Skip to main content

Fuzzy Inference and Control Methods Involving Two Kinds of Uncertainties

  • Chapter
Fuzzy Modeling and Fuzzy Control

Part of the book series: Control Engineering ((CONTRENGIN))

Abstract

In the area of fuzzy control, there are four inference methods, including Mamdani inference [17]. Larsen inference [13], Tsukamoto inference [19], and Takagi-Sugeno inference [18]. Common features of these inference methods are [4]: (1) the knowledge base is composed of fuzzy rules; (2) the uncertainty of reasoning is from the linguistic description of premises (or, sometimes consequences) or fuzzy rules (e.g., positively big, very bad, etc.); and (3) each rule in the knowledge base is believed to be completely creditable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. A. Basu, A. K. Majumdar, and S. Sinha, “An expert system approach to control system design and analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 685–694, Sept.–Oct. 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. C. E. Bozdag, C. Kahraman and D. Ruan, “Fuzzy group decision making for selection among computer integrated manufacturing systems,” Computers in Industry, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 13–29, May 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. B. G. Buchanan and E. H. Shortliffe, Eds., Rule-Based Expert System: The MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. M. Chen, “A new approach to handling fuzzy decision-making problems,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1012–1016, Nov.–Dec. 1988.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. F. Chiclana, F. Herrera, and E. Herrera-Viedma, “Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a multipurpose decision-making model based on fuzzy preference relations,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 122, no. 2 pp. 277–291, Sept. 2001.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. T. Fujita and S. Iwamoto, “An optimistic decision-making in fuzzy environment,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 120, no.1–3, pp. 123–137, May 2001.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. M. B. Gorzalczany, “A method of inference in approximate reasoning based on interval-valued fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–17, Jan. 1987.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. S. J. Henkind and M. C. Harrison, “An analysis of four uncertainty calculi,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 700–714, Sept.–Oct. 1988.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. D. H. Hong and C. H. Choi, “Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 103–113, Aug. 2000.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. K. Huan, Introduction to Expert Systems, Nanjing, China: Southeast University Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. J. Huang and F. S. Wang, “Fuzzy decision-making design of chemical plant using mixed-integer hybrid differential evolution,” Computers and Chemical Engineering, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 1649–1660, Dec. 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. K. J. Hunt, D. Sbarbaro, R. Bikowski, and P. J. Gawthrop, “Neural networks for control systems-A survey,” Automatica, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1083–1112, Nov. 1992.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. P. M. Larsen, “Industrial applications of fuzzy logic control,” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 3–10, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  14. N. S. Lee, Y. L. Grize, and K. Dehnad, “Quantitative models for reasoning under uncertainty in knowledge-based expert system,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 15–38, 1987.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. D. Li, “Fuzzy multiattribute decision-making models and methods with incomplete preference information,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 113–119, Sept. 1999.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Lu, H. Zhang, and L. Chen, “A fuzzy control approach concerning with rule’s confidence,” Control and Decision, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 225–228, 1992. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. H. Mamdani, “Advances in the linguistic synthesis of fuzzy controllers,” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 669–678, 1976.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. K. M. Passino and S. Yurkovich, Fuzzy Control, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Y. Tsukamoto, “An approach to fuzzy reasoning method,”, in Advances in Fuzzy Set Theory and Applications, Edited by M. M. Gupta, R. K. Ragade, and R. R. Yager, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  20. L. A. Zadeh, “Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 28–44, 1973.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. L. A. Zadeh, “The role of fuzzy logic in the management of uncertainty in expert systems,” Fuzzy Sets Systems, vol. 11, no. 1–3, pp. 197–198, 1983.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. H. Zhang and L. Chen, “A technique for handling fuzzy decision-making problems concerning two kinds of uncertainty,” Cybernetics and Systems, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 681–698, 1991.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. H. Zhang and L. Chen, “A fuzzy decision-making technique with two kinds of uncertainty,” Science in China, Series A: Mathematics Physics Astronomy, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 1508–1518, 1991.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. H. Zhang and W. Xu, “Modern control theory applied to 200MW boiler: Turbine unit control,” Proceedings of the IFAC Symposium on Power Systems and Power Plant Control, Beijing, China, Aug. 1986, pp. 330–336.

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. J. Zimmermann, Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications, 4th Ed., Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  26. K. Zou and Y. Xu, Fuzzy Systems and Expert Systems, Sichuan, China: Southwest Jiaotong University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. Zwick, E. Carlstein, and D. V. Budescu, “Measures of similarity among fuzzy concepts: A comparative analysis,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 221–242, Apr. 1987.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Birkhäuser Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2006). Fuzzy Inference and Control Methods Involving Two Kinds of Uncertainties. In: Fuzzy Modeling and Fuzzy Control. Control Engineering. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4539-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4539-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser Boston

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-8176-4491-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-8176-4539-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics