Advertisement

A Study on Color Emotion for Plastic Eyewear

  • Ching-Chien Liang
  • Kuohsiang ChenEmail author
  • Chun-Heng Ho
Conference paper
Part of the Advanced Concurrent Engineering book series (ACENG)

Abstract

This study explored consumers’ Kansei evaluation of the color of plastic eyewear. The procedure included: (1) collecting over 400 plastic eyewear samples on Taiwan’s market, (2) collecting emotional adjectives for describing the color of eyewear frames, (3) selecting one representative eyewear frame and 10 variation colors by four design experts, (4) selecting 8 representative emotional adjectives with Kawakita Jiro method, (5) conducting experiment with Semantic Differential method to record the subjective evaluation of the eyewear samples, (6) analyzing data collected with multi-variable analysis and principal component analysis. The results indicated that: the Red frame had the highest scores on “avant-garde”, “strong” as well as “unique”; the Pink frame exhibited “soft” feel; the Yellow frame showed “young” most; the Green frame demonstrated “vulgar” impression; the Indigo frame displayed the most “popular” and “rational”; the Black frame presented “traditional”, “stable”, “noble” and “formal”; while the Purple frame represented the most “sensational”. On the whole, the color of plastic eyewear had significant emotional appeal for peoples. Different color collocation of eyewear will change the overall emotional reflection. The results of the study may serve as a reference of color plan for eyewear designer as well as end users.

Keywords

Kansei engineering Kawakita Jiro method Color emotion Cognitive psychology Plastic eyewear 

References

  1. 1.
    Chen K. Style recognition and description. J Des. 1997;2(2):123–43.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Elliot AJ, Maier MA. Color and psychological functioning. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2007;16(5):250–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eyeglasses. In: Encyclopædia Britannica online. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/199370/eyeglasses>. Accessed on 15th Dec 2009.
  4. 4.
    Kao SL. A study of the effect of changing size and shape of colored area on cognition in color combination. National Yunlin University of Science and Technology; 2003. pp. 140–8.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kobayashi S. Color marketing strategy. Taipei: Future Career Management Consultants Inc.; 1986. pp. 15–37.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Neisser U. Cognitive psychology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1967. pp. 3–5.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Osgood CE. Semantic differential technique in the comparative study of cultures, part 2. Am Anthropol. 1964; 66(3):171–200.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oyama T. Color psychology. Taipei: Muchun Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schunk DH, Hanson AR. Peer models: influence on children’s self-efficacy and achievement behavior. J Educ Psychol. 1985;77:313–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shih WM. The study of the corresponding relationship between forms and images of eye-glasses. Taiwan: National Chiao Tung University; 1995.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tweney RD. A framework for the cognitive psychology of science. Psychology of science: contributions to metascience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989. pp. 342–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Valdez P, Mehrabian A. Effects of color on emotions. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1994; 123(4): 394–409.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Valentine CW. An introduction to experimental psychology of beauty. London: TC & EC Jack. London; 1919. pp. 28–31.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ching-Chien Liang
    • 1
  • Kuohsiang Chen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Chun-Heng Ho
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Industrial DesignNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan

Personalised recommendations