Skip to main content

Gas Sorption Measurement Techniques

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Hydrogen Storage Materials

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

Abstract

In this chapter we introduce the main gas sorption techniques applied to the characterisation of the hydrogen sorption properties of potential hydrogen storage materials. We begin with volumetric techniques, with a focus on the commonly used manometric (Sieverts’) method, but also cover some of the alternative approaches, such as the flowing and differential volumetric methods. We then describe the gravimetric technique, including a discussion of vacuum microbalances and the requirements for high pressure hydrogen operation. Thermal desorption techniques are then covered, including Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) and Thermal Desorption Spectroscopy (TDS), in which the temperature-programmed desorption of hydrogen can be detected in a number of ways, including quadrupole mass spectrometry. The chapter concludes with a practical comparison of the different gas sorption measurement techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There are some variations and inconsistencies in the terminology used for the measurements described in this section. The measurement type used often in metal hydride research is essentially the same as the method used by adsorption equipment for the determination of the BET surface area and pore size distribution of porous solids. It is widely called the volumetric technique, although the measurement parameter that determines the sorbed quantity is principally the pressure and therefore it should be termed manometry [1] or the manometric technique or method [4, 9]. The equipment is also sometimes referred to as PCT apparatus, because the measured data determine the Pressure–Composition–Temperature (PCT) properties of a metal hydride system. This is a particularly imprecise term because these properties can be determined in a number of ways. Here we use the term volumetric to encompass all techniques that use the measurement of the volume of hydrogen, as opposed to a change in the sample mass, to determine hydrogen uptake because this is common terminology, but acknowledge that for manometric apparatus this is, strictly speaking, incorrect.

  2. 2.

    The high vacuum regime can be defined as the range ~10−3 to 10−8 mbar (10−1 to 10−6 Pa). Either side of this regime is ultra-high vacuum in the range 10−8 to 10−12 mbar (10−6 to 10−10 Pa), medium vacuum in the range 1 to 10−3 mbar (102 to 10−1 Pa) and low vacuum in the range atmospheric pressure to 1 mbar (105 to 102 Pa) [11].

  3. 3.

    Providing the empty cell volume is known this is also a helium pycnometry measurement of the sample volume and hence its density. For adsorption measurement, this defines the position of the Gibbs dividing surface.

  4. 4.

    Empty in the sense of unloaded, unhydrogenated, or at the hydrogen loading required at the start of the measurement, including any trapped residual hydrogen.

  5. 5.

    The (m s /ρ s ) term therefore simply represents the volume occupied by the sample.

  6. 6.

    This is also the method of determining technical equilibrium described by Keller and Staudt [4].

  7. 7.

    A greater uptake and higher pressure allows a smaller sample size.

  8. 8.

    Careful calculations would be required before this was attempted because the resultant pressure rise due to an increase from 77 to 300 K, for example, is nearly fourfold ignoring any desorption from the sample. However, this might only limit the upper pressure of the measurement because 2–3 MPa would seem to be feasible, whereas 20 MPa would not because a 77 K measurement could potentially result in pressures approaching a kbar (100 MPa).

References

  1. Rouquerol F, Rouquerol J, Sing K (1999) Adsorption by powders and porous solids: principles, methodology and applications. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lowell S, Shields JE, Thomas MA, Thommes M (2004) Characterization of porous solids and powders: surface area, pore size and density. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yang RT (1997) Gas separation by adsorption processes. Imperial College Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Keller J, Staudt R (2005) Gas adsorption equilibria: experimental methods and adsorptive isotherms. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brown ME (2001) Introduction to thermal analysis: techniques and applications, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bhatia S, Beltramini I, Do DD (1990) Temperature-programmed analysis and its applications in catalytic systems. Catal Today 7:309–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Redhead PA (1962) Thermal desorption of gases. Vacuum 12(4):203–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carter G (1962) Thermal resolution of desorption energy spectra. Vacuum 12(5):245–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Blach TP, Gray EM (2007) Sieverts apparatus and methodology for accurate determination of hydrogen uptake by light-atom hosts. J Alloy Compd 446–447:692–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Broom DP (2008) Hydrogen sorption measurements on potential storage materials: experimental methods and measurement accuracy. EUR 23242 EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chambers A, Fitch RK, Halliday BS (1998) Basic vacuum technology, 2nd edn. Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Japanese Industrial Standards Committee (2007) Method for measurement of pressure–composition–temperature (PCT) relations of hydrogen absorbing alloys. JIS H 7201:2007 (E)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gray EM (2008) Reliably measuring hydrogen uptake in storage materials. In: Walker G (ed) Solid-state hydrogen storage: materials and chemistry. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  14. Poirier E, Chahine R, Tessier A, Bose TK (2005) Gravimetric and volumetric approaches adapted for hydrogen sorption measurements with in situ conditioning on small sorbent samples. Rev Sci Instrum 76:055101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Blackman JM, Patrick JW, Snape CE (2006) An accurate volumetric differential pressure method for the determination of hydrogen storage capacity at high pressures in carbon materials. Carbon 44:918–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Browning DJ, Gerrard ML, Lakeman JB, Mellor IM, Mortimer RJ, Turpin MC (2002) Studies into the storage of hydrogen in carbon nanofibers: proposal of a possible reaction mechanism. Nano Lett 2(3):201–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zielinski JM, Coe CG, Nickel RJ, Romeo AM, Cooper AC, Pez GP (2007) High pressure sorption isotherms via differential pressure measurements. Adsorption 13:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Goodell PD, Sandrock GD, Huston EL (1980) Kinetic and dynamic aspects of rechargeable metal hydrides. J Less Common Met 73:135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pieters WJM, Gates WE (1984) Method and apparatus for determining the amount of gas adsorbed or desorbed from a solid. United States Patent 4489593

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang X-L, Suda S (1990) A dehydriding kinetic study of LaNi4.7Al0.3 hydride by a step-wise method. J Less Common Met 159:83–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Japanese Industrial Standards Committee (2007) Method for measurement of hydrogen absorption/desorption reaction rate of hydrogen absorbing alloys. JIS H 7202:2007 (E)

    Google Scholar 

  22. McBain JW, Bakr AM (1926) A new sorption balance. J Am Chem Soc 48(3):690–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lutz HM, Schmitt R, Steffens F (1978) A high-temperature, high-pressure microbalance for the determination of the hydrogen sorption characteristics of metal hydrides. Thermochim Acta 24:369–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Feenstra R, Griessen R, de Groot DG (1986) Hydrogen induced lattice expansion and effective H–H interaction in single phase PdH c . J Phys F Met Phys 16:1933–1952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Benham MJ, Ross DK (1989) Experimental determination of absorption–desorption isotherms by computer-controlled gravimetric analysis. Z Phys Chem NF 163:S25–S32

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bououdina M, Soubeyroux JL, Juen P, Mouget C, Argoud R, Fruchart D (1995) An apparatus for gravimetric analysis: its application to metal-hydrogen systems. J Alloy Compd 231:422–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Agarwal RK, Schwarz JA (1988) Analysis of high pressure adsorption of gases on activated carbon by potential theory. Carbon 26(6):873–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chagger HK, Ndaji FE, Sykes ML, Thomas KM (1995) Kinetics of adsorption and diffusional characteristics of carbon molecular sieves. Carbon 33(10):1405–1411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. O’koye IP, Benham M, Thomas KM (1997) Adsorption of gases and vapors on carbon molecular sieves. Langmuir 13:4054–4059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gast T, Robens E (1996) Modern vacuumbalances. J Therm Anal 47:605–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kiefer S, Robens E (2008) Some intriguing items in the history of volumetric and gravimetric adsorption measurements. J Therm Anal Calorim 94:613–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Trexler MD, Sanders TH, Singh PM (2006) Automation of a McBain-Bakr-type thermogravimetric analyzer using a digital image correlation technique. Rev Sci Instrum 77:025103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Robens E, Gast T, Hoinkis E, Müller U (1989) Surface area, density and porosity measurements using the magnetic suspension balance. Fresenius Z Anal Chem 333:428–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Frazier GA, Glosser R (1979) Phase diagrams of thin films of the palladium hydrogen system using a quartz crystal thickness monitor. J Phys D 12:L113–L115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Frazier GA, Glosser R (1980) Characterization of thin films of the palladium hydrogen system. J Less Common Met 74:89–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kulchytskyy I, Kocanda MG, Xu T (2007) Direct mass determination of hydrogen uptake using a quartz crystal microbalance. Appl Phys Lett 91:113507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Schefer RW, Houf WG, San Marchi C, Chernicoff WP, Englom L (2006) Characterization of leaks from compressed hydrogen dispensing systems and related components. Int J Hydrogen Energy 31:1247–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. San Marchi C, Somerday BP, Robinson SL (2007) Permeability, solubility and diffusivity of hydrogen isotopes in stainless steels at high gas pressures. Int J Hydrogen Energy 32:100–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Birnbaum HK (2001) Hydrogen embrittlement. In: Buschow KHJ, Cahn RW, Flemings MC, Ilschner B, Kramer EJ, Mahajan S, Veyssière P (eds) Encyclopedia of materials: science and technology. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zielinski JM, McKeon P, Kimak MF (2007) A simple technique for the measurement of H2 sorption capacities. Ind Eng Chem Res 46:329–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hatton PJ, Southward BWL (2003) Optimisation of the connection between TA-MS systems together with improved data interpretation for TA-MS applications. J Therm Anal Calorim 72:83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Stern A, Kreitzman SR, Resnik A, Shaltiel D, Zevin V (1981) Thermal desorption spectra of hydrogen from the bulk: ZrV2Hx. Solid State Commun 40(8):837–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Castro FJ, Meyer G (2000) A novel thermal desorption spectroscopy apparatus. Rev Sci Instrum 71(5):2131–2133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. von Zeppelin F, Haluška M, Hirscher M (2003) Thermal desorption spectroscopy as a quantitative tool to determine the hydrogen content in solids. Thermochim Acta 404:251–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Dillon AC, Jones KM, Bekkedahl TA, Kiang CH, Bethune DS, Heben MJ (1997) Storage of hydrogen in single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nature 386:377–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Panella B, Hirscher M, Ludescher B (2007) Low-temperature thermal-desorption mass spectroscopy applied to investigate the hydrogen adsorption on porous materials. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 103(1–3):230–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zlotea C, Sahlberg M, Özbilen S, Moretto P, Andersson Y (2008) Hydrogen desorption studies of the Mg24Y5–H system: formation of Mg tubes, kinetics and cycling effects. Acta Mater 56(11):2421–2428

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darren P. Broom .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Broom, D.P. (2011). Gas Sorption Measurement Techniques. In: Hydrogen Storage Materials. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-221-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-221-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-220-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-221-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics