virilio Reader, ed. James Der Derian (Cambridge: Blackwell, 1998), p. 90.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Michel Foucault, Society Must Be Defended (London: Penguin, 2004), p. 246.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Barbara Adam, “Re-Vision: The Centrality of Time for an Ecological Social Science Perspective,” in Risk, Environment and Modernity, eds. Scott Lash, Bronislaw Szerszynski and Brian Wynne (London: Sage, 1996), p. 97.

    Google Scholar 

  16. This idea is developed in Mark J. Lacy, Security and Climate Change; International Relations and the Limits of Realism (London: Routledge, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  17. See, e.g., Michael Klare, Blood and Oil: The Dangers and Consequences of America’s Growing Petroleum Dependence (London: Penguin, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Elizabeth Dauphinee Cristina Masters

Copyright information

© 2007 Elizabeth Dauphinee and Cristina Masters

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lacy, M.J. (2007). Responsibility and Terror: Visual Culture and Violence in the Precarious Life. In: Dauphinee, E., Masters, C. (eds) The Logics of Biopower and the War on Terror. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-04379-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics