Relay Feedback Identification of Stable Processes

  • Tao LiuEmail author
  • Furong Gao
Part of the Advances in Industrial Control book series (AIC)


Owing to the fact that a relay feedback test can generate sustained oscillations of the controlled output for closed-loop identification, model identification from the relay feedback has attracted significantly increasing attentions in the process control community, since the pioneering works of the 1980s, see Atherton (1982), Tsypkin (1984), Åström and Hägglund (1984), and Luyben (1987).


Half Period Relay Feedback Steady Oscillation Relay Switch Relay Output 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Åström KJ, Hägglund T (1984) Automatic tuning of simple regulators with specification on phase angle and amplitude margins. Automatica 20:645–651zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Åström KJ, Hägglund T (2005) Advanced PID control. ISA Society of America, Research Triangle ParkGoogle Scholar
  3. Atherton DP (1982) Oscillations in relay systems. Trans Inst Meas Control (London) 3:171–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atherton DP (2006) Relay autotuning: an overview and alternative approach. Ind Eng Chem Res 45:4075–4080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hang CC, Åström KJ, Wang QG (2002) Relay feedback auto-tuning of process controllers—a tutorial review. J Process Control 12:143–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Huang HP, Jeng JC, Luo KY (2005) Auto-tune system using single-run relay feedback test and model-based controller design. J Process Control 15:713–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kaya I, Atherton DP (2001) Parameter estimation from relay autotuning with asymmetric limit cycle data. J Process Control 11:429–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Li W, Eskinat E, Luyben WL (1991) An improved autotune identification method. Ind Eng Chem Res 30:1530–1541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Liu T, Gao F (2008) Alternative identification algorithms for obtaining a first-order stable/unstable process model from a single relay feedback test. Ind Eng Chem Res 47(4):1140–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Liu T, Gao F (2009) A generalized approach for relay identification of time delay and nonminimum phase processes. Automatica 45(4):1072–1079MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu T, Gao F, Wang YQ (2008) A systematic approach for on-line identification of second-order process model from relay feedback test. AICHE J 54(6):1560–1578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu T, Yao K, Gao F (2009) Identification and autotuning of temperature control system with application to injection molding. IEEE Transactions on Control System Technology 17(6):1282–1294Google Scholar
  13. Luyben WL (1987) Derivation of transfer functions for highly nonlinear distillation columns. Ind Eng Chem Res 26:2490–2495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Luyben WL (2001) Getting more information from relay feedback tests. Ind Eng Chem Res 40:4391–4402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ma M, Zhu X (2006) A simple auto-tuner in frequency domain. Comput Chem Eng 30:581–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Majhi S (2007a) Relay-based identification of a class of non-minimum phase SISO processes. IEEE Trans Autom Control 52:134–139MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Majhi S (2007b) Relay based identification of processes with time delay. J Process Control 17(2):93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morari M, Zafiriou E (1989) Robust process control. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffGoogle Scholar
  19. Ogunnaike BA, Ray WH (1994) Process dynamics, modeling, and control. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Panda RC (2006) Estimation of parameters of underdamped second order plus dead time processes using relay feedback. Comput Chem Eng 30:832–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Panda RC, Yu CC (2003) Analytical expressions for relay feed back responses. J Process Control 13:489–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Panda RC, Yu CC (2005) Shape factor of relay response curves and its use in autotuning. J Process Control 15:893–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ramakrishnan V, Chidambaram M (2003) Estimation of a SOPTD transfer function model using a single asymmetrical relay feedback test. Comput Chem Eng 27:1779–1784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Seborg DE, Edgar TF, Mellichamp DA (2004) Process dynamics and control, 2nd edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  25. Shen SH, Wu JS, Yu CC (1996) Use of biased-relay feedback for system identification. AICHE J 42:1174–1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shinskey FG (1996) Process control system, 4th edn. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Skogestad S (2003) Simple analytical rules for model reduction and PID controller tuning. J Process Control 13(4):291–309MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Srinivasan K, Chidambaram M (2003) Modified relay feedback method for improved system identification. Comput Chem Eng 27:727–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sung SW, Lee I-B (1997) Enhanced relay feedback method. Ind Eng Chem Res 36:5526–5530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Thyagarajan T, Yu CC (2003) Improved autotuning using the shape factor from relay feedback. Ind Eng Chem Res 42:4425–4440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tsypkin YZ (1984) Relay control system. Cambridge University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Vivek S, Chidambaram M (2005) Identification using single symmetrical relay feedback test. Comput Chem Eng 29:1625–1630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang QG, Hang CC, Zou B (1997) Low-order modelling from relay feedback. Ind Eng Chem Res 36:375–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang QG, Lee TH, Lin C (2003) Relay feedback: analysis, identification and control. Springer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yu CC (2006) Autotuning of PID controllers: a relay feedback approach, 2nd edn. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  2. 2.Hong Kong University of Science and TechnologyKowloonHong Kong SAR

Personalised recommendations