Skip to main content

Socioeconomic Impacts and Social Implications of Reducing Pesticide and Agricultural Chemical Use in the United States

  • Chapter
The Pesticide Question

Abstract

The struggle over agricultural pesticides, which will soon enter its fourth decade, has long involved conflicting interests, opposing ideologies, and contradictory technical and social science data. This paper will focus on one dimension of these conflicts: debate over the prospective socioeconomic impacts of substantial reductions in the use of pesticides and other agricultural chemicals. Research on this topic is obviously central to pesticide politics and policy, since both sides of the struggle ultimately base their positions on claims that chemicals are or are not integral to the social and economic well-being of agriculturalists and of society as a whole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, W.M. 1990. Green Development. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azzam, A., G.A. Helmers, and M.F. Spilker. 1990. “U.S. agriculture under fertilizer and chemical restrictions, part 2.” Report No. 163, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosso, C.J. 1987. Pesticides and Politics. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, L., W.B. Lacy, J. Burkhardt, and L.R. Lacy. 1991. Plants, Power, and Profit. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttel, F.H. 1990. “Social relations and the growth of modern agriculture.” Pp. 113–146 in C.R. Carroll et al. (eds.), Agroecology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttel, F.H., and G.W. Gillespie Jr. 1988. “Preferences for crop production practices among conventional and alternative agriculturalists.” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 3 (Winter): 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buttel, F.H., G.W. Gillespie Jr., and A. Power. 1990. “Sociological aspects of low-input agriculture in the United States: A New York case study.” Pp. 515–532 in C.A. Edwards et al. (eds.), Sustainable Agricultural Systems. Ankeny, IA: Soil and Water Conservation Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, W.W. 1979. The Development of American Agriculture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conservation Foundation. 1987. State of the Environment. Washington, DC: Conservation Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST). 1990a. Alternative Agriculture: Scientists’ Review. Ames, IA: Council for Agricultural Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST). 1990b. Pesticides and Safety of Fruits and Vegetables. Ames, I A: Council for Agricultural Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubgaard, A. 1989. “The need for a common environmental policy for EC agriculture.” Pp. 35–48 in A. Dubgaard and A.H. Nielsen (eds.), Economic Aspects of Environmental Regulations in Agriculture. Kiel (Germany): Wissenschafts-verlag Vauk Kiel KG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubgaard, A. 1991. “Pesticide regulation in Denmark.” In N. Hanley (ed.), Farming and the Countryside. Oxon, U.K.: C.A.B. International.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. 1990. “Good times are back on the farm, for a bit.” The Economist (10 March):25–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, C.A. et al. (eds.). 1990. Sustainable Agricultural Systems. Ankeny, IA: Soil and Water Conservation Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faeth, P., R. Repetto, K. Kroll, Q. Dai, and G. Helmers. 1991. Paying the Farm Bill: U.S. Agricultural Policy and the Transition to Sustainable Agriculture. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianessi, L.P., and Puffer, C.A. 1991. “Inadequacy of scientific and economic data in pesticide benefits analyses.” Resources No. 104:14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, G.W. Jr., and F.H. Buttel. 1989. “Understanding farm operator opposition to regulation of agricultural chemicals and pharmaceuticals: the role of social class, objective interests, and ideology.” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 4:12–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, D., B. Sorj, and J. Wilkinson. 1987. From Farming to Biotechnology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, R.D., C.R. Taylor, J.B. Penson, and E.G. Smith. 1990. Economic Impacts of Reduced Chemical Use. College Station, TX: Knutson & Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L.R. 1990. “Relationships among groundwater quality, agricultural production, and consumer food prices.” Manuscript, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). 1989. Alternative Agriculture. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oehlaf, R. 1978. Organic Farming. Montclair, NJ: Allanheld, Osmun.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). 1990. Beneath the Bottom Line. Washington, DC: OTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, K.D. 1990. “Modeling farm-level interactions between policy and a farmer’s choice of weed control method.” Manuscript, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, K.D., J. Langley, and E.O. Heady. 1982. “Widespread adoption of organic farming practices: estimated impacts on U.S. agriculture.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (January–February):41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redclift, M. 1987. Sustainable Development. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichelderfer, K.H. 1990. “Environmental protection and agricultural support: are trade-offs necessary?” Pp. 201–230 in K. Allen (ed.), Agricultural Policies in a New Decade. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichelderfer, K.H. 1991. “The expanding role of environmental interests in agricultural policy.” Resources No. 102:4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichelderfer, K.H. and M.K. Hinkle. 1989. “The evolution of pesticide policy: environmental interests and agriculture.” Pp. 147–173 in C.S. Kramer (ed.), The Political Economy of U.S. Agriculture. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, M.W. 1975. The Emergence of Agricultural Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runge, C.F., and R.M. Nolan. 1990. “Trade in disservices: environmental regulation and agricultural trade.” Food Policy (February):3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweeten, L.R., and G.A. Helmers. 1990. “Comment on Alternative Agriculture Systems.” Pp. 134–138 in Alternative Agriculture: Scientists’ Review. Ames, IA: Council for Agricultural Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zilberman, D., A. Schmitz, G. Casterline, E. Lichtenberg, and J.B. Siebert. 1991. “The economics of pesticide use and regulation.” Science 253:518–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

David Pimentel Hugh Lehman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Routledge, Chapman & Hall, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Buttel, F.H. (1993). Socioeconomic Impacts and Social Implications of Reducing Pesticide and Agricultural Chemical Use in the United States. In: Pimentel, D., Lehman, H. (eds) The Pesticide Question. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-36973-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-36973-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-412-03581-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-585-36973-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics