Skip to main content

Proof: A Many-Splendored Thing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 3064 Accesses

Abstract

In a 1993 article, Jaffe and Quinn, concerned that “today in certain areas there is again a trend toward basing mathematics on intuitive reasoning without proof” (Bull Am Math Soc 29:1–13, 1993), have suggested a framework for dealing with the issue which includes attaching labels to “speculative and intuitive” work. The article has engendered a fascinating debate within the mathematical community about the nature and function of proof in mathematics and, inevitably, about the nature of the mathematical enterprise, for it is sometimes (often?) difficult to isolate “proving” from the general fabric of doing mathematics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. A. Abdulle and G. Wanner, 200 years of least squares method, Elemente der Mathematik 57:2 (2002) 45–60.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. L. V. Ahlfors, Development of the theory of conformal mapping and Riemann surfaces through a century, Annals of Math. Studies 30 (1953) 3–13.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. D. Alexander, Dirty math, MAA Focus (March 2002) 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. S. Alexander, Gaston Darboux and the history of complex dynamics, Hist. Math. 22 (1995) 179–185.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. G. E. Andrews, The death of proof? Semi-rigorous mathematics? You’ve got to be kidding!, Math. Intelligencer 16:4 (1994) 16–18.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. K. Appel and W. Haken, The four-color problem. In Mathematics Today, ed. by L. Steen, Springer-Verlag, 1978, pp.151–180.

    Google Scholar 

  7. V. I. Arnold, Will mathematics survive? Report on the Zurich Congress, Math. Intelligencer 17:3 (1995) 6–10.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Aschbacher, The status of the classification of the finite simple groups, Notices of the Amer. Math. Soc. 51 (2004) 736–740.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Atiyah et al., Responses to ‘Theoretical mathematics: Toward a cultural synthesis of mathematics and theoretical physics,’ by A. Jaffe and F. Quinn, Bulletinof the Amer. Math. Soc. 30 (1994) 178–211.

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Babai, Probably true theorems, cry wolf?, Noticesof the Amer. Math. Soc. 41 (1994) 453–454.

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Babai, Transparent proofs, MAAFocus 12:3 (1992) 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. J. Barbeau and P. J. Leah, Euler’s 1760 paper on divergent series, Hist. Math. 3 (1976) 141–160.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. B. E. Blank, Book Review: The Universal Computer: The Road from Leibniz to Turing, by M. Davis, Norton, 2000. In Notices of the Amer. Math. Soc. 48 (2001) 498–501.

    Google Scholar 

  14. U. Bottazzini and R. Tazzioli, Naturalphilosophie and its role in Riemann’s mathematics, Rev. d’Hist. Math. 1 (1995) 3–38.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. U. Bottazzini, The Higher Calculus: A History of Real and Complex Analysis from Euler to Weierstrass, Springer-Verlag, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. B. Boyer, Analysis: Notes on the evolution of a subject and a name, Math. Teacher 47 (1954) 450–462.

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. J. Chaitin, Thoughts on the Riemann Hypothesis, Math. Intelligencer 26:1 (2004) 4–7.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. C. T. Chong and Y. K. Leong, An interview with Jean-Pierre Serre, Math. Intelligencer 8:4 (1986) 8–13.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. B. Cipra, At math meetings, Enormous Theorem eclipses Fermat, Science 267 (10 Febr. 1995) 794–795.

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. Cipra, New computer insights from ‘transparent’ proofs. In What’s Happening in the Mathematical Sciences, vol. 1, Amer. Math. Society, 1993, pp. 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Dauben, Conceptual revolutions and the history of mathematics: two studies in the growth of knowledge. In Revolutions in Mathematics, ed. by D. Gillies, Oxford Univ. Press, 1992, pp. 49–82.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. W. Dawson, The Life and Work of Kurt Gödel, A K Peters, 1997. (See especially the essay titled Logical Dilemmas.)

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. A. De Millo, R. J. Lipton, and A. J. Perlis, Social processes and proofs of theorems and programs, Math. Intelligencer 3:1 (1980) 31–40.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. J. Dhombres and J. – B. Robert, Book Review: Joseph Fourier, 1768–1830: Créateur de la Physique-Mathématique, Berlin, 1998. In Math. Intelligencer 25:4 (2003) 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Dieudonné, Mathematics—the Music of Reason, Springer-Verlag, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. Dieudonné, The beginnings of Italian algebraic geometry. In Studies in the History of Mathematics, ed. by E. R. Phillips, Math. Assoc. of Amer., 1987, pp. 278–299.

    Google Scholar 

  27. C. H. Edwards, The Historical Development of the Calculus, Springer-Verlag, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  28. H. M. Edwards, Mathematical ideas, ideals, and ideology, Math. Intelligencer 14:2 (1992) 6–19.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. D. Epstein and S. Levy, Experimentation and proof in mathematics, Noticesof the Amer. Math. Soc. 42 (1995) 670–674.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. D. Gorenstein, The Enormous Theorem, Scientific Amer. (Dec. 1985) 104–115.

    Google Scholar 

  31. I. Grattan-Guinness, The Development of the Foundations of Mathematical Analysis from Euler to Riemann, MIT Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. Gray, Weierstrass, Luzin, and intuition, Amer. Math. Monthly 108 (2001) 865–870.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. B. Grünbaum and G. C. Shephard, A new look at Euler’s theorem for polyhedra, Amer. Math. Monthly 101 (1994) 109–128.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. T. L. Hankins, Sir William Rowan Hamilton, The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1980.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. H. Hellman, Great Feuds in Mathematics, Wiley, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  36. J. Horgan, The death of proof, Scientific Amer. 269 (Oct. 1993) 92–103.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. A. Jackson, Comme appelé du néant—as if summoned from the void: the life of Alexandre Grothendieck, Notices of the Amer. Math. Soc. 51 (2004) 1038–1055.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. A. Jaffe and F. Quinn, ‘Theoretical mathematics’: Toward a cultural synthesis of mathematics and theoretical physics, Bulletinof the Amer. Math. Soc. 29 (1993) 1–13.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. D. M. Jesseph, Squaring the Circle. The War between Hobbes and Wallis, Univ. of Chicago Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  40. V. J. Katz, A History of Mathematics: An Introduction, 3rd ed., Addison-Wesley, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  41. G. Kampis, L. Kvasz and M. Stöltzner (eds.), Appraising Lakatos: Mathematics, Methodology and the Man, Kluwer, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  42. M. Kline, Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times, Oxford Univ. Press, 1972.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. W. Knorr, Construction as existence proof in ancient geometry, Ancient Philosophy 3 (1983) 125–148.

    Google Scholar 

  44. G. Kolata, Mathematical proofs: the genesis of reasonable doubt, Science 192 (June 1976) 989–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. S. G. Kranz, The immortality of proof, Noticesof the Amer. Math. Soc. 41 (1994) 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  46. I. Lakatos, Proofs and Refutations, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1976.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. C. W. H. Lam, How reliable is a computer-based proof?, Math. Intelligencer 12:1 (1990) 8–12.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  48. J. Lambek, If Hamilton had prevailed: quaternions in physics, Math. Intelligencer 17:4 (1995) 7–15.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  49. S. Lang, Mordell’s review, Siegel’s letter to Mordell, diophantine geometry, and 20th century mathematics, Noticesof the Amer. Math. Soc. 42 (1995) 339–350.

    Google Scholar 

  50. R. E. Langer, Fourier series: the genesis and evolution of a theory, Amer. Math. Monthly 54S (1947) 1–86.

    Google Scholar 

  51. D. Laugwitz, Bernhard Riemann, 1826–1866, Birkhäuser, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Y. I. Manin, Truth, rigour, and common sense. In Truth in Mathematics, ed. by H. G. Dales and G. Oliveri, Oxford Univ. Press, 1998, pp. 147–159.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Y. I. Manin, How convincing is a proof?, Math. Intelligencer 2:1 (1979) 17–18.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  54. A. F. Monna, Hermann Hankel, Niew. Arch. voor Wisk. 21 (1973) 64–87.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  55. G. H. Moore, At cross-purposes: The Gödel-Zermelo letters, Bulletin Can. Soc. Hist. Phil. Math. 27 (Nov. 2000) 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  56. G. H. Moore, Zermelo’s Axiom of Choice: Its Origins, Development, and Influence, Springer-Verlag, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  57. L. J. Mordell, Book review: Diophantine geometry, by S. Lang, Bulletinof the Amer. Math. Soc. 70 (1964) 491–498.

