Skip to main content

On The Validation of Fuzzy Knowledge Bases

  • Chapter

Abstract

Roughly speaking, a knowledge base is “potentially inconsistent” or incoherent if there exists a piece of input data which respects integrity constraints and which leads to inconsistency when added to the knowledge base. In the paper we use the framework of possibility theory in order to discuss this problem for fuzzy knowledge bases. More particularly we consider the case where such bases are made of parallel fuzzy rules. There exist several kinds of fuzzy rules: certainty rules, gradual rules, possibility rules. For each kind, the problem of “potential consistency” appears to be different. Only certainty and gradual rules pose serious coherence problems. In each case we caracterize what conditions parallel rules have to satisfy in order to avoid inconsistency problem with input facts. The expression of a fuzzy integrity constraint in terms of impossibility qualification is discussed. The problem of redundancy, which is also of interest for fuzzy knowledge base validation, is briefly addressed for certainty and gradual rules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ayel M., Rousset M.C. (1990) La Cohérence dans les Bases de Connaissances. Cepadues-Editions, Toulouse, France.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beauvieux A., Dague P. (1990) A general consistency (checking and restoring) engine for knowledge bases. Proc. of the 9th Europ. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI’90) (L.C. Aiello, ed.), Stockholm, Sweden, Aug. 6-10, 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benferhat S., Dubois D., Lang J., Prade H. (1992) Hypothetical reasoning in possibilistic logic: basic notions, applications and implementation issues. In: Advances in Fuzzy Systems: Applications and Theory Vol. I (P.Z. Wang, K.F. Loe, eds.), to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bourrelly L., Chouraqui E., Portafaix V. (1992) Les topoï pour la validation structurelle d’une base de connaissances. Journée Francophone de la Validation et de la Vérification des Systèmes à Bases de Connaissances, Dourdan, France, Apr. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dubois D., Lang J., Prade H. (1989) Automated reasoning using possibilistic logic: semantics, belief revision, and variable certainty weights. Preprints of the 5th Workshop on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Windsor, Ont., 81–87. Revised version in IEEE Trans. on Data and Knowledge Engineering, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dubois D., Lang J., Prade H. (1991a) A possibilistic assumption-based truth maintenance system with uncertain justifications, and its application to belief revision. Proc. of the ECAI Workshop on Truth-Maintenance Systems (J.P. Martins, M. Reinfranck, eds.), Stockholm, Aug. 6, 1990, Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences, n° 515, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 87–106.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dubois D., Lang J., Prade H. (1991b) Fuzzy sets in approximate reasoning — Part 2: Logical approaches. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 40, 203–244.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Dubois D., Martin-Clouaire R., Prade H. (1988) Practical computing in fuzzy logic. In: Fuzzy Computing (M.M. Gupta, T. Yamakawa, eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 11–34.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dubois D., Prade H. (1982) Towards the analysis and the synthesis of fuzzy mappings. In: Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory ROSE Recent Developments (R.R. Yager, ed.), Pergamon Press, New York, 316–326.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dubois D., Prade H. (1991a) Fuzzy sets in approximate reasoning — Part 1: Inference with possibility distributions. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 40, 143–202.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Dubois D., Prade H. (1991b) A note on the validation of possibilistic knowledge bases. BUSEFAL (IRIT, Univ. P. Sabatier, Toulouse,France), 48, 114–116.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dubois D., Prade H. (1992) Gradual inference rules in approximate reasoning. Information Sciences, 61(1,2), 103–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hall L.O., Friedman M., Kandel A. (1988) On the validation and testing of fuzzy expert systems. IEEE Trans, on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 18, 1023–1028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kinkiélélé D. (1992) Détection des incohérences potentielles dans les bases de connaissances floues: vers un modèle conceptuel. Presented at “1ères Rencontres Nationales des Jeunes Chercheurs en Intelligence Artificielle”, Rennes, France, Sept. 7-9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Larsen H.L., Nonfjall H. (1989) Modeling in the design of a KBS validation system. Proc. of the 3rd Inter. Fuzzy Systems Assoc. (IFSA) Congress, Seattle, Aug. 6-11, 341–344.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Larsen H.L., Nonfjall H. (1991) Modeling in the design of a KBS validation system. Int. J. of Intelligent Systems, 6, 759–775; Erratum: 7, 1992, p. 391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Loiseau S. (1992) Refinement of knowledge bases based on consistcncy. Proc. of the 10th Europ. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI’92) (B. Neumann, ed.), Vienna, Austria, Aug. 3-7, 845–849.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Meseguer P. (1991) Verification of multi-level rule-based expert systems. Proc. of the 9th National Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’91), July 14-19, 323–328.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nguyen T.A., Perkins W.A., Laffery T.J., Pecora D. (1985) Checking an expert systems knowledge base for consistency and completeness. Proc. of the 9th Inter. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’85), Los Angeles, CA, 375–378.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nguyen T.A., Perkins W.A., Laffery T.J., Pecora D. (1987) Knowledge base verification. AI Magazine, 8(2), 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Turksen I.B., Wang Q. (1992) Consistency of fuzzy expert systems with interval-valued fuzzy sets. Proc. of the Abstracts and Summaries of the 1st Inter. Conf. on Fuzzy Theory and Technology (FT&T’92) (P.P. Wang, ed.), 225–230.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yager R.R., Larsen H.L. (1991) On discovering potential inconsistencies in validating uncertain knowledge bases by reflecting on the input. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 21, 790–801.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Zadeh L.A. (1979) A theory of approximate reasoning. In: Machine Intelligence, Vol. 9 (J.E. Hayes, D. Michie, L.I. Mikulich, eds.), Elsevier, New York, 149–194.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dubois, D., Prade, H. (1994). On The Validation of Fuzzy Knowledge Bases. In: Fuzzy Reasoning in Information, Decision and Control Systems. International Series on Microprocessor-Based and Intelligent Systems Engineering, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-34652-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-34652-6_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-2643-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-585-34652-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics