Skip to main content

Enterprise Architectures for Information and Operational Technologies for Asset Management

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Engineering Asset Management and Infrastructure Sustainability

Abstract

With the advancements in technology, information systems are continually increasing in size and complexity. More and more businesses are looking to these systems to provide them with greater business efficiencies and services through consolidation and integration. Businesses are also using information systems to provide governance and directions by enabling quality decision support through system information analysis and related capabilities. The ability to successfully deliver these complex information systems is creating greater challenges for businesses and system developers. As a result, businesses are turning to a variety of enterprise architectures for policies and technical choices to achieve business standardization and integration requirements of the firm’s operating model. It is particularly important for asset management, since the operational technologies utilised in asset lifecycle management can also be classed as information systems. Technology management for asset management, thus, calls for an all encompassing architecture that caters for the individual needs of operational and information technologies, as well as that of their integration. There are a number of recognised architecture frameworks available today, many of which providing similar principles and strategies. However, all of these frameworks are unique in regards to how their frameworks are used and implemented. This paper develops the case for enterprise IT architectures in asset management and provides a comparison of architecture frameworks in relation to the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. The paper focuses on three recognised architecture frameworks and provides recommendations for additional considerations of each with reference to operational and information technologies for asset lifecycle management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Haider A (2007), Information systems based engineering asset management evaluation: operational interpretations. PhD thesis, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lankhorst M (2005) Enterprise architecture at work: modelling, communication and analysis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  3. Urbaczewski L, Mrdalj S (2006) A comparison of enterprise architecture frameworks. Issues Inf Syst VII(2):18–23

    Google Scholar 

  4. Government Enterprise Architecture (GEA) framework (2007) Queensland government chief information office, version 1.1, p 4

    Google Scholar 

  5. The Open Group (2006) The togaf showcase. http://www.togaf.info/showcase/index.html, viewed 25 April 2010

  6. The Open Group (2003) The open group architecture framework (TOGAF). Version 8.1.1 enterprise (edn). http://www.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf/#download. Viewed 19 May 2010

  7. Zachman J (1987) A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Syst J 26(3):454–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sowa J, Zachman J (1992) Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architecture. IBM Syst J 31(3):590–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. United Kingdom Ministry of Defence (2008) MODAF 1.3. http://www.modaf.org.uk/default.html. Viewed 26 April 2010

  10. United States Department of Defense (2007) DOD architecture framework, version 1.5, Definitions and guidelines, vol 1. April 2007

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kobryn C and Sibbald C (2004) Modeling DODAF Compliant Architectures, Telelogic Corporation, USA

    Google Scholar 

  12. United States Department of Defense (2003) DOD architecture framework, Version 1.0 deskbook, August 2003

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haider A (2009) Value maximisation from information technology in asset management—a cultural study. In: Proceedings of the international conference of maintenance societies (ICOMS), Sydney, Australia, 2–4 June 2009

    Google Scholar 

  14. Steenstrup K (2008) EAM and IT enabled assets: What is your equipment thinking about today? Energy & utilities summit, JW Marriott Grande Lakes, Orlando, FL, 7–10 September 2008

    Google Scholar 

  15. The Open Group (2009) The open group architecture framework. Version 9, Document number: G091, ISBN: 978-90-8753-230-7

    Google Scholar 

  16. Intervista (2003), Zachman framework for enterprise architecture, Intervista Institute, Canada

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abrar Haider .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Haider, A. (2012). Enterprise Architectures for Information and Operational Technologies for Asset Management. In: Mathew, J., Ma, L., Tan, A., Weijnen, M., Lee, J. (eds) Engineering Asset Management and Infrastructure Sustainability. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-493-7_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-493-7_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-301-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-493-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics