Abstract
For most of its existence, the United States, with its overwhelmingly Protestant population of Northern-European descent, has had no tradition or history of circumcision. Medicalised circumcision did not appear until the latter part of the nineteenth century, when some members of the American medical establishment began to believe that circumcision could cure such wide-ranging real and fictitious diseases as insanity, masturbation, epilepsy, paralysis, hernia, hip-joint disease, tuberculosis, cancer, venereal disease, and headache, to name just a few. The belief in circumcision as a panacea has continued to this day, and the list of diseases that circumcision is said to prevent and cure has increased and changed to meet evolving national anxieties. As a result of the accumulated weight of these beliefs, a programme of universal, neonatal circumcision was instituted in many American hospitals during the Cold War era.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Hodges F. A short history of the institutionalization of involuntary sexual mutilation in the United States In: Denniston GC, Milos MF, eds Sexual Mutilations: A Human Tragedy. New York and London: Plenum Press 1997:17–40.
Cockshut RW. Circumcision. BMJ 1935;2:764.
Campbell MF. The male genital tract and the female urethra. In: Campbell MF, Hamson JH, eds Urology. vol. 2. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company. 1970;1836.
Barlett FH. Infants and Children: Their Feeding and Growth. Revised edition. New York: Farrar & Rinehart, Inc. 1932:202.
For an example of this sort of fearmongering, see: Weiss GN. Prophylactic neonatal surgery and infectious diseases. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1997;16:727–34 [here, p. 132.].
Morgan WKC. The rape of the phallus JAMA 1965;193:223–4.
Foley JM. The male prepuce. JAMA 1961;175:1185–6.
Foley JM. Circumcision. JAMA 1954;156:1636.
Foley JM. The unkindest cut of all. Fact (July) 1966;3(4):2–9.
Preston EN. Whither the foreskin? A consideration of routine neonatal circumcision. JAMA 1970;213:1853–8.
Marshall VF. Should circumcision of infant males be routine? Medical Record and Annals 1954;48:790–2.
Spock B. The Common Sense Book of Baby and Child Care. New edition, completely revised. New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce. 1957:155.
Spock B. Circumcision—it’s not necessary. Dr. Spock now believes that circumcision of males is traumatic, painful and of questionable value. Redbook (April) 1989;172(6):53.
Committee On Fetus and Newborn. Standards and Recommendations for Hospital Care of Newborn Infants. 5th ed. Evanston: American Academy of Pediatrics. 1971:110.
Thompson HC, King LR, Knox E, Korones SB. Report of the ad hoc task force on circumcision. Pediatrics 1975;56:610–1.
Schoen EJ, Anderson G, Bohon C, Hinman F Jr, Poland RL, Wakeman EM. Report of the task force on circumcision. Pediatrics 1989;84:388–91.
Editor. AAP circumcision task force. AAP News (February) 1997;13(2):36.
Stang HJ, Snellman LW. Circumcision practice patterns in the United States Pediatrics 1998;101(6): URL. http://www.pediatrics.org.cgi.content.full/l0l/6/e5.
Marshall FF. editorial comment to: Gearhart JP. Complications of pediatric circumcision. In: Marshall FF, ed. Urologic Complications: Medical and Surgica1, Adult and Pediatric. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc. 1986:387–96. [here, p. 395.].
Gearhart JP. Complications of pediatric circumcision. In: Marshall FF, ed. Urologic Complications: Medical and Surgical, Adult and Pediatric Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc. 1986:387–96.
Gearhart JP, Rock JA. Tota1 ablation of the penis after circumcision with electrocautery: a method of management and long-term followup. J Urol 1989;142:799–801.
Racher P. Grand jury to probe death of baby after circumcision. Des Moines Register (November 20, 1982):3A.
Rogers P, Wallace R. Infant bleeds to death after being circumcised. Miami Herald (June 26, 1993):Bl–B2.
Associated Press Circumcision that didn’t heal kills boy. The boy’s circumcision wasn’t healing properly. News 5 Net (October 20, 1998): URL. http://www.newsnet5.com/news/stories/news-981020-05ll23.html.
Gellis SS. Circumcision. Am J Dis Child 1978;132:1168–9.
Gellis SS. Circumcision. Am J Dis Child 1979;133:1079–80.
Werker PMN, Terng ASC, Kon M. The prepuce free flap: dissection feasibility study and clinical application of a super-thin new flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:1075–82.
Taylor JR, Lockwood AP, Taylor AJ. The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision. Br J Urol 1996;77:291–5.
Anand KJS, Hickey PR. Pain and its effects in the human neonate and fetus. N Engl J Med 1987;317:1321–9.
Blass EM, Hoffmeyer LB. Sucrose as an analgesic for newborn infants Pediatrics 1991;87:215–8.
Heitsch G. Swaddling Eases Circumcision. AAP News (July) 1997;13(7):3.
Marchette L, Main R, Redick E, Bagg A, Leatherland J. Pain reduction interventions during neonatal circumcision. Nurs Res 1991;40:241–4.
Ryan CA, Finer NN. Changing attitudes and practices regarding local analgesia for newborn circumcision. Pediutrics 1994;94:230–3.
Wiswell TE, Bass JW. Decreased incidence of urinary tract infections in circumcised male infants Pediatrics 1985;75:901–3.
Winberg J, Gothefors L, Bollgren I, Herthelius M. The prepuce: a mistake of nature? Lancet 1989;1:598–9.
Pisacane A, Graziano L, Mazzarella G, Scarpellino B, Zona G. Breast-feeding and urinary tract infection. J Pediutr 1992;120:87–9.
Coppa GV, Gabrielli O, Giorgi P, Catassi C, Montanari MP, Varaldo PE, Nichols BL. Preliminary study of breastfeeding and bacterial adhesion to uroepithelial cells. Lancet 1990;335:569–71.
Gothefors L, Olling S, Winberg J. Breast feeding and biological properties of faecal E. coli strains. Acta Puediutr Scund 1975;54:807–12.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sorrells, M.L. (1999). The History of Circumcision in the United States. In: Denniston, G.C., Hodges, F.M., Milos, M.F. (eds) Male and Female Circumcision. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-39937-9_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-39937-9_28
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-46131-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-585-39937-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive