Skip to main content

Upper Tract Retroperitoneal Access Techniques

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Retroperitoneal Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgery
  • 984 Accesses

Abstract

The laparoscopic approach has been applied to a wide variety of procedures in the field of urology. Since urologists initially adopted laparoscopy from other specialties, most procedures described have been based on the traditional transperitoneal approach. Well-defined organ systems and a relative paucity of intraperitoneal fat allow the rapid identification of landmarks. Instilled gas expands the space in a predictable manner to enable optimal visualization. In contrast, it is technically difficult to develop a consistent working area in a potential retroperitoneal space occupied by areolar and fat tissues. This may explain why most initial urological laparoscopic procedures have been performed transperitoneally. Initial efforts to establish a retroperitoneal working space have been limited by inadequate distention of the retroperitoneal space, but over the last decade several techniques for retroperitoneal access have been described. We describe the increasing experience at various centers over the years, which have led to refinement of retroperitoneal laparoscopic access techniques, utilizing different access devices. Methods that take advantage of the strengths, while overcoming the perceived disadvantages of this approach have been explained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rassweiler JJ, Seemann O, Frede T, et al. Retroperitoneoscopy: experience with 200 cases. J Urol. 1998;160:1265.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gaur DD. Laparoscopic operative retroperitonoscopy: use of a new device. J Urol. 1992;148:1137-1139.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gaur DD, Agarwal DK, Purohit KC, Darshane AS. Laparoscopic condom dissection: new technique of retroperitoneoscopy. J Endourol. 1994;8:149.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shah A, Chandran H. Use of Foley’s catheter to gain access for retroperitoneoscopy. ANZ J Surg. 2004;74:1015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Adams JB, Micali S, Moore RG, et al. Complications of extraperitoneal balloon dilation. J Endourol. 1996;10:375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gasman D, Droupy S, Koutani A, et al. Laroscopic adrenalectomy: the retroperitoneal approach. J Urol. 1998;159:1816-1820.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoznek A, Salomon L, Antiphon P, Radier C, et al. Partial nephrectomy with retroperitoneal laparoscopy. J Urol. 1999;162:1922-1926.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Salomon L, Rabil R, Soulie M, Mouly P, Hoznek A, et al. Experience with retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma. J Urol. 2001;165:1871-1874.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gill IS. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy. Urol Clin North Am. 1998;25:343-360.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gill IS, Grune MT, Munch LC. Access technique for retroperitoneoscopy. J Urol. 1996;156:1120.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McDougall E, Clayman RV, Fadden PT. Retroperitoneoscopy: the Washington University Medical School experience. Urology. 1994;43:446-452.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Clayman RV, McDougall EM, Kerbl K, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: transabdominal vs. retroperitoneal. J Endourol. 1993;7:S139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Etwaru D, Raboy A, Ferzli G, et al. Extraperitoneal endoscopic gasless pelvic lymph node dissection. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1994;4:113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hirsch IH, Moreno JG, Lotfi MA, Gomella LG. Non-insufflative laparoscopic access. J Endourol. 1995;9:483-486.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Keeley FX, Tolley DA. Retroperitoneal laparoscopy. BJU Int. 1999;84:212-215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. El-ghoneimi A, Valla JS, Steyaert H, Aigrain Y. Laparoscopic renal surgery via a retroperitoneal approach in children. J Urol. 1998;160:1138-1141.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Micali S, Caione P, Virgili G, Capozza N, Scarfini M, Micali F. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic access in children using a direct vision technique. J Urol. 2001;165:1229-1232.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Urbanowicz W, Wieczorek M, Sulislawski J. Retro­peritoneoscopic nephrectomy in the prone position in children (point of technique). Eur Urol. 2002;42:516-519.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wolf JS Jr, Monk TG, McDougall EM, et al. The extraperitoneal approach and subcutaneous emphysema are associated with greater absorption of carbon dioxide during laparoscopic renal surgery. J Urol. 1995;154:959.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gaur DD. Retroperitoneal laparoscopy: some technical modifications. Br J Urol. 1996;77:304-306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Olsen LH, Rahwashdeh YF. Robotic pyeloplasty. In: John H, Wiklund P, eds. Robotic Urology. Germany: Springer; 2008:177-186.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Gaur DD. Retroperitoneoscopy: the balloon technique. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994;76:259-263.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Takeda M, Go H, Watanabe R, Kurumada S, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for functioning adrenal tumors: comparison with conventional transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy. J Urol. 1997;157:19-23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Moore RG, Demaree R, Sanda MG, Kavoussi LR. Retroperitoneoscopy: effects of insufflation media on surrounding tissue during balloon rupture. J Endourol. 1995;9:67-71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pyo P, Chen A, Grasso M. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: surgical experience and outcomes. J Urol. 2008;180:1279-1283.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ng CS, Gill IS, Sung GT, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic surgery is not associated with increased carbon dioxide absorption. J Urol. 1999;162:1268.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gill IS, Das S, Munch LC. Retroperitoneoscopy: a viable alternative (abstract). J Endourol. 1994;8:S91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed E. Ghazi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ghazi, A.E., Joseph, J.V. (2011). Upper Tract Retroperitoneal Access Techniques. In: Joseph, J., Patel, H. (eds) Retroperitoneal Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-485-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-485-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-484-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-485-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics