Abstract
With the advancements in technology, information systems are continually increasing in size and complexity. More and more businesses are looking to these systems to provide them with greater business efficiencies and services through consolidation and integration. Businesses are also using information systems to provide governance and directions by enabling quality decision support through system information analysis and related capabilities. The ability to successfully deliver these complex information systems is creating greater challenges for businesses and system developers. As a result, businesses are turning to a variety of enterprise architectures for policies and technical choices to achieve business standardization and integration requirements of the firm’s operating model. It is particularly important for asset management, since the operational technologies utilised in asset lifecycle management can also be classed as information systems. Technology management for asset management, thus, calls for an all encompassing architecture that caters for the individual needs of operational and information technologies, as well as that of their integration. There are a number of recognised architecture frameworks available today, many of which providing similar principles and strategies. However, all of these frameworks are unique in regards to how their frameworks are used and implemented. This paper develops the case for enterprise IT architectures in asset management and provides a comparison of architecture frameworks in relation to the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. The paper focuses on three recognised architecture frameworks and provides recommendations for additional considerations of each with reference to operational and information technologies for asset lifecycle management.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Haider A (2007), Information systems based engineering asset management evaluation: operational interpretations. PhD thesis, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
Lankhorst M (2005) Enterprise architecture at work: modelling, communication and analysis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Urbaczewski L, Mrdalj S (2006) A comparison of enterprise architecture frameworks. Issues Inf Syst VII(2):18–23
Government Enterprise Architecture (GEA) framework (2007) Queensland government chief information office, version 1.1, p 4
The Open Group (2006) The togaf showcase. http://www.togaf.info/showcase/index.html, viewed 25 April 2010
The Open Group (2003) The open group architecture framework (TOGAF). Version 8.1.1 enterprise (edn). http://www.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf/#download. Viewed 19 May 2010
Zachman J (1987) A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Syst J 26(3):454–470
Sowa J, Zachman J (1992) Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architecture. IBM Syst J 31(3):590–616
United Kingdom Ministry of Defence (2008) MODAF 1.3. http://www.modaf.org.uk/default.html. Viewed 26 April 2010
United States Department of Defense (2007) DOD architecture framework, version 1.5, Definitions and guidelines, vol 1. April 2007
Kobryn C and Sibbald C (2004) Modeling DODAF Compliant Architectures, Telelogic Corporation, USA
United States Department of Defense (2003) DOD architecture framework, Version 1.0 deskbook, August 2003
Haider A (2009) Value maximisation from information technology in asset management—a cultural study. In: Proceedings of the international conference of maintenance societies (ICOMS), Sydney, Australia, 2–4 June 2009
Steenstrup K (2008) EAM and IT enabled assets: What is your equipment thinking about today? Energy & utilities summit, JW Marriott Grande Lakes, Orlando, FL, 7–10 September 2008
The Open Group (2009) The open group architecture framework. Version 9, Document number: G091, ISBN: 978-90-8753-230-7
Intervista (2003), Zachman framework for enterprise architecture, Intervista Institute, Canada
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this paper
Cite this paper
Haider, A. (2012). Enterprise Architectures for Information and Operational Technologies for Asset Management. In: Mathew, J., Ma, L., Tan, A., Weijnen, M., Lee, J. (eds) Engineering Asset Management and Infrastructure Sustainability. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-493-7_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-493-7_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-301-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-493-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)