Abstract
Centrifugal pumps are widely used in petrochemical industry and in some instances, the number of pumps used could easily amount to hundreds of pumps in a typical petrochemical plant. Consequently, the reliability of these pumps essentially translates into stable and reliable plant operation as the pumps performances are critical in ensuring continuous plant productivity. Reliability assessment for repairable equipment, which in this case centrifugal pumps, is highly dependent upon the assumption of the state after each repair. The post repair states can be categorized into three different states namely, ‘as good as new’, ‘as bad as old’ and the states in between. In practice, however, the usual state of equipment after repair follows the state of ‘better than old but worse than new’ which lies somewhere in between the two extremes. This paper focuses on the reliability assessment of the centrifugal pumps at a refinery plant that has been in operation for more than 10 years using a more robust process called generalized renewal process (GRP). This process has been proposed to model not only the ‘inbetween’ states but also the two extreme post repair states. A case study utilizing centrifugal pump failure data is used as a comparative appraisal of reliability assessment between GRP, perfect renewal process (PRP) and non-homogenous Poisson process (NHPP). The underlying distribution for time to first failure for these pumps is assumed to follow the two-parameter Weibull distribution and the parameters for the models are estimated using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE). The GRP solution based on the case study showed better description of the failure distribution even with limited available failure data in contrast with other assumptions as indicated by the likelihood values.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ascher, H. & Feingold, H. (1984) Repairable systems reliability: Modeling, inference, misconceptions and their causes. Marcel Dekker, New York.
Veber, B., Nagode, M. & Fajdiga, M. (2008) Generalized renewal process for repairable systems based on finite Weibull mixture. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 93, 1461-1472.
Krivtsov, V. V. (2007) Recent advances in theory and applications of stochastic point process models in reliability engineering. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 92, 549-551.
Krivtsov, V. V. (2007) Practical extensions to NHPP application in repairable system reliability analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 92, 560-562.
Yanez, M., Joglar, F. & Modarres, M. (2002) Generalized renewal process for analysis of repairable system with limited failure experience. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 77, 167-180.
Kijima, M. & Sumita, N. (1986) A useful generalization of renewal theory: counting process governed by non-negative Markovian increments. Journal Applied Probability, 23, 71-88.
Mettas, A. & Zhao, W. (2005) Modeling and analysis of repairable system with general repair. IEEE 2005 Proceedings annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium,Alexandaria, Virginia USA, January 24-27.
Krivtsov, V. (2000) Monte Carlo approach to modeling and estimation of the generalized renewal process in repairable system reliability analysis. Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University of Maryland.
Weckman, G. R., Shell, R. L. & Marvel, J. H. (2001) Modeling the reliability of repairable systems in aviation industry. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 40, 51-63.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag
About this paper
Cite this paper
Muhammad, M., Abd Majid, M., Ibrahim, N. (2010). A case study of reliability assessment for centrifugal pumps in a petrochemical plant. In: Kiritsis, D., Emmanouilidis, C., Koronios, A., Mathew, J. (eds) Engineering Asset Lifecycle Management. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-320-6_44
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-320-6_44
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-321-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-320-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)