Skip to main content

Multi-objective Optimisation of a Family of Industrial Robots

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multi-objective Evolutionary Optimisation for Product Design and Manufacturing

Abstract

Product family design is a well recognised method to address the demands of mass customisation. A potential drawback of product families is that the performance of individual members are reduced because of the constraints added by the common platform, i.e., parts and components need to be shared by other family members. This chapter presents a framework where the product family design problem is stated as a multi-objective optimisation problem and where multi-objective evolutionary algorithms are applied to solve the problem. The outcome is a Pareto-optimal front that visualises the trade-off between the degree of commonality (e.g., number of shared components) and performance of individual family members. The design application is a family of industrial robots. An industrial robot is a mechatronic system that comprises a mechanical structure (i.e., a series of mechanical links), drive-train components (including motors and gears), electrical power units and control software for motion planning and control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fellini, R., Kokoloras, M., Papalambros, P., & Perez-Duarte, A. (2005). Platform selection under performance bounds in optimal design of product families. Journal of Mechanical Design, 127, 524–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nelson, S., Parkinson, M., & Papalambros, P. (2001). Multicriteria optimization in product platform design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 123, 199–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jose, A., & Tollenaere, M. (2005). Modular and platform methods for product family design: literature analysis. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 16, 371–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fujita, K., & Yoshida, H. (2004). Product variety optimization simultaneously designing module combination and module attributes. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 12(2), 105–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldberg, D. (1989). Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Deb, K. (2001). Multi-Objective Optimization using Evolutionary algorithms. New York, NY: Wiley and Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jiao, J., Zhang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2007). A generic genetic algorithm for product family design. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 18(2), 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Simpson, T., D’Souza, B. (2004). Assessing variable levels of platform commonality within a product family using a multiobjective genetic algorithm. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 12(2) pp 199–129.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Andersson, J. (2000). A Survey of Multi-objective Optimization in Engineering Design, Technical Report LiTH-IKP-R-1097, Department of Mechanical Engineering. Linköping, Sweden: Linköping University.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Steuer, R. (2001). Multiple criteria optimization: Theory, computation and application. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002). A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transaction on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2), 181–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Simon, H. (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cross, N. (2000). Engineering design methods (3rd edition). Chichester, Uk: John Wiley & sons.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pahl, G., Beitz, W. (1996). Engineering DesignA Systematic Approach. London: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Suh, N., (2001). Axiomatic DesignAdvances and Applications. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ullman, D. (1992). The Mechanical Design Process. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ullrich, K.T., Eppinger, S′.D. (2000), Product design and development (2nd Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yoshikawa, T. (1985). Manipulability of robotic mechanisms. International Journal of Robotics Research, 4(2):pp. 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Feng, X., Holmgren, B., Ölvander, J. (2009). Evaluation and optimization of industrial robot families using different kinematic measures. In proceedings of ASME Design Automation Conference. San Diego, August 30–September 2.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sicilano, B. (2001) Modeling and Control of Robot Manipulators. London: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Spong, W. Mark & Vidyasagar M. (1989), Robot Dynamics and Control. New York: John Willey & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tarkian, M., Ölvander, J., Feng, X., Petterson, M. (2009). Design automation of modular industrial robots. In proceedings of ASME Design Automation Conference. San Diego, August 30–September 2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johan Ölvander .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ölvander, J., Tarkian, M., Feng, X. (2011). Multi-objective Optimisation of a Family of Industrial Robots. In: Wang, L., Ng, A., Deb, K. (eds) Multi-objective Evolutionary Optimisation for Product Design and Manufacturing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-652-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-652-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-617-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-652-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics