Skip to main content

Fracture Detection in an MRF-Based Hierarchical Bayesian Framework

  • Chapter
  • 787 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition ((ACVPR))

Abstract

The previous chapter discussed the extraction of fracture points and fracture surfaces in the event of a major fracture where the bone fragments are well separated. In contrast, the focus of this chapter is on the detection of hairline fractures or minor fractures. Mandibular fractures are observed to possess certain distinct patterns in X-ray or CT images. In some cases, the fractures are observed to be hairline or minor in nature. By the terms hairline fracture or minor fracture we refer to those situations where the broken bone fragments are not visibly out of alignment or have incurred very little relative displacement, respectively. The presence of noise makes the detection and subsequent visualization of such types of fractures in X-ray or CT images a very challenging task. In case of a major fracture, i.e., fractures where the broken fragments are clearly displaced relative to each other, surgical intervention is almost mandatory. However, in the case of a hairline fracture or minor fracture, the decision regarding surgical intervention is less clear since the surgeon can rely on natural bone healing for fracture reduction without having to perform reconstructive surgery. In this chapter, we propose a Markov Random Field (MRF)-based hierarchical Bayesian paradigm for detection of hairline or minor fractures and generation of the reconstructed jaw (i.e., target pattern) in such cases. Here, we model the fracture as a local stochastic degradation of a hypothetical intact mandible. In the presence of noise, the detection and subsequent visualization of hairline fractures becomes a clinically challenging task. Furthermore, the decision regarding surgical intervention for this type of fracture is often unclear as a surgeon can choose to rely solely on natural bone healing without any surgical intervention. In addition to aiding in the detection and visualization of the hairline fracture, the generated target pattern depicts how a jaw with a hairline fracture would appear if allowed to heal naturally without explicit surgical intervention. The Bayesian estimation of the mode of the posterior distribution corresponds to the target pattern (i.e., reconstructed jaw), and the differences in intensity between the input data and the MAP estimate at specific pixel locations denote the occurrence and location of a hairline fracture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ogundare BO, Bonnick A, Bayley N (2003) Pattern of mandibular fractures in an urban major trauma center. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61(6):713–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB (2000) Bayesian data analysis. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li SZ (1995) Markov random field modeling in computer vision. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Geman S, Geman D (1984) Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 6(6):721–741

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhandarkar SM, Chowdhury AS, Tang Y, Yu JC, Tollner EW (2007) Computer vision guided virtual craniofacial reconstruction. Comput Med Imaging Graph 31(6):418–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Prima S, Ourselin S, Ayache N (2002) Computation of the mid-sagittal plane in 3D brain images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 21(2):122–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB (2004) Bayesian data analysis. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Berger JO (1985) Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Harris CJ, Stephens M (1988) A combined corner and edge detector. In: Proc 4th Alvey vision conference, Manchester, UK, pp 147–151

    Google Scholar 

  10. Besag J (1986) On the statistical analysis of dirty pictures. J R Stat Soc Ser B 48(3):259–302

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee SJ, Rangarajan A, Gindi G (1995) Bayesian image reconstruction in SPECT using higher order mechanical models as priors. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 14(4):669–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Choi SM, Lee JE, Kim J, Kim MH (1997) Volumetric object reconstruction using the 3-D MRF model-based segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 16(6):887–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chan AK, Zheng L (2001) An artificial intelligent algorithm for tumor detection in screening mammogram. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20(7):559–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Salli E, Aronen HJ, Savolainen S, Korvenoja A, Visa A (2001) Contextual clustering for analysis of functional MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20(5):403–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen T, Metaxas DN (2004) Markov random field models. In: Yoo TS (ed) Insight into images. AK Peters, Wellesley

    Google Scholar 

  16. Richard FJP (2005) A comparative study of Markovian and variational image-matching techniques in application to mammograms. Pattern Recognit Lett 26(12):1819–1829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Popa C, Zdunek R (2005) Penalized least-squares image reconstruction for borehole tomography. In: Proc algorithmy, Podbanske, Slovakia, pp 260–269

    Google Scholar 

  18. Martin-Fernandez M, Alberola-Lopez C (2005) An approach for contour detection of human kidneys from ultrasound images using Markov random fields and active contours. Med Image Anal 9(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Raj A, Singh G, Zabih R (2006) MRF’s for MRI’s: Bayesian reconstruction of MR images via graph cuts. In: Proc IEEE int cof on computer vision pattern recognition (CVPR), New York, NY, USA, pp 1061–1068

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chowdhury AS, Bhattacharya A, Bhandarkar SM, Datta GS, Yu JC, Figueroa R (2007) Hairline fracture detection using MRF and Gibbs sampling. In: Proc eighth IEEE int workshop on applications of computer vision (WACV), Austin, TX, USA, p 56

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Giannoudis PV, Dinopoulos H (2005) Current concepts of the inflammatory response after major trauma: an update. Injury 36(1):229–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vodovotz Y et al. (2006) In silico models of acute inflammation in animals. Shock 26(3):235–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Molina R (1994) On the hierarchical Bayesian approach to image restoration: Applications to astronomical images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 16(11):1122–1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ananda S. Chowdhury .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chowdhury, A.S., Bhandarkar, S.M. (2011). Fracture Detection in an MRF-Based Hierarchical Bayesian Framework. In: Computer Vision-Guided Virtual Craniofacial Surgery. Advances in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-296-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-296-4_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-295-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-296-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics