Skip to main content

Safety Assessment in Pilot Studies When Zero Events Are Observed

  • Chapter
Advances in Statistical Methods for the Health Sciences

Part of the book series: Statistics for Industry and Technology ((SIT))

Abstract

Pilot studies in clinical research settings frequently focus on estimating the frequency of occurrence of certain adverse events. When zero such events are observed, the question of legitimate inference on the true event rate arises. The relationship between binomial and geometric distributions’ confidence intervals yields two useful graphical displays and interpretations for the event rate inference in this circumstance. The interval is also closely related to the Bayesian credible interval when the prior distribution for the event rate is uniform. In addition, the simple algebraic expression for the confidence bound is seen to be useful in the context of planning studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Clopper, C. J., and Pearson, E. S. (1934). The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial, Biometrika, 26, 406–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Friedman, L. M., Furberg, C., and DeMets, D. L. (1998). Fundamentals of Clinical Trials, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lewis, J. A. (1981). Cost-marketing surveillance — How many patients?, Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 2, 93–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Louis, T. A. (1981). Confidence intervals for a binomial parameter after observing no successes, The American Statistician, 35, 154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schoenfeld, D. (1980). Statistical considerations for pilot studies, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 6, 371–374.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Spilker, B. (1991). Guide to Clinical Trials, Raven, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thall, P. F., and Simon, R. M. (1994). Practical Bayesian guidelines for phase IIB clinical trials, Biometrics, 50, 337–349.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Winkler, R. L., Smith, J. E., and Fryback, D. G. (2002). The role of informative priors in zero-numerator problems: Being conservative versus being candid, The American Statistician, 56, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Birkhäuser Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carter, R.E., Woolson, R.F. (2007). Safety Assessment in Pilot Studies When Zero Events Are Observed. In: Auget, JL., Balakrishnan, N., Mesbah, M., Molenberghs, G. (eds) Advances in Statistical Methods for the Health Sciences. Statistics for Industry and Technology. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4542-7_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics