Skip to main content

Function performance evaluation and its application for design modification based on product usage data

  • Conference paper
Book cover Engineering Asset Lifecycle Management

Abstract

In recent years, companies have been able to gather more data from their products thanks to new technologies such as product embedded information devices (PEIDs, Kiritsis et al. (2004)), advanced sensors, internet, wireless telecommunication, and so on. Using them, companies can access working products directly, monitor and handle products remotely, and transfer generated data back to appropriate company repositories wirelessly. However, the application of the newly gathered data is still primitive since it has been difficult to obtain this kind of data without the recently developed new technologies. The newly gathered data can be applicable for product improvement in that it is transformed into appropriate information and knowledge. To this end, we propose a new method to manage the newly gathered data to complete closed-loop PLM. The usage data gathered at the MOL phase is transferred to the BOL phase for design modification so as to improve the product. To do this, we define new terms regarding function performance considering the historical change of function performance. The proposed definitions are developed to be used in design modification so that they help engineers to understand components/parts working status during the usage period of a product. Based on the evaluation of components/parts working status, the critical components/parts are discriminated. For the found critical components/parts, the working status of them is examined and correlated with field data which consists of operational and environmental data. The correlation provides engineers with critical field data which has an important effect on the worse working status. Hence, the proposed method provides the transformation from usage data gathered in the MOL phase to information for design improvement in the BOL phase. To verify our method, we use a locomotive case study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bansal, D., D. J. Evans, et al. (2005) A Real-Time Predictive Maintenance System for Machine Systems - An Alternative to Expensive Motion Sensing Technology. Sensors for Industry Conference, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bucchianico, A. et al. (2004) A multi-scale approach to functional signature analysis for product end-of-life management. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 20(5), 457-467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang-Ching, L. & T. Hsien-Yu (2005) A neural network application for reliability modelling and condition-based predictive maintenance. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 25(1-2), 174-179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chin, K.-S., A. Chan, et al. (2008) Development of a fuzzy FMEA based product design system. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 36(7-8), 633-649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Delaney, K. D. & P. Phelan (2009) Design improvement using process capability data. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209(1), 619-624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Djurdjanovic, D. et al. (2003) Watchdog Agent - an infotronics-based prognostics approach for product performance degradation assessment and prediction. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 17(3-4), 109-125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Giese, H. and M. Tichy (2006) Component-based hazard analysis: Optimal designs, product lines, and onlinereconfiguration. Gdansk, Poland, Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jayaram, J. S. R. & Girish, T. (2005) Reliability prediction through degradation data modeling using a quasi-likelihood approach. Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2005 Proceedings, pp.193--199.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kiritsis, D. (2004) Ubiquitous product lifecycle management using product embedded information devices. Intelligent Maintenance System (IMS) 2004 International Conference, Arles.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, J. et al. (2006) Intelligent prognostics tools and e-maintenance. Computers in Industry, 57(6), 476-489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Osteras, T. et al. (2006) Product performance and specification in new product development. Journal of Engineering Design, 17(2), 177-192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stone, R., I. Tumer, et al. (2005) Linking product functionality to historic failures to improve failure analysis in design. Research in Engineering Design, 16(1), 96-108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tang, L. C. et al. (2004) Planning of step-stress accelerated degradation test. Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2004 Proceedings, pp.287-292.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Xiaoling, B., X. Quanzhi, et al. (2007) Equipment fault forecasting based on a two-level hierarchical model. Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zampino, E. J. (2001) Application of fault-tree analysis to troubleshooting the NASA GRC icing research tunnel. Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag

About this paper

Cite this paper

Shin, JH., Kiritsis, D., Xirouchakis, P. (2010). Function performance evaluation and its application for design modification based on product usage data. In: Kiritsis, D., Emmanouilidis, C., Koronios, A., Mathew, J. (eds) Engineering Asset Lifecycle Management. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-320-6_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-320-6_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-321-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-320-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics