Abstract
Few methods for cancer clinical trials have been proposed in the past decade to evaluate treatments on the basis of joint efficacy and toxicity endpoints. The primary goal of a new cancer treatment is to improve efficacy. Because of the antagonist relationship between efficacy and toxicity, a critical question is to achieve this improvement without increasing unacceptably the risk of a severe toxicity. In this paper, two methods due to Letierce et al. (2003) and Tubert-Bitter et al. (2005) are compared in a simulation study. They are both nonparametric and, besides the joint approach of efficacy and toxicity, they consider the cumulative doses at which efficacy and toxicity occur, with the idea that it is better for the patient to attain efficacy at a small dose and to experience toxicity, if it happens, at the highest dose possible. These methods are detailed in the same framework. For the simulation study, the two true correlated doses at which efficacy and toxicity occur are generated from a Clayton model with Weibull marginal distributions. A fixed censoring value is considered, corresponding to the total dose of drug received at the end of the trial by the patients. Treatment groups of size 50 and 100 patients were simulated with 50%, 65%, and 80% of efficacy and 20%, 35%, and 50% of toxicity. Two values for the correlation of the variables were considered. One thousand simulations were run to estimate the type I error rate and the power of the tests. A few features were observed depending on the sample size, the correlation of the variables, and whether the difference between the two simulated treatments concerned efficacy, toxicity, or both.
Keywords and phrases
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bloch, D. A., Lai, T. L., and Tubert-Bitter, P. (2001). One-sided tests in clinical trials with multiple endpoints, Biometrics, 57, 1039–1047.
Bloch, D. A., and Silverman, B. W. (1997). Monotone discriminant functions and their applications in rhumatology, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92, 144–153.
Dykstra, R., Kochar, S., and Robertson, T. (1995). Inference for likelihood ratio ordering in the two-sample problem, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 1034–1040.
Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap, Chapman & Hall, San Francisco.
Genest, C., and Mac Kay, J. (1986). The joy of copulas: Bivariate distributions with uniform marginals, The American Statistician, 40, 280–283.
Jennison, C., and Turnbull, B. W. (1993). Group sequential tests for bivariate response: Interim analyses of clinical trials with both efficacy and safety endpoints, Biometrics, 49, 741–752.
Lehmann, E. (1955). Ordered families of distributions, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 26, 399–404.
Letierce, A., Tubert-Bitter, P., Maccario, J., and Kramar, A. (2003). Two treatment comparison based on joint toxicity and efficacy ordered alternatives in cancer trials, Statistics in Medicine, 22, 859–868.
Marshall, A. W., and Olkin, I. (1988). Families of multivariate distributions, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 834–841.
Robertson, T., Wright, F. T., and Dykstra, R. L. (1988). Order-Restricted Statistical Inferences, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Thall, P., and Cheng, S.-C. (1999). Treatment comparisons based on twodimensional safety and efficacy alternatives in oncology trials, Biometrics, 55, 746–753.
Tubert-Bitter, P., Bloch, D. A., Letierce, A., and Kramar, A. (2005). A nonparametric comparison of the effectiveness of treatments: A multivariate toxicity-penalized approach, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 15, 129–142.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Birkhäuser Boston
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Letierce, A., Tubert-Bitter, P. (2007). Cancer Clinical Trials with Efficacy and Toxicity Endpoints: A Simulation Study to Compare Two Nonparametric Methods. In: Auget, JL., Balakrishnan, N., Mesbah, M., Molenberghs, G. (eds) Advances in Statistical Methods for the Health Sciences. Statistics for Industry and Technology. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4542-7_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4542-7_22
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser Boston
Print ISBN: 978-0-8176-4368-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-8176-4542-7
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)