Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Statistics for Industry and Technology ((SIT))

Abstract

The notion of quality of life (QoL) has recently received a high profile in the biomedical, the bioeconomic, and the biostatistical literature. This is despite the fact that the notion lacks a formal definition. The literature on QoL is fragmented and diverse because each of its constituents emphasizes its own point of view. Discussions have centered around ways of defining QoL, ways of making it operational, and ways of making it relevant to medical decision making. An integrated picture showing how all of the above can be brought together is desirable. The purpose of this chapter is to propose a framework that does the above. This we do via a Bayesian hierarchical model. Our framework includes linkages with item response theory, survival analysis, and accelerated testing. More important, it paves the way for proposing a definition of QoL.

This is an expository chapter. Our aim is to provide an architecture for conceptualizing the notion of QoL and its role in health care planning. Our approach could be of relevance to other scenarios such as educational, psychometric, and sociometric testing, marketing, sports science, and quality assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cole, B. F. and Kilbridge, K. L. (2002). Quality-adjusted survival analysis, In Statistical Methods for Quality of Life Studies (Eds., M. Mesbah, B. Cole, and M. T. Lee), pp. 267–277, Kluwer, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cox, D. R., Fitzpatrick, R., Fletcher, A. E., Gore, S. M., Spiegelhalter, D. J., and Jones, D. R. (1992). Quality-of-life assessment: Can we keep it simple?, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 155, 353–393.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fischer, G. H. and Molenaar, I. W., Eds. (1995). Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications, Papers from the workshop held in Vienna, February 25–27, 1993, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Fitzpatrick, R., Fletcher, A., Gore, S., Jones, D. Spiegelhalter, D., and Cox D. (1992). Quality of life measures in health care, Parts I, II, and III, British Medical Journal 305, 1074–1077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson, V. E. and Albert, J. H. (1999). Ordinal Data Modeling, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Mesbah, M., Cole, B. F., and Lee, M. L. T. (Eds.) (2002). Statistical Design, Measurements and Analysis of Health Related Quality of Life, Kluwer, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sen, P. K. (2002). Measures of quality adjusted life and quality of life defficiency: Statistical perspectives, In Statistical Methods for Quality of Life Studies (Eds., M. Mesbah, B. Cole, and M. T. Lee), pp. 255–266, Kluwer, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Slevin, M., Plant H., Lynch D., Drinkwater I., and Gregory, W. M. (1988). Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient?, British Journal of Cancer, 57, 109–112.

    Google Scholar 

  9. WHOQoL Group (1994). The development of the World Health Organization quality of life assessment instrument, In Quality of Life Assessment: International Perspectives (Eds., J. Orley and W. Kuyken), Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao, H. and Tsiatis, A. A. (2000). Estimating mean quality of lifetime with censored data, Sankhyā, Series B, 62, 175–188.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Birkhäuser Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mesbah, M., Singpurwalla, N.D. (2008). A Bayesian Ponders “The Quality of Life”. In: Vonta, F., Nikulin, M., Limnios, N., Huber-Carol, C. (eds) Statistical Models and Methods for Biomedical and Technical Systems. Statistics for Industry and Technology. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4619-6_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics