Abstract
The laparoscopic approach has been applied to a wide variety of procedures in the field of urology. Since urologists initially adopted laparoscopy from other specialties, most procedures described have been based on the traditional transperitoneal approach. Well-defined organ systems and a relative paucity of intraperitoneal fat allow the rapid identification of landmarks. Instilled gas expands the space in a predictable manner to enable optimal visualization. In contrast, it is technically difficult to develop a consistent working area in a potential retroperitoneal space occupied by areolar and fat tissues. This may explain why most initial urological laparoscopic procedures have been performed transperitoneally. Initial efforts to establish a retroperitoneal working space have been limited by inadequate distention of the retroperitoneal space, but over the last decade several techniques for retroperitoneal access have been described. We describe the increasing experience at various centers over the years, which have led to refinement of retroperitoneal laparoscopic access techniques, utilizing different access devices. Methods that take advantage of the strengths, while overcoming the perceived disadvantages of this approach have been explained.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rassweiler JJ, Seemann O, Frede T, et al. Retroperitoneoscopy: experience with 200 cases. J Urol. 1998;160:1265.
Gaur DD. Laparoscopic operative retroperitonoscopy: use of a new device. J Urol. 1992;148:1137-1139.
Gaur DD, Agarwal DK, Purohit KC, Darshane AS. Laparoscopic condom dissection: new technique of retroperitoneoscopy. J Endourol. 1994;8:149.
Shah A, Chandran H. Use of Foley’s catheter to gain access for retroperitoneoscopy. ANZ J Surg. 2004;74:1015.
Adams JB, Micali S, Moore RG, et al. Complications of extraperitoneal balloon dilation. J Endourol. 1996;10:375.
Gasman D, Droupy S, Koutani A, et al. Laroscopic adrenalectomy: the retroperitoneal approach. J Urol. 1998;159:1816-1820.
Hoznek A, Salomon L, Antiphon P, Radier C, et al. Partial nephrectomy with retroperitoneal laparoscopy. J Urol. 1999;162:1922-1926.
Salomon L, Rabil R, Soulie M, Mouly P, Hoznek A, et al. Experience with retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma. J Urol. 2001;165:1871-1874.
Gill IS. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy. Urol Clin North Am. 1998;25:343-360.
Gill IS, Grune MT, Munch LC. Access technique for retroperitoneoscopy. J Urol. 1996;156:1120.
McDougall E, Clayman RV, Fadden PT. Retroperitoneoscopy: the Washington University Medical School experience. Urology. 1994;43:446-452.
Clayman RV, McDougall EM, Kerbl K, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: transabdominal vs. retroperitoneal. J Endourol. 1993;7:S139.
Etwaru D, Raboy A, Ferzli G, et al. Extraperitoneal endoscopic gasless pelvic lymph node dissection. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1994;4:113.
Hirsch IH, Moreno JG, Lotfi MA, Gomella LG. Non-insufflative laparoscopic access. J Endourol. 1995;9:483-486.
Keeley FX, Tolley DA. Retroperitoneal laparoscopy. BJU Int. 1999;84:212-215.
El-ghoneimi A, Valla JS, Steyaert H, Aigrain Y. Laparoscopic renal surgery via a retroperitoneal approach in children. J Urol. 1998;160:1138-1141.
Micali S, Caione P, Virgili G, Capozza N, Scarfini M, Micali F. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic access in children using a direct vision technique. J Urol. 2001;165:1229-1232.
Urbanowicz W, Wieczorek M, Sulislawski J. Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy in the prone position in children (point of technique). Eur Urol. 2002;42:516-519.
Wolf JS Jr, Monk TG, McDougall EM, et al. The extraperitoneal approach and subcutaneous emphysema are associated with greater absorption of carbon dioxide during laparoscopic renal surgery. J Urol. 1995;154:959.
Gaur DD. Retroperitoneal laparoscopy: some technical modifications. Br J Urol. 1996;77:304-306.
Olsen LH, Rahwashdeh YF. Robotic pyeloplasty. In: John H, Wiklund P, eds. Robotic Urology. Germany: Springer; 2008:177-186.
Gaur DD. Retroperitoneoscopy: the balloon technique. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994;76:259-263.
Takeda M, Go H, Watanabe R, Kurumada S, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for functioning adrenal tumors: comparison with conventional transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy. J Urol. 1997;157:19-23.
Moore RG, Demaree R, Sanda MG, Kavoussi LR. Retroperitoneoscopy: effects of insufflation media on surrounding tissue during balloon rupture. J Endourol. 1995;9:67-71.
Pyo P, Chen A, Grasso M. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: surgical experience and outcomes. J Urol. 2008;180:1279-1283.
Ng CS, Gill IS, Sung GT, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic surgery is not associated with increased carbon dioxide absorption. J Urol. 1999;162:1268.
Gill IS, Das S, Munch LC. Retroperitoneoscopy: a viable alternative (abstract). J Endourol. 1994;8:S91.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ghazi, A.E., Joseph, J.V. (2011). Upper Tract Retroperitoneal Access Techniques. In: Joseph, J., Patel, H. (eds) Retroperitoneal Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-485-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-485-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-484-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-485-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)