Skip to main content

Workload and Cycle Time in the Production Unit

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 785 Accesses

Abstract

Our description of the PPC problem in Chap. 1 identified the effective management of cycle times as a critical link between the planning level and the realized performance of the production units it seeks to coordinate. Most of the PPC systems prevalent in industry today approach this issue through planned lead times and maximum capacity loading, assuming that as long as the capacity loading does not exceed the agreed-upon maximum level, the production units will be able to complete work within the planned lead time with high probability. This chapter argues that reliance on exogenous planned lead times represents a significant drawback of this approach because cycle times through a production unit are, in fact, an outcome of the work release decisions made by the PPC system. Since this dependence between cycle times and work release decisions lies at the center of the problems addressed in this volume, we now discuss the relationship between a production unit’s workload and cycle time in more detail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agnew C (1976) Dynamic modeling and control of some congestion prone systems. Oper Res 24(3):400–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asmundsson JM, Rardin RL, Turkseven CH, Uzsoy R (2009) Production planning models with resources subject to congestion. Nav Res Logist 56(2):142–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aurand S, Miller P (1997) The operating curve: a method to measure and benchmark manufacturing line productivity. In: 1997 IEEE/SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop ASMC 97 Proceedings, IEEE, Cambridge, pp 391–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand JWM, Wortmann JC, Wijngaard J (1990) Production control: a structural and design oriented approach. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzacott JA, Shanthikumar JG (1993) Stochastic models of manufacturing systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry GL, Feldman RM (2000) Manufacturing systems modelling and analysis. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehteshami B, Petrakian R, Shabe P (1992) Trade-offs in cycle time management: hot lots. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf 5(2):101–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fandel G (1991) Theory of production and cost. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Godinho Filho M, Uzsoy R (2014) Assessing the impact of alternative continuous improvement programmes in a flow shop using system dynamics. Int J Prod Res 52(10):3014–3031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman S (2008) Production economics. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Häussler S, Missbauer H (2014) Empirical validation of meta-models of work centres in order release planning. Int J Prod Econ 149:102–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopp WJ, Spearman ML (2004) To pull or not to pull: what is the question? Manuf Serv Oper Manag 6(2):133–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopp WJ, Spearman ML (2008) Factory physics: foundations of manufacturing management. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacar NB, Uzsoy R (2015) Estimating clearing functions for production resources using simulation optimization. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 12(2):539–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kacar NB, Irdem DF, Uzsoy R (2012) An experimental comparison of production planning using clearing functions and iterative linear programming-simulation algorithms. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf 25(1):104–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kekre S (1984) The effect of number of items processed at a facility on manufacturing lead time. Working Paper Series. University of Rochester, Rochester

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall DG (1953) Stochastic processes occurring in the theory of queues and their analysis by the method of the imbedded Markov chain. Ann Math Stat 24(3):338–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S-C, Bobrowski PM (1995) Evaluating order release mechanisms in a job shop with sequence-dependent setup times. Prod Oper Manag 4(2):163–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingman JFC (1961) The single server queue in heavy traffic. Math Proc Camb Philos Soc 57(4):902–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liker J (2004) The Toyota way: 14 management principles from the world’s greatest manufacturer. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Little JDC (1961) A proof of the queueing formula L =ƛw. Oper Res 9:383–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Missbauer H (1997) Order release and sequence-dependent setup times. Int J Prod Econ 49:131–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Missbauer H (2009) Models of the transient behaviour of production units to optimize the aggregate material flow. Int J Prod Econ 118(2):387–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinedo M (2012) Scheduling. Theory, algorithms, and systems. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoemig AK (1999) On the corrupting influence of variability in semiconductor manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, P. A. Farrington, H. B. Nembhard, D. T. Sturrock, G. W. Evans (eds), 1999, pp. 837–842, IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  • Selçuk B, Fransoo JC, de Kok AG (2007) Work in process clearing in supply chain operations planning. IIE Trans 40(3):206–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shortle JF, Thompson JM, Gross D, Harris CM (2018) Fundamentals of queueing theory. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sugimori Y, Kusunoki K, Cho F, Uchikawa S (1977) Toyota production system and Kanban system: materialization of just-in-time and respect for human system. Int J Prod Res 15(6):553–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thürer M, Silva C, Stevenson M, Land M (2012) Improving the applicability of workload control (Wlc): the influence of sequence dependent setup times on workload controlled job shops. Int J Prod Res 50(22):6419–6430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiendahl HP (1995) Load oriented manufacturing control. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yang F, Ankenman B, Nelson BL (2006) Efficient generation of cycle time-throughput curves through simulation and metamodeling. Nav Res Logist 54(1):78–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Missbauer, H., Uzsoy, R. (2020). Workload and Cycle Time in the Production Unit. In: Production Planning with Capacitated Resources and Congestion. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0354-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics