Abstract
In a 1993 article, Jaffe and Quinn, concerned that “today in certain areas there is again a trend toward basing mathematics on intuitive reasoning without proof” (Bull Am Math Soc 29:1–13, 1993), have suggested a framework for dealing with the issue which includes attaching labels to “speculative and intuitive” work. The article has engendered a fascinating debate within the mathematical community about the nature and function of proof in mathematics and, inevitably, about the nature of the mathematical enterprise, for it is sometimes (often?) difficult to isolate “proving” from the general fabric of doing mathematics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
A. Abdulle and G. Wanner, 200 years of least squares method, Elemente der Mathematik 57:2 (2002) 45–60.
L. V. Ahlfors, Development of the theory of conformal mapping and Riemann surfaces through a century, Annals of Math. Studies 30 (1953) 3–13.
D. Alexander, Dirty math, MAA Focus (March 2002) 6–7.
D. S. Alexander, Gaston Darboux and the history of complex dynamics, Hist. Math. 22 (1995) 179–185.
G. E. Andrews, The death of proof? Semi-rigorous mathematics? You’ve got to be kidding!, Math. Intelligencer 16:4 (1994) 16–18.
K. Appel and W. Haken, The four-color problem. In Mathematics Today, ed. by L. Steen, Springer-Verlag, 1978, pp.151–180.
V. I. Arnold, Will mathematics survive? Report on the Zurich Congress, Math. Intelligencer 17:3 (1995) 6–10.
M. Aschbacher, The status of the classification of the finite simple groups, Notices of the Amer. Math. Soc. 51 (2004) 736–740.
M. Atiyah et al., Responses to ‘Theoretical mathematics: Toward a cultural synthesis of mathematics and theoretical physics,’ by A. Jaffe and F. Quinn, Bulletinof the Amer. Math. Soc. 30 (1994) 178–211.
L. Babai, Probably true theorems, cry wolf?, Noticesof the Amer. Math. Soc. 41 (1994) 453–454.
L. Babai, Transparent proofs, MAAFocus 12:3 (1992) 1–2.
E. J. Barbeau and P. J. Leah, Euler’s 1760 paper on divergent series, Hist. Math. 3 (1976) 141–160.
B. E. Blank, Book Review: The Universal Computer: The Road from Leibniz to Turing, by M. Davis, Norton, 2000. In Notices of the Amer. Math. Soc. 48 (2001) 498–501.
U. Bottazzini and R. Tazzioli, Naturalphilosophie and its role in Riemann’s mathematics, Rev. d’Hist. Math. 1 (1995) 3–38.
U. Bottazzini, The Higher Calculus: A History of Real and Complex Analysis from Euler to Weierstrass, Springer-Verlag, 1986.
C. B. Boyer, Analysis: Notes on the evolution of a subject and a name, Math. Teacher 47 (1954) 450–462.
G. J. Chaitin, Thoughts on the Riemann Hypothesis, Math. Intelligencer 26:1 (2004) 4–7.
C. T. Chong and Y. K. Leong, An interview with Jean-Pierre Serre, Math. Intelligencer 8:4 (1986) 8–13.
B. Cipra, At math meetings, Enormous Theorem eclipses Fermat, Science 267 (10 Febr. 1995) 794–795.
B. Cipra, New computer insights from ‘transparent’ proofs. In What’s Happening in the Mathematical Sciences, vol. 1, Amer. Math. Society, 1993, pp. 7–11.
J. Dauben, Conceptual revolutions and the history of mathematics: two studies in the growth of knowledge. In Revolutions in Mathematics, ed. by D. Gillies, Oxford Univ. Press, 1992, pp. 49–82.
J. W. Dawson, The Life and Work of Kurt Gödel, A K Peters, 1997. (See especially the essay titled Logical Dilemmas.)
R. A. De Millo, R. J. Lipton, and A. J. Perlis, Social processes and proofs of theorems and programs, Math. Intelligencer 3:1 (1980) 31–40.
J. Dhombres and J. – B. Robert, Book Review: Joseph Fourier, 1768–1830: Créateur de la Physique-Mathématique, Berlin, 1998. In Math. Intelligencer 25:4 (2003) 77–80.
J. Dieudonné, Mathematics—the Music of Reason, Springer-Verlag, 1992.
J. Dieudonné, The beginnings of Italian algebraic geometry. In Studies in the History of Mathematics, ed. by E. R. Phillips, Math. Assoc. of Amer., 1987, pp. 278–299.
C. H. Edwards, The Historical Development of the Calculus, Springer-Verlag, 1979.
H. M. Edwards, Mathematical ideas, ideals, and ideology, Math. Intelligencer 14:2 (1992) 6–19.
D. Epstein and S. Levy, Experimentation and proof in mathematics, Noticesof the Amer. Math. Soc. 42 (1995) 670–674.
D. Gorenstein, The Enormous Theorem, Scientific Amer. (Dec. 1985) 104–115.
I. Grattan-Guinness, The Development of the Foundations of Mathematical Analysis from Euler to Riemann, MIT Press, 1970.
J. Gray, Weierstrass, Luzin, and intuition, Amer. Math. Monthly 108 (2001) 865–870.
B. Grünbaum and G. C. Shephard, A new look at Euler’s theorem for polyhedra, Amer. Math. Monthly 101 (1994) 109–128.
T. L. Hankins, Sir William Rowan Hamilton, The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1980.
H. Hellman, Great Feuds in Mathematics, Wiley, 2006.
J. Horgan, The death of proof, Scientific Amer. 269 (Oct. 1993) 92–103.
A. Jackson, Comme appelé du néant—as if summoned from the void: the life of Alexandre Grothendieck, Notices of the Amer. Math. Soc. 51 (2004) 1038–1055.
A. Jaffe and F. Quinn, ‘Theoretical mathematics’: Toward a cultural synthesis of mathematics and theoretical physics, Bulletinof the Amer. Math. Soc. 29 (1993) 1–13.
D. M. Jesseph, Squaring the Circle. The War between Hobbes and Wallis, Univ. of Chicago Press, 1999.
V. J. Katz, A History of Mathematics: An Introduction, 3rd ed., Addison-Wesley, 2009.
G. Kampis, L. Kvasz and M. Stöltzner (eds.), Appraising Lakatos: Mathematics, Methodology and the Man, Kluwer, 2002.
M. Kline, Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times, Oxford Univ. Press, 1972.
W. Knorr, Construction as existence proof in ancient geometry, Ancient Philosophy 3 (1983) 125–148.
G. Kolata, Mathematical proofs: the genesis of reasonable doubt, Science 192 (June 1976) 989–990.
S. G. Kranz, The immortality of proof, Noticesof the Amer. Math. Soc. 41 (1994) 10–13.
I. Lakatos, Proofs and Refutations, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1976.
C. W. H. Lam, How reliable is a computer-based proof?, Math. Intelligencer 12:1 (1990) 8–12.
J. Lambek, If Hamilton had prevailed: quaternions in physics, Math. Intelligencer 17:4 (1995) 7–15.
S. Lang, Mordell’s review, Siegel’s letter to Mordell, diophantine geometry, and 20th century mathematics, Noticesof the Amer. Math. Soc. 42 (1995) 339–350.
R. E. Langer, Fourier series: the genesis and evolution of a theory, Amer. Math. Monthly 54S (1947) 1–86.
D. Laugwitz, Bernhard Riemann, 1826–1866, Birkhäuser, 1999.
Y. I. Manin, Truth, rigour, and common sense. In Truth in Mathematics, ed. by H. G. Dales and G. Oliveri, Oxford Univ. Press, 1998, pp. 147–159.
Y. I. Manin, How convincing is a proof?, Math. Intelligencer 2:1 (1979) 17–18.
A. F. Monna, Hermann Hankel, Niew. Arch. voor Wisk. 21 (1973) 64–87.
G. H. Moore, At cross-purposes: The Gödel-Zermelo letters, Bulletin Can. Soc. Hist. Phil. Math. 27 (Nov. 2000) 6–8.
G. H. Moore, Zermelo’s Axiom of Choice: Its Origins, Development, and Influence, Springer-Verlag, 1982.
L. J. Mordell, Book review: Diophantine geometry, by S. Lang, Bulletinof the Amer. Math. Soc. 70 (1964) 491–498.
E. Neuenschwander, Studies in the history of complex function theory II: Interactions among the French School, Riemann, and Weierstrass, Bulletinof the Amer. Math. Soc. 5 (1981) 87–105.
J. Paradis, J. Pla, and P. Viader, Fermat and the quadrature of the folium of Descartes, Amer. Math. Monthly 111 (2004) 216–229.
G. Polya, Induction and Analogy in Mathematics, Princeton Univ. Press, 1953.
M. O. Rabin, Probabilistic algorithms. In Algorithms and Complexity: New Directions and Recent Results, ed. by J. F. Traub, Academic Press, 1976, pp. 21–40.
J. R. Ravetz, Vibrating strings and arbitrary functions. In The Logic of Personal Knowledge: Essays Presented to M. Polanyi on his Seventieth Birthday, The Free Press, 1961, pp. 71–88.
B. A. Rosenfeld, A History of Non-Euclidean Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1988. (Translated from the Russian by A. Shenitzer.)
G.-C. Rota, The concept of mathematical truth. In Essays on Humanistic Mathematics, ed. by A. M. White, Math. Assoc. of Amer., 1993, pp. 91–96.
D. E. Rowe, On projecting the future and assessing the past—the 1946 Princeton bicentennial conference, Math. Intelligencer 25:4 (2003) 8–15.
D. E. Rowe, Episodes in the Berlin-Göttingen rivalry, 1870–1930, Math. Intelligencer 22:1 (2000) 60–69.
A. Shenitzer, The Cinderella career of projective geometry, Math. Intelligencer 13:2 (1991) 50–55.
S. Smale, Algebra and complexity theory, Bulletin of the Amer. Math. Soc. 4 (1981) 1–36.
J. Spencer, Short theorems with long proofs, Amer. Math. Monthly 90 (1983) 365–366.
M. Stöltzner, What Lakatos could teach the mathematical physicists. In Appraising Lakatos: Mathematics, Methodology and the Man, ed. by G. Kampis, L. Kvasz and M. Stöltzner, Kluwer, 2002, pp. 157–187.
D. J. Struik, A Concise History of Mathematics, 4th ed., Dover, 1987.
W. P. Thurston, On proof and progress in mathematics, Bulletinof the Amer. Math. Soc. 30 (1994) 161–177.
C. Truesdell, The rational mechanics of flexible or elastic bodies, 1638–1788. In L. Euler, Opera, Ser. 2, Vol. 11, 1960, Section 2.
K. Volkert, Zur Differentzierbarkeit stetiger Funktionen—Ampère’s Beweis und seine Folgen, Arch. Hist. Exact Sc. 40 (1989) 37–112.
K. Volkert, Die Geschichte der pathologischen Funktionen—Ein Beitrag zur Enstehung der mathematischen Methologie, Arch. Hist. Exact Sc. 37 (1987) 193–232.
J. Von Neumann, The role of mathematics in the sciences and society, Collected Works, Vol. 4, ed. by A.H. Taub, Macmillan, 1963, pp. 477–490.
R. Westfall, Never at Rest, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1980.
H. Weyl, Axiomatic versus constructive procedures in mathematics, Math. Intelligencer 7:4 (1985) 10–17, 38.
H. Weyl, Mathematics and logic, Amer. Math. Monthly 53 (1946) 2–13.
O. Zariski, The fundamental ideas of abstract algebraic geometry. In Proceedings of the Intern. Congr. of Mathematicians, 1950, Vol. II, Amer. Math. Society, 1952, pp. 77–89.
D. Zeilberger, Theorems for a price: tomorrow’s semi-rigorous mathematical culture, Noticesof the Amer. Math. Soc. 40 (1993) 978–981.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kleiner, I. (2012). Proof: A Many-Splendored Thing. In: Excursions in the History of Mathematics. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-8268-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-8268-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser Boston
Print ISBN: 978-0-8176-8267-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-8176-8268-2
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)