Abstract
Facial transplantation is a complex and innovative technique still in its infancy, thus it is critical that the informed consent process has integrity. The patient population is vulnerable due to their desire for esthetic change amid a society that places much value on personal appearance. The technology of transplant, itself, requires an alliance between the doctor and patient due to matters of behavioral and medication compliance. This said, there is much for the patient to know and understand about themselves and the technique, in a setting of many technological unknowns. This chapter describes key elements of the informed consent process for facial transplantation so as to optimize the aim of information transmission, comprehension, and voluntariness.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
US Code of Federal Regulations Title 45 Chapter 46 (Protection of Human Subjects), Section 116 (General Requirements for Informed Consent). http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm#46.116. Accessed April 5, 2010.
Greenwald L. Heroes with a Thousand Faces: True Stories of People with Facial Deformities & Their Quest for Acceptance. Cleveland: Cleveland Clinic Press; 2007:252-253.
Ye M. Psychological morbidity in patients with facial and neck burns. Burns. 1998;24:646-648.
Balakrishnan C, Hashim M, Gao D. The effect of partial-thickness facial burns on social functioning. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1999;20:224-225.
Coull F. Personal story offers insight into living with facial disfigurement. J Wound Care. 2003;12:254-258.
Rumsey N, Clarke A, White P, Wyn-Williams M, Garlick W. Altered body image: appearance-related concerns of people with visible disfigurement. J Adv Nurs. 2004;48:443-453.
Bradbury E. Understanding the problems. In: Lansdown R, Rumsey N, Bradbury E, Carr T, Partridge J, eds. Visibly Different: Coping with Disfigurement. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1997:180-193.
Mowlavi A, Bass MJ, Khurshid KA, Milner S, Zook EG. Psychological sequelae of failed scalp replantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:1573-1579.
Edgell SE, McCabe SJ, Breidenbach WC, Neace WP, LaJoie AS, Abell TD. Different reference frames can lead to different hand transplantation decisions by patients and physicians. J Hand Surg Am. 2001;26:196-200. Erratum in: J Hand Surg [Am]. 2001;26:565.
Kanitakis J, Jullien D, Petruzzo P, et al. Clinicopathologic features of graft rejection of the first human hand allograft. Transplantation. 2003;76:688-693.
Lanzetta M, Petruzzo P, Vitale G, et al. Human hand transplantation: what have we learned? Transplant Proc. 2004;36:664-668.
Baumeister S, Kleist C, Döhler B, Bickert B, Germann G, Opelz G. Risks of allogeneic hand transplantation. Microsurgery. 2004;24:98-103.
Tobin GR, Breidenbach WC, Klapheke MM, Bentley FR, Pidwell DJ, Simmons PD. Ethical considerations in the early composite tissue allograft experience: a review of the Louisville ethics program. Transplant Proc. 2005;37:1392-1395.
Siegler M. Ethical issues in innovative surgery: should we attempt a cadaveric hand transplantation in a human subject? Transplant Proc. 1998;30:2779-2782.
Clark PA. Face transplantation: part II – an ethical perspective. Med Sci Monit. 2005;11:RA41-RA47.
Wiggins OP. On the ethics of facial transplantation research. Am J Bioeth. 2004;4:1-12.
Royal College of Surgeons of England. Facial Transplantation: Working Party Report, 1st ed. November 2003.
Royal College of Surgeons of England. Facial Transplantation: Working Party Report, 2nd ed. November 2006.
National Consultative Ethics Committee for the Health and Life Sciences. Opinion No. 82: Composite Tissue Allotransplantation (CTA) of the Face (Full or Partial Face Transplant). February 6, 2004.
American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Facial Transplantation-ASRM/ASPS Guiding Principles. www.microsurg.org/ftGuidelines_OnlinePDF.pdf. Accessed 13.01.11.
Pomahac B, Aflaki P, Nelson C, Balas B. Evaluation of appearance transfer and persistence in central face transplantation: a computer simulation analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:733-738.
Aflaki P, Nelson C, Balas B, Pomahac B. Simulated central face transplantation: age consideration in matching donors and recipients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:e283-e285.
Barker JH, Brown CS, Cunningham M, et al. Ethical considerations in human facial tissue allotransplantation. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;60:103-109.
Rumsey N. Psychological aspects of face transplantation: read the small print carefully. Am J Bioeth. 2004;4:22-25.
Basch SH. The intrapsychic integration of a new organ: a clinical study of kidney transplantation. Psychoanal Q. 1973;42:364-384.
Castelnuovo-Tedesco P. Organ transplant, body image, psychosis. Psychoanal Q. 1973;42:349-363.
Barker JH, Furr LA, McGuire S, et al. Patient expectations in facial transplantation. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;61:68-72.
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 (P.L.104-191). 45 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 160 and 164.
Cupples SA, Steslow B. Use of behavioral contingency contracting with heart transplant candidates. Prog Transplant. 2001;11:137-144.
Bramstedt KA. Living donor transplantation between twins: guidance for donor advocate teams. Clin Transplant. 2007;21:144-147.
Renshaw A, Clarke A, Diver AJ, Ashcroft RE, Butler PE. Informed consent for facial transplantation. Transpl Int. 2006;19:861-867.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bramstedt, K.A. (2011). Informed Consent for Facial Transplantation. In: Siemionow, M. (eds) The Know-How of Face Transplantation. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-253-7_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-253-7_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-252-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-253-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)