Skip to main content

The History of Circumcision in the United States

A Physician’s Perspective

  • Chapter
Male and Female Circumcision

Abstract

For most of its existence, the United States, with its overwhelmingly Protestant population of Northern-European descent, has had no tradition or history of circumcision. Medicalised circumcision did not appear until the latter part of the nineteenth century, when some members of the American medical establishment began to believe that circumcision could cure such wide-ranging real and fictitious diseases as insanity, masturbation, epilepsy, paralysis, hernia, hip-joint disease, tuberculosis, cancer, venereal disease, and headache, to name just a few. The belief in circumcision as a panacea has continued to this day, and the list of diseases that circumcision is said to prevent and cure has increased and changed to meet evolving national anxieties. As a result of the accumulated weight of these beliefs, a programme of universal, neonatal circumcision was instituted in many American hospitals during the Cold War era.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hodges F. A short history of the institutionalization of involuntary sexual mutilation in the United States In: Denniston GC, Milos MF, eds Sexual Mutilations: A Human Tragedy. New York and London: Plenum Press 1997:17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cockshut RW. Circumcision. BMJ 1935;2:764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Campbell MF. The male genital tract and the female urethra. In: Campbell MF, Hamson JH, eds Urology. vol. 2. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company. 1970;1836.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barlett FH. Infants and Children: Their Feeding and Growth. Revised edition. New York: Farrar & Rinehart, Inc. 1932:202.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For an example of this sort of fearmongering, see: Weiss GN. Prophylactic neonatal surgery and infectious diseases. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1997;16:727–34 [here, p. 132.].

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Morgan WKC. The rape of the phallus JAMA 1965;193:223–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Foley JM. The male prepuce. JAMA 1961;175:1185–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Foley JM. Circumcision. JAMA 1954;156:1636.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Foley JM. The unkindest cut of all. Fact (July) 1966;3(4):2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Preston EN. Whither the foreskin? A consideration of routine neonatal circumcision. JAMA 1970;213:1853–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Marshall VF. Should circumcision of infant males be routine? Medical Record and Annals 1954;48:790–2.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Spock B. The Common Sense Book of Baby and Child Care. New edition, completely revised. New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce. 1957:155.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Spock B. Circumcision—it’s not necessary. Dr. Spock now believes that circumcision of males is traumatic, painful and of questionable value. Redbook (April) 1989;172(6):53.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Committee On Fetus and Newborn. Standards and Recommendations for Hospital Care of Newborn Infants. 5th ed. Evanston: American Academy of Pediatrics. 1971:110.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thompson HC, King LR, Knox E, Korones SB. Report of the ad hoc task force on circumcision. Pediatrics 1975;56:610–1.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schoen EJ, Anderson G, Bohon C, Hinman F Jr, Poland RL, Wakeman EM. Report of the task force on circumcision. Pediatrics 1989;84:388–91.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Editor. AAP circumcision task force. AAP News (February) 1997;13(2):36.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stang HJ, Snellman LW. Circumcision practice patterns in the United States Pediatrics 1998;101(6): URL. http://www.pediatrics.org.cgi.content.full/l0l/6/e5.

  19. Marshall FF. editorial comment to: Gearhart JP. Complications of pediatric circumcision. In: Marshall FF, ed. Urologic Complications: Medical and Surgica1, Adult and Pediatric. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc. 1986:387–96. [here, p. 395.].

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gearhart JP. Complications of pediatric circumcision. In: Marshall FF, ed. Urologic Complications: Medical and Surgical, Adult and Pediatric Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc. 1986:387–96.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gearhart JP, Rock JA. Tota1 ablation of the penis after circumcision with electrocautery: a method of management and long-term followup. J Urol 1989;142:799–801.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Racher P. Grand jury to probe death of baby after circumcision. Des Moines Register (November 20, 1982):3A.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rogers P, Wallace R. Infant bleeds to death after being circumcised. Miami Herald (June 26, 1993):Bl–B2.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Associated Press Circumcision that didn’t heal kills boy. The boy’s circumcision wasn’t healing properly. News 5 Net (October 20, 1998): URL. http://www.newsnet5.com/news/stories/news-981020-05ll23.html.

  25. Gellis SS. Circumcision. Am J Dis Child 1978;132:1168–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gellis SS. Circumcision. Am J Dis Child 1979;133:1079–80.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Werker PMN, Terng ASC, Kon M. The prepuce free flap: dissection feasibility study and clinical application of a super-thin new flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:1075–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Taylor JR, Lockwood AP, Taylor AJ. The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision. Br J Urol 1996;77:291–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Anand KJS, Hickey PR. Pain and its effects in the human neonate and fetus. N Engl J Med 1987;317:1321–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Blass EM, Hoffmeyer LB. Sucrose as an analgesic for newborn infants Pediatrics 1991;87:215–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Heitsch G. Swaddling Eases Circumcision. AAP News (July) 1997;13(7):3.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Marchette L, Main R, Redick E, Bagg A, Leatherland J. Pain reduction interventions during neonatal circumcision. Nurs Res 1991;40:241–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ryan CA, Finer NN. Changing attitudes and practices regarding local analgesia for newborn circumcision. Pediutrics 1994;94:230–3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wiswell TE, Bass JW. Decreased incidence of urinary tract infections in circumcised male infants Pediatrics 1985;75:901–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Winberg J, Gothefors L, Bollgren I, Herthelius M. The prepuce: a mistake of nature? Lancet 1989;1:598–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Pisacane A, Graziano L, Mazzarella G, Scarpellino B, Zona G. Breast-feeding and urinary tract infection. J Pediutr 1992;120:87–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Coppa GV, Gabrielli O, Giorgi P, Catassi C, Montanari MP, Varaldo PE, Nichols BL. Preliminary study of breastfeeding and bacterial adhesion to uroepithelial cells. Lancet 1990;335:569–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Gothefors L, Olling S, Winberg J. Breast feeding and biological properties of faecal E. coli strains. Acta Puediutr Scund 1975;54:807–12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sorrells, M.L. (1999). The History of Circumcision in the United States. In: Denniston, G.C., Hodges, F.M., Milos, M.F. (eds) Male and Female Circumcision. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-39937-9_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-39937-9_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-46131-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-585-39937-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics