Abstract
The notion of quality of life (QoL) has recently received a high profile in the biomedical, the bioeconomic, and the biostatistical literature. This is despite the fact that the notion lacks a formal definition. The literature on QoL is fragmented and diverse because each of its constituents emphasizes its own point of view. Discussions have centered around ways of defining QoL, ways of making it operational, and ways of making it relevant to medical decision making. An integrated picture showing how all of the above can be brought together is desirable. The purpose of this chapter is to propose a framework that does the above. This we do via a Bayesian hierarchical model. Our framework includes linkages with item response theory, survival analysis, and accelerated testing. More important, it paves the way for proposing a definition of QoL.
This is an expository chapter. Our aim is to provide an architecture for conceptualizing the notion of QoL and its role in health care planning. Our approach could be of relevance to other scenarios such as educational, psychometric, and sociometric testing, marketing, sports science, and quality assessment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cole, B. F. and Kilbridge, K. L. (2002). Quality-adjusted survival analysis, In Statistical Methods for Quality of Life Studies (Eds., M. Mesbah, B. Cole, and M. T. Lee), pp. 267–277, Kluwer, Boston.
Cox, D. R., Fitzpatrick, R., Fletcher, A. E., Gore, S. M., Spiegelhalter, D. J., and Jones, D. R. (1992). Quality-of-life assessment: Can we keep it simple?, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 155, 353–393.
Fischer, G. H. and Molenaar, I. W., Eds. (1995). Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications, Papers from the workshop held in Vienna, February 25–27, 1993, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Fitzpatrick, R., Fletcher, A., Gore, S., Jones, D. Spiegelhalter, D., and Cox D. (1992). Quality of life measures in health care, Parts I, II, and III, British Medical Journal 305, 1074–1077.
Johnson, V. E. and Albert, J. H. (1999). Ordinal Data Modeling, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Mesbah, M., Cole, B. F., and Lee, M. L. T. (Eds.) (2002). Statistical Design, Measurements and Analysis of Health Related Quality of Life, Kluwer, Amsterdam.
Sen, P. K. (2002). Measures of quality adjusted life and quality of life defficiency: Statistical perspectives, In Statistical Methods for Quality of Life Studies (Eds., M. Mesbah, B. Cole, and M. T. Lee), pp. 255–266, Kluwer, Boston.
Slevin, M., Plant H., Lynch D., Drinkwater I., and Gregory, W. M. (1988). Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient?, British Journal of Cancer, 57, 109–112.
WHOQoL Group (1994). The development of the World Health Organization quality of life assessment instrument, In Quality of Life Assessment: International Perspectives (Eds., J. Orley and W. Kuyken), Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
Zhao, H. and Tsiatis, A. A. (2000). Estimating mean quality of lifetime with censored data, Sankhyā, Series B, 62, 175–188.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Birkhäuser Boston
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mesbah, M., Singpurwalla, N.D. (2008). A Bayesian Ponders “The Quality of Life”. In: Vonta, F., Nikulin, M., Limnios, N., Huber-Carol, C. (eds) Statistical Models and Methods for Biomedical and Technical Systems. Statistics for Industry and Technology. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4619-6_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4619-6_26
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser Boston
Print ISBN: 978-0-8176-4464-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-8176-4619-6
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)