    Google Scholar 

  58. E. Neuenschwander, Studies in the history of complex function theory II: Interactions among the French School, Riemann, and Weierstrass, Bulletinof the Amer. Math. Soc. 5 (1981) 87–105.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  59. J. Paradis, J. Pla, and P. Viader, Fermat and the quadrature of the folium of Descartes, Amer. Math. Monthly 111 (2004) 216–229.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  60. G. Polya, Induction and Analogy in Mathematics, Princeton Univ. Press, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  61. M. O. Rabin, Probabilistic algorithms. In Algorithms and Complexity: New Directions and Recent Results, ed. by J. F. Traub, Academic Press, 1976, pp. 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  62. J. R. Ravetz, Vibrating strings and arbitrary functions. In The Logic of Personal Knowledge: Essays Presented to M. Polanyi on his Seventieth Birthday, The Free Press, 1961, pp. 71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  63. B. A. Rosenfeld, A History of Non-Euclidean Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1988. (Translated from the Russian by A. Shenitzer.)

    Google Scholar 

  64. G.-C. Rota, The concept of mathematical truth. In Essays on Humanistic Mathematics, ed. by A. M. White, Math. Assoc. of Amer., 1993, pp. 91–96.

    Google Scholar 

  65. D. E. Rowe, On projecting the future and assessing the past—the 1946 Princeton bicentennial conference, Math. Intelligencer 25:4 (2003) 8–15.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  66. D. E. Rowe, Episodes in the Berlin-Göttingen rivalry, 1870–1930, Math. Intelligencer 22:1 (2000) 60–69.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  67. A. Shenitzer, The Cinderella career of projective geometry, Math. Intelligencer 13:2 (1991) 50–55.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  68. S. Smale, Algebra and complexity theory, Bulletin of the Amer. Math. Soc. 4 (1981) 1–36.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  69. J. Spencer, Short theorems with long proofs, Amer. Math. Monthly 90 (1983) 365–366.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  70. M. Stöltzner, What Lakatos could teach the mathematical physicists. In Appraising Lakatos: Mathematics, Methodology and the Man, ed. by G. Kampis, L. Kvasz and M. Stöltzner, Kluwer, 2002, pp. 157–187.

    Google Scholar 

  71. D. J. Struik, A Concise History of Mathematics, 4th ed., Dover, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  72. W. P. Thurston, On proof and progress in mathematics, Bulletinof the Amer. Math. Soc. 30 (1994) 161–177.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  73. C. Truesdell, The rational mechanics of flexible or elastic bodies, 1638–1788. In L. Euler, Opera, Ser. 2, Vol. 11, 1960, Section 2.

    Google Scholar 

  74. K. Volkert, Zur Differentzierbarkeit stetiger Funktionen—Ampère’s Beweis und seine Folgen, Arch. Hist. Exact Sc. 40 (1989) 37–112.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  75. K. Volkert, Die Geschichte der pathologischen Funktionen—Ein Beitrag zur Enstehung der mathematischen Methologie, Arch. Hist. Exact Sc. 37 (1987) 193–232.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  76. J. Von Neumann, The role of mathematics in the sciences and society, Collected Works, Vol. 4, ed. by A.H. Taub, Macmillan, 1963, pp. 477–490.

    Google Scholar 

  77. R. Westfall, Never at Rest, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  78. H. Weyl, Axiomatic versus constructive procedures in mathematics, Math. Intelligencer 7:4 (1985) 10–17, 38.

    Google Scholar 

  79. H. Weyl, Mathematics and logic, Amer. Math. Monthly 53 (1946) 2–13.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  80. O. Zariski, The fundamental ideas of abstract algebraic geometry. In Proceedings of the Intern. Congr. of Mathematicians, 1950, Vol. II, Amer. Math. Society, 1952, pp. 77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  81. D. Zeilberger, Theorems for a price: tomorrow’s semi-rigorous mathematical culture, Noticesof the Amer. Math. Soc. 40 (1993) 978–981.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Israel Kleiner .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kleiner, I. (2012). Proof: A Many-Splendored Thing. In: Excursions in the History of Mathematics. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-8268-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics